Shruti Agarwal1, Hanzhang Lu1, and Jay J. Pillai1
1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
In brain tumor patients,
coupling between neuronal activity and BOLD response is often disrupted (known
as neurovascular uncoupling (NVU)), resulting in dangerous underestimation of
true extent of eloquent cortex in pre-surgical planning. With increasing
popularity of resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) for presurgical mapping, it becomes
critical to investigate effects of NVU in rsfMRI. A recent study demonstrated
that tumor-related NVU can impact resting state functional connectivity within
the sensorimotor network as assessed using a seed-based correlation analysis
(SCA).2 We now explore whether NVU may also affect the rsfMRI
frequency domain metrics ALFF (amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation) &
fALFF (fractional ALFF).
Purpose
Neurovascular uncoupling (NVU) is an under-recognized limitation of
clinical BOLD fMRI. In patients with brain tumors or other focal brain structural
lesions, the coupling between neuronal activity and the subsequent BOLD
response is often disrupted, resulting in dangerous underestimation of true
extent of eloquent cortex in pre-surgical planning.1 With recent growing interest in
using resting state BOLD fMRI (rsfMRI) for presurgical mapping, the
investigation of the effects of NVU on rsfMRI becomes more critical. A recent
study,2
demonstrated that brain tumor-related
NVU can impact resting state functional connectivity within the sensorimotor
network as assessed using a seed-based correlation analysis (SCA) similar to previously
published findings of task-based fMRI (tbfMRI)3. We wished to explore whether NVU
may also affect the resting state fMRI frequency domain metrics ALFF (the
amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation4) & fALFF (fractional ALFF5).Methods
Twelve de novo brain tumor
patients who underwent clinical fMRI exams including tbfMRI and rsfMRI on 3T
MRI systems were included in this IRB-approved study. Each patient displayed decreased/absent
tbfMRI activation in the primary ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex in the
absence of corresponding motor deficit or suboptimal task performance,
consistent with NVU.3 Imaging was performed on a 3.0 T Siemens Trio
MRI with a 12-channel head matrix coil using a 3D T1 MPRAGE (TR=2300 ms, TI=
900 ms, TE= 3.5 ms, 9° FA, 24-cm FOV, 256x 256x176 matrix, slice thickness 1
mm) for structural imaging and multiple 2D GE-EPI T2* weighted BOLD sequences
for both task & resting functional imaging (TR=2000 ms, TE=30 ms, 90° FA,
24-cm FOV, 64x64x33 matrix, 4 mm slice thickness with 1 mm gap between slices,
interleaved acquisition). 180 volumes were acquired in 6 minute long rsfMRI
scan. A vertical tongue movement task
and a bilateral simultaneous sequential finger tapping task (each 3 minutes duration
with alternating 30 second blocks of movement and rest) were used for tbfMRI.
Instructions for all tasks were visually cued. SPM12 was used for preprocessing
of tbfMRI & rsfMRI data (slice timing correction, realignment, normalization
to MNI space at 2mm voxel resolution, and spatially smoothing using a 6 mm FWHM
Gaussian kernel). Z-score maps for the motor tasks were obtained from the
general linear model (GLM) analysis using standard SPM canonical HRF
(reflecting motor activation vs. rest). Pre-processed rsfMRI data were analyzed
using the REST(version 1.8)6 toolkit with de-trending for removal of systematic
linear trend. fALFF maps were calculated from de-trended rsfMRI data. Low
frequency (0.01-0.08 Hz) bandpass filtering was performed before calculation of
a Pearson linear correlation seed based functional connectivity (SCA) map2
& ALFF map from rsfMRI data. For ROI analysis, pre- and post- central gyri were
automatically parcellated using an Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) template7,8 for each
patient. CL (contralesional) and IL (ipsilesional) ROIs circumscribing the
combination of pre- and post- central gyri (CG) were obtained for each slice. Consecutive
axial sections were evaluated along the z-axis including total extent of pre-
& post- CG. Identical ROIs were used for analysis of four maps (tbfMRI, SCA,
ALFF, and fALFF).Results
Voxel values in the contralesional (CL) & ipsilesional
(IL) ROIs of each map were divided by the corresponding global mean of ALFF &
fALFF in the cortical brain tissue. Group analysis revealed significantly decreased
IL ALFF (p=0.02) and fALFF (p=0.03) metrics (based on mean of nonzero value voxels)
compared to CL ROIs, consistent with similar findings of statistically
significantly decreased ipsilesional BOLD signal for tbfMRI (p=0.0005) & SCA
maps (p=0.0004). Results for a single subject are shown in Figure 1.Discussion
In this preliminary study we have shown that regional alterations in the
frequency domain rsfMRI metrics ALFF & fALFF correspond to similar
ipsilesional abnormal activation reductions on tbfMRI & decreased resting
state functional connectivity using SCA
in the setting of tumor-induced NVU. The abnormally reduced ipsilesional
task-based activation in the absence of corresponding neurological deficits or
impaired task performance is direct evidence of NVU, whereas the findings on
the other maps are resting state correlates of such NVU.Conclusion
The frequency domain metrics ALFF & fALFF may be markers of
lesion-induced NVU in rsfMRI similar to previously reported alterations in
tbfMRI activation & SCA-derived functional connectivity rsfMRI maps. The
potential advantages of the frequency domain metrics include possible absence
of network specificity in the assessment of NVU, but this remains to be
determined in the future.Acknowledgements
This work is partially supported by NIH grant R42 CA173976-02 (NCI).References
1. Attwell D,
et al. Nature 2010;468:232-243
2. Agarwal S,
et al. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016 Mar; 43(3):620-6
3. Zacà D, et
al. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40(2):383-90
4. Zang YF,
et al. Brain Dev 2007;29(2):83-91
5. Zou QH, et
al., J Neurosci Methods 2008;172(1):137-41
6. Song X-W,
et al. PLoS ONE 2011;6(9):e25031
7.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, et al. Neuroimage 2002;15:273–89
8. Smith SM.
Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55