Parul Chachra1, Suresh Emmanuel Joel1, Rakesh Mullick1, and Radhika Madhavan1
1GE Global Research, Bangalore, India
Synopsis
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)
has been suggested to provide key understanding of large-scale network
organization in human brain. Harnessing rs-fMRI, we have examined the relationship
of seed-based connectivity (SBC) with amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations
(ALFF) and fractional ALFF (fALFF). We recorded rs-fMRI from healthy volunteers
and measured regional ALFF, fALFF and SBC. We demonstrate that ALFF and fALFF were weakly
correlated to SBC and the correlation was specifically stronger for selected
networks. Our results suggest that ALFF/fALFF and SBC may be driven by the same
underlying factors and thus co-vary in a similar manner.
Introduction
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance
imaging (rs-fMRI) studies have provided an improved understanding of the human
brain functional integration and large-scale network organization1,2.
Seed-based connectivity (SBC) analysis has been widely used to define various
brain networks and the functional connectivity within2,3, and
amplitude of low-frequency (0.01–0.1 Hz) fluctuation (ALFF) has been suggested
to reflect the intensity of regional spontaneous brain activity1,4.
However, ALFF is more sensitive to the physiological and system related noise
and thus fractional ALFF (fALFF) (ratio of power spectrum of low- frequency to
that of the entire frequency range) approach has been suggested in the field4.
Previously, we have
shown that in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients, both fALFF and SBC
were correlated to symptom severity within the same regions-of-interest (ROI)5,6.
Hence, in this study we have examined the correlation between SBC and
ALFF/fALFF in healthy subjects to understand the nature of their relationship. We correlated the resting-state SBC with regional ALFF and fALFF
independently in a voxel-wise manner. The correlations were examined across
different networks to determine whether these associations spanned across the
entire brain or were specific to selective networks.
Methods
After obtaining informed consent, rs-fMRI was recorded from 26 healthy
controls (2 sessions, 1 week apart). After eliminating missing and noisy data,
we analyzed 41 time points in total. Using GE 3T MRI scanner, multi-band
(acceleration factor 3) 2D-EPI, TR/TE = 900/30 ms was acquired for 6 minutes
(395 volumes), with 1.875 mm2 in-plane resolution and 3 mm slice
thickness to cover the whole brain. T1-weighted scan (1 mm resolution) was
acquired at each time point and used for spatial normalization process. rs-fMRI
data was motion corrected, rigid registered to T1-weighted image, non-rigid
registered to MNI atlas, nuisance removed using aCompCor7, spatial
smoothed using Gaussian filter (4mm FWHM) using custom-built software. rs-fMRI data
was temporally band-pass filtered (0.01-0.1 Hz) and 12 SBC maps were extracted
for all subjects. ALFF maps were calculated as power of 0.01-0.1 Hz band. fALFF
was calculated by dividing the ALFF maps by the total power of the entire
frequency range (0-0.55 Hz). ALFF and fALFF were calculated for 14 functional
networks derived from 90 functional ROIs8. Correlation between SBC
and ALFF/fALFF at each ROI across subjects was computed.
Results
We analyzed voxel-wise correlation between SBC and ALFF/fALFF in 12 resting-state
functional connectivity networks. SBC
for the default-mode network (DMN) is shown in Figure 1A. We observed correlation
between SBC and ALFF/fALFF values in DMN (Figure 1B, C). Correlation
maps, thresholded using p<0.001 (Figure 1D, E) also showed overlap of
ALFF/fALFF values with SBC. We analyzed SBC for eleven other networks (Figure 2A) and investigated
voxel-wise correlations between SBC and ALFF/fALFF (Figure 2B, C). ALFF
and fALFF values showed correlation with SBC in certain networks in specific
regions. Hot and cold colors encode positive and negative effects,
respectively.
Next, we computed mean correlation matrix of SBC across 90 ROIs
and their relationship to regional ALFF and fALFF. We observed relatively
higher connectivity within each network as compared to across networks (Figure 3A). The ROIs were arranged by their 14 network
affiliations (Figure 3B).
Correlation
between SBC and ALFF/fALFF at each ROI across subjects was computed (Figure 3C, D). The thresholded
correlations between ALFF/fALFF and SBC have been illustrated (p <0.001) (Figure
3E, F). Hot and cold colors encode positive and negative correlations,
respectively. While there was correlation between SBC and ALFF/fALFF, most of
this correlation was weak (not significant, Figure 3E, F). The
correlation between fALFF and SBC was stronger in most functional ROIs compared
to ALFF (Figure 3C, D).
Discussion
Our results demonstrate that while network connectivity (measured using
SBC) was correlated to low amplitude fluctuations (ALFF/fALFF) in rs-fMRI, this
correlation was weak (not significant when considering multiple comparisons)
and was specifically stronger for selected networks. Correlation of SBC was
stronger with fALFF compared to ALFF. We also observed that negative
correlations were far more evident between fALFF and SBC than ALFF and SBC. Non-neuronal
physiological noise affects both SBC and fALFF/ALFF computations. Hence, the
correlation between ALFF and SBC may result from both neural and noise
contributions. Our results show that ALFF/fALFF and SBC co-vary and are possibly
driven by the same underlying factors. Hence, for biomarker discovery, using
fALFF or SBC might be equally relevant.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Di, Xin, et al. "The influence of the amplitude of
low-frequency fluctuations on resting-state functional connectivity."
Frontiers in human neuroscience 7 (2013): 118.
[2] Biswal, Bharat, et al. "Functional connectivity in the motor
cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar mri." Magnetic resonance
in medicine 34.4 (1995): 537-541.
[3] Fox, Michael D., et al. "The human brain is intrinsically
organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks." Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102.27
(2005): 9673-9678.
[4] Zou, Qi-Hong, et al. "An improved approach to detection of
amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI:
fractional ALFF." Journal of neuroscience methods 172.1 (2008): 137-141.
[5] Madhavan, et al. “Reduced low frequency band power in resting state
activity predicts symptom severity in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).” In
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Singapore, USA, 2016. 1193
[6] Joel, et al. “mTBI symptom severity is associated with functional
connectivity of specific networks.” In Proceedings of the
24th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Singapore, USA, 2016. 1196.
[7] Behzadi, Y., Restom, K., Liau, J. & Liu, T. T. A component
based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI.
NeuroImage 37, 90-101, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 (2007).
[8] Shirer, W. R., et al. "Decoding subject-driven cognitive
states with whole-brain connectivity patterns." Cerebral cortex 22.1
(2012): 158-165.