Clinical Applications of UTE/ZTE
Richard Hodgson1,2,3

1Centre for Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Radiology, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Radiology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

Synopsis

UTE imaging techniques, including quantitative measurements such as T2* and off resonance saturation ratios, are increasingly being investigated in patients with musculoskeletal diseases which involve tissues that are difficult to assess with conventional MRI. Diseases that have been assessed using UTE imaging include Achilles tendinopathy, articular cartilage and meniscal injury in the knee and degenerative disc disease in the spine. UTE imaging estimates of cortical bone pore water are being validated with the aim of improving fracture risk assessment.

Specialty area

UTE & ZTE Imaging Techniques & Applications

Richard.Hodgson@manchester.ac.uk

Highlights

Quantitative UTE imaging techniques are increasingly used

UTE imaging has been investigated in the assessment of patients with Achilles tendinopathy

UTE has been used to image deep articular cartilage in the knee

Clinically feasible sequences for estimating pore water in bone are being validated

Clinical Applications of UTE/ZTE

Target audience

Radiologists and physicists interested in the potential clinical musculoskeletal applications of UTE imaging techniques.

Outcome/objectives

To review UTE imaging in patients with musculoskeletal diseases and comparisons with other methods of assessment.

Results

Tendons: UTE imaging can demonstrate structure within the tendon and the enthesis. Several studies have used UTE techniques to look at Achilles tendinopathy. Differences in UTE measurements, including T2* and off-resonance saturation ratios (OSR), have been reported between tendinopathic tendons and tendons of asymptomatic, healthy volunteers. Correlations have also been sought between UTE measurements and clinical scores. Recent work has looked at mild disease including asymptomatic tendons. Studies have also compared different UTE measurements, with one study suggesting OSR was useful for detecting mild and severe tendinopathy.

Articular cartilage: The osteochondral junction tissues have been postulated to be important in the development of osteoarthritis, however their short T2 limits visualization with conventional MRI. UTE imaging, particularly with long T2 suppression, can show linear high signal, which has been attributed to the deep cartilage. A study of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reported significant differences in the UTE-T2* of the deep cartilage compared to control subjects even when the cartilage was arthroscopically normal. T2* differences with controls had reduced 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

Cortical bone: Clinically feasible UTE imaging methods have been developed which allow the assessment of bound water and pore water within cortical bone, which are of interest as potential predictors of fracture risk. They have been compared with peripheral quantitative CT cortical volumetric bone mineral density and age.

Spine: The cartilaginous endplate may be important in degenerative disc disease. A characteristic appearance on UTE images with longer TE subtraction has been attributed to the cartilaginous endplate. Changes at the cartilaginous endplate visualised by UTE imaging have been associated with degenerative changes in disc.

Meniscus: UTE T2* of the meniscus has been been reported to be higher in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tear than asymptomatic controls even without a meniscal tear.

Conclusion

UTE imaging has been investigated for visualising and measuring tissue changes in patients with musculoskeletal diseases.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):870-83.

Siriwanarangsun P, Statum S, Biswas R, Bae WC, Chung CB. Ultrashort time to echo magnetic resonance techniques for the musculoskeletal system. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016 Dec;6(6):731-743.

Grosse U, Syha R, Hein T, Gatidis S, Grözinger G, Schabel C, Martirosian P, Schick F, Springer F. Diagnostic value of T1 and T2 * relaxation times and off-resonance saturation effects in the evaluation of Achilles tendinopathy by MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):964-73.

Chu CR, Williams AA, West RV, Qian Y, Fu FH, Do BH, Bruno S. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging UTE-T2* mapping of cartilage and meniscus healing after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1847-56.

Li C, Seifert AC, Rad HS, Bhagat YA, Rajapakse CS, Sun W, Lam SC, Wehrli FW. Cortical bone water concentration: dependence of MR imaging measures on age and pore volume fraction. Radiology. 2014 Sep;272(3):796-806.

Bae WC, Biswas R, Chen K, Chang EY, Chung CB. UTE MRI of the Osteochondral Junction. Curr Radiol Rep. 2014 Feb 1;2(2):35.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)