Vijai Krishnan1,2, Anna Schwartz1, William Stokes1, Jeff W.M. Bulte2, Jineta Banerjee2, Aline Thomas2, Pablo Celnik3, and Galit Pelled1,2
1F.M. Kirby Center, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MD, United States
Synopsis
Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to severe motor and sensory
deficits. New advances in non-invasive neuromodulation technologies such as
transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have shown promise in facilitating
recovery following brain injuries. Here we tested whether TMS therapy can be
developed as a rehabilitative approach in a rat model of SCI. High-resolution
functional MRI (fMRI) at 11.7 T was used to detect cortical activity associated
with post-injury neuroplasticity. A battery of behavioral tests was used to
monitor gross changes in motor behavior. Our results demonstrate that TMS
therapy is beneficial in improving post-SCI functional outcomes.
Introduction
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is the leading
cause of disability causing partial or complete damage to sensory and motor
pathways, thereby altering neural circuits. There are no rehabilitative strategies
that have shown a robust improvement, and there are no imaging protocols to
detect neuroplasticity associated with rehabilitation after spinal cord injury.
Evidence from basic research suggests
that within minutes after SCI, decreases in spontaneous neuronal activity are
observed in cortical areas that correspond to the injured as well as to the
non-injured limbs. Moreover, these decreases were correlated with poor
recovery. Thus, we hypothesized that an intervention to attenuate the decreases
in neuronal activity applied immediately post-SCI would accelerate
neurorehabilitation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive
method to induce neuronal excitation and plasticity beyond the stimulation
period. We have recently demonstrated that following traumatic brain injury in
rats TMS has rescued neuronal activity and led to improvement in behavioral
tests (Lu et al., Scientific Reports, 2015). Therefore, we have determined if
TMS can improve functional outcome post-SCI. Currently, the standard assessment
of SCI in rats is limited to gross behavioral tests. These tests may not be
sensitive to neuroplasticity changes associated with recovery. Here we used
high-resolution fMRI obtained at 11.7 T to monitor if TMS therapy induces
post-injury neuroplasticity. We determined the optimal TMS therapy protocol
that leads to the greatest evoked- fMRI responses to limb stimulation. Our
results demonstrate that fMRI may be a sensitive method to report on SCI
neuroplasticity. Methods
SCI was induced at
segment T7 in adult rats. This type of injury results in hind limb dysfunction.
We tested sensorimotor function in three groups: SCI rats that started receiving
TMS within 10 min after the procedure (immediate-TMS; n=7); SCI rats that
received TMS starting two weeks after the procedure (delayed-TMS; n=5), and SCI
rats that received sham TMS (no-TMS, n=7). High-frequency (20 Hz) TMS was
applied to the sensorimotor cortex via a custom built rodent coil, and was
delivered for 10 min, three times a week, for a total of six weeks. Sensory
responses to 9 Hz hind limb stimulation were delivered to dexodormitor
anesthetized rats. Blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI responses to
contralateral tactile limb stimulation were measured in an ultra-high field of
an 11.7 T/16 cm horizontal bore small-animal scanner (Bruker BioSpin,
Rheinstetten, Germany). Five 1 mm thick coronal slices covering S1 were
acquired (effective echo with a field of view (FOV), 1.92 × 1.92 cm; matrix
size, 128 × 128). A T2-weighted RARE sequence was used to acquire high-resolution
anatomical images FOV, 1.92 × 1.92 cm; matrix size, 256 × 256) corresponding to
the BOLD fMRI measurements. Results
Results show that the
immediate-TMS group demonstrated the greatest sensory responses with 56.29 ±
7.61 and 52.29 ± 6.73 activated pixels over the right (RHL) and left hind limb
(LHL), respectively; the delayed-TMS group showed moderate sensory responses
with 49.4 ± 10.45 and 38.6 ± 2.69 activated pixels in RHL and LHL; finally, the
no-TMS group exhibited low sensory responses with 26.8 ± 2.41 and 28.4 ± 4.02 activated
pixels in RHL and LHL, respectively. Motor behavior was assessed by weekly grid
walk test, which indicated that the immediate-TMS group had fewer number of
footfall errors indicating fastest recovery compared to the delayed-TMS and
no-TMS groups but they all reached the same level at the end of the treatment.Discussion
Based on previously
published evidence from our lab that verified the efficacy of TMS in improving
outcome in traumatic brain injury, we sought to extend this successful outcome
in the treatment of SCI. Our findings in this study indicate that TMS treatment
improved cortical responses during fMRI. This indicates the improvement in the integrity
of the corticospinal tract information. The results from the gridwalk indicated
improvement in the test initially amongst the immediate TMS group, but then
plateau together. Though the gridwalk is the gold standard in testing function and recovery in chronic SCI, it is not a sensitive test. Therefore there is a
need to augment the data from the fMRI with more sensitive tests such as the
motor evoked potential test. This will provide a cleaner perspective of the
correlation of TMS treatment with recovery in SCI. We anticipate that application of TMS as a
therapeutic strategy could be readily translated into the clinical setting as
an alternative or adjuvant to traditional rehabilitation strategies.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Lu, Hongyang, et al. "Transcranial magnetic stimulation facilitates neurorehabilitation after pediatric traumatic brain injury." Scientific reports 5 (2015).