We demonstrate that the maximum SAR-induced temperature in an examination can be lowered with strategic ordering of the sequences in the exam. Using numerical simulations, here we optimize the order of and time between sequences in a spine exam to minimize the maximum temperature reached in a human body model without increasing the duration of the exam. The optimized sequence has a maximum temperature 0.63 C lower than the original.
Temperature in the human body can be estimated with the Pennes’ bioheat equation2,
$$\rho{c}\frac{\partial{T}}{\partial{t}}=\nabla\cdot(k\nabla{T})-W\rho_{bl}c_{bl}(T-T_{bl})+Q+\rho{SAR}\;\;(1)$$
where T is temperature, W is rate of perfusion by blood, k is thermal conductivity, ρ is tissue mass density, c is tissue heat capacity, Q is rate of metabolism, and the subscript bl denotes values for blood. Perfusion was allowed to vary according to the model3:
$$W(r)=\begin{cases}W_{0}(r)&T(r)\leq39^{\,\circ}C\\W_{0}(r)(1+S_{B}(T(r)-39))&39^{\,\circ}C<T(r)<44^{\,\circ}C\\W_{0}(r)(1+5S_{B})&T(r)\geq44^{\,\circ}C\end{cases}\;\;(2)$$
where SB is a parameter equal to 0.8. We have considered the power levels of the MRI exam presented previously4, where the patient was placed in 6 different positions (Fig. 1). Except the first 3 sequences (Low-SAR localizers) which need to be performed at the beginning of the exam, the other sequences have been assigned to 7 groups where each group is composed of successive sequences performed in the same position of the patient so that, in the following sorting process, the time to move the table to different positions is minimized as well. The 7 blocks were ordered according to all the possible permutations (Fig. 2), and for each combination the temperature through all the exam was computed. The temperature computation was performed with a fast method based on the combination of the convolution of temperature responses with the use of a spatial filter to include the variations of the local perfusion4. The order of sequences that minimizes the temperature was further optimized by adjusting the time sequences without increasing the duration of the exam. This optimization has been performed with the Matlab function fminunc, and each iteration has been evaluated with the fast temperature computation method.
1. International Electrotechnical Commission. International standard, medical equipment – part 2: particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis, 2ndrevision. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2002. 601-2-33.
2. Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperature in the resting human forearm. Journal of applied physiology. 1948; 93-122.
3. Wang Z, Collins CM. Consideration of Physiological Response in Numerical Models of Temperature During MRI of the Human Head. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 28:1303–1308.
4. Carluccio G, Bruno M, Collins CM. Predicting long-term temperature increase for time-dependent SAR levels with a single short-term temperature response. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016; 75:2195–2203.
5. Yarmolenko PS, Jung Moon E, Landon C, Manzoor A,
Hochman DW, Viglianti B, Dewhirst MW Thresholds for thermal damage to normal
tissues: an update. International Journal of Hyperthermia. 2011; 27(4),
320-343.