Tobias Theis1, Nicolas G. R. Behl1, Erik N. K. Cressman2, Armin M. Nagel1,3, Sebastian Flassbeck1, Aaron Kujawa1, Peter Bachert1, Mark E. Ladd1, and Florian Maier1
1Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 2Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 3Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
Thermochemical ablation (TCA), a novel minimally invasive ablation
therapy, was quantitatively evaluated using 23Na MRI at 7T. In this study,
eight TCA injection experiments were performed using eight ex vivo bovine liver phantoms. Normalization on the reference tubes
and B1-correction of the 23Na images were performed to
get quantitative values. This improved the maximum relative error of the
estimated amount of substance by a factor of 3.6. The total injected amount was
accurately determined. This study shows that quantitative 23Na MRI
provides detailed information about TCA injections, which is important for
computational modelling of the method and cell damage prediction.
Target Audience
Interventionalists interested in ablation therapies, especially
thermochemical ablation (TCA) and scientists interested in quantitative 23Na
MRI.Purpose
TCA represents a novel concept of minimally invasive ablation therapy in
which two liquid reactants, for instance sodium hydroxide and acetic acid
solutions, release heat as they react prior to entering tissue as sodium
acetate (NaOAc) solution.1,2
The supplied heat causes thermal damage in the circumjacent tissue. Further
damage results from the hyperosmolar environment after injection. Recently 23Na
MRI was used to monitor TCA injections.3,4
In this study, feasibility of quantitative 23Na MRI of NaOAc
distributions was investigated in eight bovine liver phantoms. Quantitative
imaging will provide more detailed information about injected volumes advancing
the understanding of TCA towards clinical translation.Methods
All experiments were performed on a 7T whole-body MR system (Magnetom 7T,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a double-resonant 1H/23Na
birdcage
coil (Rapid Biomed, Würzburg, Germany). A density adapted 3D radial
pulse sequence5 was used
for 23Na MRI: TE = 0.3 ms, TR = 25 ms, α = 52°, Nprojections
= 20000,
Δx3 = 1 mm3, matrix = 2563, Tacq
= 8:20 min. T2w 1H images were obtained with a TSE pulse sequence. B1-maps
were calculated6,7 based
on two 23Na 3D data sets acquired with preparation pulse phases φ =
0° and φ = 180°. Injections were performed using a contrast medium injector
(Accutron MR, Medtron AG, Saarbrücken, Germany) combined with an in-house built
volume converter (1:5). In plastic trays, ex
vivo bovine liver phantoms were embedded into 0.9% NaCl solution next to four
reference tubes filled with NaOAc solutions (1 M, 2 M, 4 M,
5 M). During the experiments, sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 0.5 ml, 10 M)
and acetic acid (CH3COOH, 0.5 ml, 10 M) were injected forming
NaOAc (1 ml, 5 M) right before entering the liver through a 20 G
angio-catheter (B. Braun Melsungen, Melsungen, Germany) with an injection rate
of 0.02 ml/s within 50 s (cf. Fig.1). Eight experiments were performed with
eight ex vivo bovine liver phantoms. 23Na
MR images were acquired prior and 2:10 min after injections to quantify the distribution
of NaOAc inside each liver.
Post-processing was performed with MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA,
USA). Inhomogeneity of the radiofrequency (RF) field (B1+
and B1-) was corrected.6,7 Signal intensities were normalized on the mean
intensities of the reference tubes. B1-corrected, normalized
intensities were assumed to be quantitative, representing NaOAc concentrations
for each voxel. Difference images between 23Na MRI pre– and post–injection
were calculated to quantify changes in concentration. Image noise was removed
by applying an intensity threshold, which is defined to be three times the mean
intensity of an ROI (25x25x25 mm3) positioned in air. Sums of normalized
intensities of the difference images were calculated and the amounts of
substance of injected NaOAc solutions determined. For each image the amount of
substance of the largest, compact volume was computed using a binary mask (cf.
Fig. 2).Results
Figure 3 shows a post-injection image and a cross-section of the
corresponding ablated volume. Table 1 lists the estimated amounts of NaOAc
using normalized difference images with and without B1-correction.
After B1-correction, the maximum relative error of the determined amounts
of substance decreased from 45.2% to 12.6%. Table 1 also lists the amounts of
NaOAc of the largest volumes, which were deposited in the liver. Except for
experiment 1, where a major fraction of the injection leaked into the NaCl
solution, these include between 63.4% and 93.8% of the total injected NaOAc (5.00
mmol) minus the amount of substance remaining in the angio–catheter (0.65 mmol)
(cf. Fig. 4). Discussion
TCA involves high concentrations of NaOAc, which enable 23Na
imaging of injected volumes with high spatial resolution. Evaluation showed
that B1-corrected and normalized 23Na MR difference
images allow accurate non-invasive quantification of NaOAc injections. Small
remaining intensity gradients in the reference tubes indicate that B1
differences were not completely compensated by B1-correction in this
area. However, B1-correction reduced the maximum relative error of
the determined amounts of substance by a factor of 3.6. To further optimize
accuracy of quantification, 23Na MR images can be corrected for
differences in T1. Our study shows that B1-corrected 23Na
MRI is a useful tool to quantify TCA injections. Compared to previous
investigations1,2,3,4, this
work directly quantified distributions of substance of TCA injections in tissue
for the first time.Conclusion
Quantitative 23Na MRI provides detailed information about TCA
injections non-invasively, which is important for computational modelling of
the method and prediction of cell damage resulting from hyperosmolarity, and can
advance the understanding of TCA towards clinical translation.Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Philipp Biegger, Barbara Dillenberger, Rebekka
Haffner, Christian Kindtner and Sebastian C. Niesporek for their support.References
[1] Cressman ENK, et al. Int
J Hyperthermia. 2010; 26(4): 327–337.
[2] Cressman ENK, et al., Int J Hyperthermia 2012; 28(2):
113-121.
[3] Maier F, et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson.
Med. (2015) 23: 4147.
[4] Behl NGR, et al., Proc. Intl.
Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. (2016) 24: 199.
[5] Nagel AM, et al. Magn
Reson Med. 2009; 62(6): 1565–1573.
[6] Morrell GR, Magn Reson Med
2008, 60: 889–894.
[7] Allen SP, et al. Magn Reson Med 2010, 65(4): 1125–1130.