Santosh K Bharti1, Flonné Wildes1, Chien-Fu Hung2, TC Wu2, Zaver M Bhujwalla1,3, and Marie-France Penet1,3
1JHU ICMIC Program, Division of Cancer Imaging Research, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 3Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Synopsis
Malignant ascites occurs in
approximately 37% of terminal ovarian cancer patients. It significantly
contributes to poor quality of life and mortality. Advances in understanding
malignant ascites formation and finding new therapeutic options are urgently
needed. High-resolution proton magnetic
resonance spectroscopy provides opportunities to characterize biofluid
metabolites and can be easily
translated to the clinic. Here, we are investigating the metabolic profile of ascites
obtained in two different experimental models of ovarian cancer. To further
understand the differences observed between both models, we completed our study
by analyzing the metabolic profiles of those cells in culture and their
corresponding conditioned media.
Introduction
Ovarian cancer continues to be a leading
cause of death from gynecological malignancies in the US, and ranks fifth as a
cause of cancer-related deaths among women, with 22,280 new cases detected
every year leading to 14,240 deaths [1]. Build-up of malignant
ascites occurs in more than one third of ovarian cancer patients and
significantly contributes to poor quality of life and mortality [2, 3]. Almost all
patients at recurrence develop ascites [3]. The most common symptoms
related to malignant ascites include abdominal distension, anorexia, dyspnea,
insomnia, fatigue, respiratory distress, low capacity of walking, pain, lower
limb discomfort and edema. For most patients, the primary purpose of treatment
is to relieve the symptoms of malignant ascites and improve quality of life. Repeated
drainage can improve the condition by removing a large amount of fluid but
causes protein loss and hypovolemia, resulting in circulatory system issues. Moreover
ascites recurs usually in a short period of time. Repeated drainage may also increase the risk
of intestinal problems such as intestinal perforation and peritonitis [2]. Advances
in understanding malignant ascites formation and finding new therapeutic
options are urgently needed. High-resolution proton magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (1H MRS) has been described as extremely useful in
detecting endogenous metabolites to diagnose cancer and monitor anticancer
therapy, by providing a detailed overview of metabolic pathways in a single
measurement in cells, tumor biopsies or fluids [4]. The technique can be
easily translated to the clinic, and provides unique opportunities to
characterize metabolic composition of ascitic fluid. Malignant ascites
constitutes a dynamic reservoir of survival factors, including cytokines,
chemokines, growth factors, and extracellular matrix fragments, which individually
and in a combined fashion affect tumor cell growth and progression through
different cellular mechanisms [3]. In the present study, we
are using two ovarian cancer cell lines, the murine ID8-vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF)-Defb29 cell line and the human OVCAR3 cell line. Implanted orthotopically, these two ovarian
cancer models are characterized by different profile of ascites formation. The
mouse cell line ID8-VEGF-Defb29 induces large volumes of ascites, often more
than 10 mL, while the human OVCAR3 cell line induces ascites less frequently
and at smaller volumes, usually less than 0.2 mL. We applied high-resolution 1H
MRS to compare the metabolic composition of both ascitic fluids. To better
understand the differences observed, we characterized the metabolism of these
ovarian cancer cells in culture by analyzing cell lysates and conditioned
culture media with 1H MRS to advance our understanding of cancer
cell metabolic reprogramming in malignant ascites formation and the role of the
tumor microenvironment in ascites formation and composition. MRS derived
biomarkers detected in ascitic fluid could help ovarian cancer diagnosis, and
expand our understanding of the biochemical and metabolic changes associated
with ovarian cancer.Methods
Two ovarian cancer cell
lines were used in the present study, the human OVCAR3 and the mouse
ID8-VEGF-Defb29 [5] cell
lines. The ascitic fluids were obtained from orthotopic implanted OVCAR3 and
ID8-VEGF-Defb29 tumor bearing SCID and C57BL6 mice. High-resolution proton MRS was
performed on an Avance III 750 MHz
Bruker MR spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm broad band inverse probe. Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) pulse
sequence with water suppression was
performed to remove short T2 components arising due to the presence
of proteins as well as to obtain a better baseline in the spectra [6]. The 1H
MR spectra were referenced to the methyl resonance of acetate at 1.91 ppm. The
acetate peak was selected to calibrate the chemical shift because of its lesser
chemical shift drift due to pH variations.[7]Results and Discussion
The two tumor models used in this
study induced different ascitic profiles. While OVCAR3 tumor bearing mice
developed small viscous volume of ascites, ID8-VEGF-Defb29 induced higher
volumes. Representative spectra of ascitic fluids are shown in Figure 1. ID8-VEGF-Defb29
ascitic fluids were characterized by higher levels of glutamine, glucose, poly-unsaturated
fatty acids (PUFA) and pyruvate compared to the OVCAR3 fluids, while all the
other metabolites, including glutamate, lactate, myo-inositol, choline and
acetate, were lower in ID8-VEGF-Defb29 ascitic fluids (Figure 2). To determine
if the differences observed in the ascitic fluids were only due to a different
metabolism of the cancer cells, we investigated their metabolism in vitro. We analyzed the metabolites
present in the conditioned cell culture media, and in the cells. We observed
differences in OVCAR3 and ID8-VEGF-Defb29 cells metabolism in vitro. The ascites composition differed between both
ovarian cancer cell lines, without replicating the differences observed in vitro cells and conditioned media analysis.
Figure 3 is a Venn diagram of the different metabolites present in
the cells, media and ascites in the ID8-VEGF-Defb29 model, showing differences
in the metabolites present in those 3 compartments, and highlighting the one in
common. We identified 4 biomarkers, BHB, lipids, maleic acid and citrate, that were present in the ascitic fluid of both experimental models, and absent in the cells or media.
Ascites MRS derived biomarkers could help in ovarian cancer diagnosis, and
enhance our understanding of the biochemical and metabolic changes associated
with ovarian cancer, and with ascites formation. Further investigations are
necessary to better understand these differences. This study is a first step in
profiling ovarian cancer biofluids, and can be extended to the analysis of
serum and urine to provide information about changes in metabolite profiles,
about ascites formation and to identify potential new biomarkers.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the HERA
Foundation, the Tina's Wish Foundation, by NIH P50CA013175 and NIH P30CA06973.References
1. Siegel
RL, et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30. 2. Kipps E, et al. Nature reviews
Cancer. 2013;13(4):273-82. 3. Ahmed N, et al. Front Oncol. 2013;3:256. 4. Serkova
NJ, et al. Bioanalysis. 2012;4(3):321-41. 5. Conejo-Garcia JR, et al. Nature
medicine. 2004;10(9):950-8. 6. Van QN, et al. BBRC. 2003;301(4):952-9. 7. Cruz T,
et al. Metabolites. 2014;4(1):115-28.