Hirotsugu Funatsu1, Fuyu Hayashi1, Sosuke Yoshinaga1, Mitsuhiro Takeda1, Naoya Yuzuriha1, Shunsuke Kusanagi1, and Hiroaki Terasawa1
1Department of Structural BioImaging, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
Synopsis
A BOLD analysis can trace real-time odor
responses at high spatial resolution.
Rodents have well-developed olfactory systems, and thus BOLD studies
have mainly been performed in rodents.
However, mice have smaller brains and are more susceptible to peripheral
hemodynamic changes than rats, which make it harder to obtain sufficient BOLD
signals. This study revealed the
real-time odor response in the mouse whole brain by the BOLD experiment with
periodical odor stimulations using a high-sensitivity cryogenic probe and the
high-detectability analytical method, Independent Component Analysis (ICA). The signal changes of the activation sites
corresponded to the human canonical hemodynamic response function.
Introduction
Olfaction is one of the most important perceptions for animals to
receive information from their environments.
When odorant compounds are inhaled, the olfactory bulb (OB) shows unique
activation patterns depending on the types of odors. However, our understanding of the
odor-stimulated activation patterns over the whole brain is still limited, and
thus the means by which the brain discriminates between different odors remain
to be elucidated [1].
A BOLD analysis is the main method that
monitors real-time odor responses at high spatial resolution in studies of
rodents, which have well-developed olfactory systems. Among rodents, the number of odor fMRI
studies of mice is smaller than that of rats. Some studies have been
reported for the mouse OB [2], but the number of fMRI studies for the mouse
whole brain is much lower than that for the mouse OB [3]. One reason for this is that the mouse brain
is smaller and thus the BOLD analysis is more likely to suffer from peripheral
hemodynamic changes, which make it harder to obtain sufficient fMRI signals
[4]. Thus, a robust procedure is
required to detect odor responses in the mouse whole brain.
Independent component analysis (ICA) is a
high-detectability analytical method that can identify periodically activated
brain regions. It can detect
stimulation-evoked responses by applying periodical stimulations and tracing
the MR signal transition components that have the same frequency as the
stimulation frequency [5]. ICA was
successfully employed in some fMRI studies of rats [6, 7]. Here, we applied ICA to the BOLD experiment in
which odor stimulation was periodically applied to mice during GRE-EPI scans at
high-temporal resolution. In addition, a
cryogenic probe was used to improve the detectability of the BOLD response.
The aim of this study is to establish a method
that can detect odor responses in the mouse whole brain and to reveal the
mechanism of odor discrimination, by using the above-mentioned elemental
techniques.Methods
MRI experiments were performed with a 7.0
Tesla Bruker BioSpec 70/20 scanner and a mouse brain 2-channel phased array
surface cryogenic coil (Bruker BioSpin).
Mice (male C57BL/6, 8–10 weeks old) were anesthetized with urethane
(i.p. 1.5 g/kg initial; 0.1 g/kg/hr supplemental) and GRE-EPI images were
acquired: TR/TE=4000/21.3 ms; FOV=1.28×1.28 cm2; matrix=64×64;
resolution=200×200 µm2; slice thickness=400 µm; slices=30; NEX=1;
flip angle=90°. In the middle of the
scans, isoamyl acetate (IAA) vapor was mixed with the air flow and delivered to
the mouse nose. The odor stimulation
consisted of 24 tasks of 5 sec ON and 55 sec OFF. The images were analyzed by
ICA with the FSL software. The MR signal
transition components with the same frequency as the odor stimulations were
selected to identify the activated regions in the mouse brains.Result
As a result of the ICA
of the MR data, the components that had the 16.6 mHz signal frequency were
detected in the piriform cortex (Fig.1A), the dorsal OB (Fig.1B) and a wide range region
that includes the posterior lateral hypothalamus (PLH), the medial part of the
extended amygdala (EAM) and the central part of the extended amygdala
(EAC). In each region, an increase of
the signal intensity was observed about 8 sec after the stimulation on the
signal time course, which was generated by summing the intensity profiles of
the 24 tasks (Fig.2). The observed delay
was consistent with the human canonical hemodynamic response function and the
results of a previous study, in which the rat OB was repeatedly stimulated by
IAA [8].Discussion
The piriform cortex, which belongs
to an olfactory pathway and thus was expected to be activated by odor
stimulation, was actually detected in this study (Fig.1A). Consistent with our results in mice, the
activation in the dorsal OB was reported in IAA-stimulated rats [2, 8],
suggesting the similar activation pattern by IAA (Fig.1B). The PLH was also activated (Fig.1C), which
may indicate the feeding center activation [9] by the banana-like odor of IAA. When the 24 tasks were divided into the first
half and the second half, the BOLD response summed over the second half was
smaller than that summed over the first half, possibly due to the effect of
desensitization [2].Conclusion
This study revealed the
real-time activation of the mouse whole brain by odor stimulation, based on the
signal intensity analysis with ICA. We
plan to examine other anesthetic agents, to explore brain
activation in more detail. We also plan to analyze and compare the activation
of brain regions evoked by other odorants, to reveal the mechanism of odor
discrimination.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by
Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (JP15H04489) (to H.T.) and Scientific
Research (C) (JP26450129) (to S.Y.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of
Science.References
[1] Touhara, K. and Vosshall, L.B., Annu. Rev. Physiol. 71, 307–332 (2009), [2] Xu, F. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11029–11034 (2003), [3] Pain, F. et al., Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2689–2709 (2011), [4] Ielacqua, G.D. et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23, 2037 (2015), [5] Sinieral, J.D. et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24, 1716 (1999), [6] Berge, N. et al., PLOS ONE. 10, 7 (2015), [7] Yuzuriha, N. et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24, 1722 (2016), [8] Martin, C. et al., NeuroImage 36, 1288–1293 (2007), [9] Li, J. et al., Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 332–350 (2014)