Unlike blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD)-fMRI, accurate physiologic adjustment for subjects during rs-fMRI data acquisition does not seem to be critical for the quality of the final data. In this study, we performed rs-fMRI measurements during normal and abnormal physiological conditions and analyzed betweenness centrality (BC), degree centrality (DC) and eigenvector centrality (EC). In this study, we demonstrate that physiologic conditions seem to have a direct effect on the rs-fMRI result. Thus, the results of our current study suggest that normal physiologic condition should be maintained for rs-fMRI data acquisition.
Animal Preparations: A total of 11 Sprague-Dawley rats (8-9 wks, male, 300 ± 20 g) were used in this study. Rats were anesthetized using isoflurane and intubated with a 16 gage vascular catheter to control physiology state. For arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA), blood sampling performed on left femoral artery after every rs-fMRI acquisition. Rs-fMRI acquisition was performed in 3 sessions (Fig. 1): 1) immediately after setting the animal in the magnet, without any physiologic adjustment, uncontrolled condition; 2) after electric stimulated BOLD-fMRI acquisition was performed, normal physiologic condition (PCO2=35~45, PO2=80~100 and PH=7.35~7.45); 3) during abnormal physiologic condition, hypoventilated condition (i.e., hypercapnia, pCO2>45, pO2<80, and pH<7.35)). The 1st rs-fMRI acquisition was finished in about 30 minutes. For the 2nd rs-fMRI acquisition, in order to get normal and stable physiologic condition, we tried to acquire electric stimulated BOLD-fMRI data which needed about 3~6 hours to reach the normal and stable physiologic condition in the magnet. We confirmed the signal of electric forepaw stimulated BOLD-fMRI (pulse width= 1.0 ms, current= 1.4 mA) at normal physiologic condition. For the 3rd rs-fMRI acquisition, we reduced ventilation about 30% than normal level and increased anesthesia 1.2 to 2.0 %.
MRI data acquisitions: All MRI data were obtained using Bruker 7T animal scanner equipped with a quadrature birdcage coil and array brain coil. Rs- fMRI data were collected using a single-shot gradient echo EPI sequence (TE= 20 ms, TR= 1000 ms, flip angle= 45°, number of average= 1, field of view= 30 (readout) x 15 (phase encoding) mm2, matrix size= 64 x 64, in-plane resolution= 469 x 233 μm2, slice thickness= 1.0 mm, number of slices= 12 coronal slices, number of repetition= 380, scan time= 6 min 20 sec).
Data Analysis: All preprocessing were performed using the FMRIB Software Library (FSL) packages and Analysis of Functional NeuroImages (AFNI). The raw data were pre-treated with skull stripping, slice timing correction, motion alignment, linear registration, nuisance regression, band-pass filtering and spatial smoothing. We compared betweenness centrality (BC), degree centrality (DC) and eigenvector centrality (EC) by analyze voxel-wise functional networks correlation for each subject. We used a paired t-test to calculate statistical group differences in rs-fMRI sessions using SPSS 19.0 software.
1. Di X, Gohel S, Kim EH, et al. Task vs. rest-different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 17;7:493
2. Bullmore E, Sporns O., et al. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):86-98