Haojie Li1, Yonghong Hao1, Daoyu Hu1, and Zhen Li1
1Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wu Han, People's Republic of China
Synopsis
Because of different subtypes of RCC have different prognoses and
respond differently to targeted therapies, accurate identification of the
specific diagnosis prior to treatment is important. In this study, our results demonstrate that the combination of
r-FOV DWI and the whole-lesion histogram analysis method may help in the
interpretation of DWI of small renal masses and determine the optimal ADC
parameter for quantitative assessment. The
75th percentile ADC value was more reliable than other histogram parameter
values in distinguishing clear cell from non-clear cell RCCs with high
sensitivity and specificity, potentially improving the accuracy of pretreatment
diagnosis and selection of clinical therapy.
Purposeļ¼
To determine the utility of ADC histogram
analysis derived from high-resolution r-FOV DWI for differentiation of clear cell
renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC).Introduction:
Because of different subtypes of RCC have
different prognoses and respond differently to targeted therapies, accurate identification
of the specific diagnosis prior to treatment is important. Previously studies
have demonstrated the whole-lesion histogram analysis could enable elimination
of sample bias and enhanced assessment of the intromission heterogeneity.1 The
reduced field-of-view (r-FOV) DWI, a novel developed DWI sequences, which has
been recognized valuable in providing high resolution and high-quality DWI in small
structures by reducing the number of required k-space lines.2 Therefore, the purpose of this
study was to explore the diagnostic performance of whole-lesion ADC histogram
parameters derived from high-resolution r-FOV DWI in the differentiation of
subtypes of RCC (clear cell versus non-clear cell RCC).Materials and Methods:
This Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective study included 64 patients with either pathologic analysis-confirmed
ccRCC (n=46) or non-ccRCC (n=18). All patients underwent preoperative r-FOV DWI
(b=600s/mm2) at 3T MRI. The whole-lesion ADC assessments were
performed for each patient. All Histogram-derived ADC parameters between ccRCC
and non-ccRCC were compared by using the Student’s
t test or Mann–Whitney U test. Receiver
operating characteristic analysis was
used for statistical evaluations.Results:
ADC histograms
of the non-ccRCC group (Fig. 1) were mostly skewed positively,
while the curves of ccRCC (Fig. 2) were largely skewed negatively.
Mean ADC, median ADC, 5th percentile ADC, 25th percentile ADC, 75th percentile
ADC, 95th percentile ADC were significantly lower in non-ccRCC (all P < 0.001), while skewness was
significantly higher in non-ccRCC (P<0.001) (Fig. 3). 75th percentile ADC achieved the highest
AUC (0.987) in differentiating ccRCC and non-ccRCC, with a cutoff value of 1.81× 10-3
mm2/s, and a sensitivity of 100.0%
and a specificity of 94.7% (Fig. 4).Discussion and conclusion:
In this
study, the preliminary date from our study demonstrate that the combination of
r-FOV DWI and the whole-lesion histogram analysis method may help in the
interpretation of DWI of small renal masses and determine the optimal ADC
parameter for quantitative assessment. The 75th percentile ADC value was
more reliable than other histogram metrics in distinguishing clear
cell from non-clear cell RCCs with high sensitivity and specificity,
potentially improving the accuracy of pretreatment diagnosis and selection of
clinical therapy.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Rosenkrantz AB. Histogram-based apparent diffusion coefficient analysis:an emerging tool for cervical cancer characterization? AJR Am JRoentgenol 2013;200:311–313.
2. Riffel P, Michaely HJ, Morelli JN, et al. Zoomed EPI-DWI of the head and neck with two-dimensional, spatially-selective radiofrequencyexcitation pulses. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2507–2512.