Karthik Sreenivasan1, Virendra Mishra1, Zhengshi Yang1, Xiaowei Zhuang1, Sarah Banks1, Dietmar Cordes1,2, and Ryan R Walsh1
1Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
Synopsis
The objective of this study was to use resting-state functional connectivity
and graph theory to determine how the topology of the network is altered in PD with
respect to severity of motor dysfunction. The current study revealed altered functional connectivity and topological
properties of networks in PD with respect to severity of motor dysfunction. Our
results point
to a shift towards a less efficient network topology with altered integration
and segregation in more motorically affected patients.
Introduction
Parkinson's disease
(PD) is a progressive movement disorder of the central nervous system, which is
characterized by altered motor (akinesia, tremors, etc), and non-motor aspects
(olfactory, sleep, etc) of functioning. Several studies have reported altered
topology of brain function in patients with PD1,2. How the severity (in
terms of motor dysfunction) of the disease modulates the functional topological
organization of the brain, however, remains poorly understood. The objective of
this study was to use resting-state functional connectivity and graph theory to
determine how the topology of the network is altered in PD with respect to severity
of motor dysfunction.Methods
The data used in the
preparation of this article were obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers
Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/data). For up-to-date information
on the study, visit www.ppmi-info.org.
Functional-MRI data for 18 healthy controls and two groups of 18 PD-subjects
(PD1 and PD2) were obtained from the PPMI database (see Table 1 for
demographics). The two PD groups differed in disease severity (in terms of
motor dysfunction; PD1 high MDS UPDRS III score ; PD2 low MDS UPDRS III score) as
determined by MDS-UPDRS III scores. Imaging parameters are described in detail
at http://www.ppmi-info.org/.
After standard preprocessing, mean time series were obtained from 90 ROIs based
on the AAL atlas (excluding cerebellum and vermis). The connectivity between
two ROIs was estimated using Pearson’s correlation between their averaged time-series,
and subsequently a connectivity matrix (90 x 90) was obtained for each subject.
Network-based statistic (NBS) was used to evaluate functional connectivity differences
between the groups (Control vs PD1 & Control vs PD2). A linear regression
between connectivity values and MDS UPDRS II scores was performed for paths
significantly different between the groups, after controlling for age and
gender. In addition, these connectivity matrices were used to study the
topological properties of the brain functional networks. Graph theory measures
were obtained using GRETNA toolbox3. Small worldness (γ), pathlength (Lp), clustering
coefficient (Cp), Global (GE) and local efficiency (LE), were computed for each
subject at various sparsity thresholds (S 0.05-0.4, ∆S=0.01). Two-sample t-tests
were used to see if any of the above metrics were significantly different
between the groups at all sparsity thresholds.Results
The NBS identified a
set of 40 enhanced connections in control group comparing with PD1 (Fig. 1), primarily
comprising the pallidum, supplementary motor area, precuneus, inferior temporal
gyrus and few other regions. Results were visualized with the BrainNet Viewer (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/)4. Among these different connections, eight paths showed a significant
(p<0.05) association with MDS UPDRS III scores (Fig. 2). No other group
comparisons (PD1 > Control, Control > PD2 and Control < PD2) showed
significant changes in connectivity. Fig. 3 shows the graph theory results. The
functional connectivity networks corresponding to all three groups represented
a clear small-world organization. But both γ and Cp did not show any
significant differences for a defined range of sparsity (S) thresholds and also
the integrated AUC values. However, the path lengths were significantly lower
in controls and PD2 group when compared to the PD1 group at majority of the
sparsity thresholds (0.15-0.4). The controls and PD2 had a significantly higher
GE values at most sparsity thresholds (0.15 – 0.4) and the controls had a
significantly higher local efficiency than PD1 group. Discussion
The current study
revealed altered functional connectivity and topological properties of networks
in PD with respect to severity of motor dysfunction. Our results show decreased
functional connectivity in the PD1 group when compared to controls between
regions known to be implicated in PD. No significant differences were found in
functional connectivity between PD2 group and the controls, indicating that the
severity of disease (motor dysfunction) is inversely related to functional
connectivity. Furthermore, PD1 (high UPDRS III) group showed a) reduced GE and
LE and increased Lp when compared to controls and b) lower GE and Lp compared to
PD2 (low UPDRS III) group. These observations point to a shift towards a less
efficient network topology with altered integration and segregation in more motorically
affected patients.Conclusion
The functional connectivity and graph
theoretical study in patients with PD revealed disrupted functional
connectivity and network topology modulated by disease motoric severity. These
findings are mainly important, given the fact that, looking at changes in
functional networks related to different disease related factors may help us
better understand the heterogeneity of PD. Acknowledgements
This study was partially supported by the NIH
COBRE grant 1P20GM109025-01A1 and the Elaine P Wynn and Family Foundation. The
Michael J. Fox Foundation supports the PPMI study for Parkinson’s Research. Other
funding partners include a consortium of industry players, non-profit organizations
and private individualsReferences
[1] Baggio, H.-C., Sala-Llonch, R., Segura, B.,
Marti, M.-J., Valldeoriola, F., Compta, Y., Tolosa, E. and Junqué, C. (2014),
Functional brain networks and cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease. Hum.
Brain Mapp., 35: 4620–4634. doi:10.1002/hbm.22499
[2] Luo CY, Guo XY, Song W, Chen Q, Cao B, Yang J,
Gong QY, Shang HF. (2015), Functional connectome assessed using graph theory in
drug-naive Parkinson's disease. J. Neurol. 262(6):1557-67. doi:
10.1007/s00415-015-7750-3.
[3] Wang J, Wang X, Xia M, Liao X, Evans A and He Y
(2015), GRETNA: a graph theoretical network analysis toolbox for imaging
connectomics. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 30 June 2015 |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00386
[4] Xia M, Wang J, He
Y (2013) BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain
Connectomics. PLoS ONE 8(7): e68910. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910