We employed the test-retest HCP datasets scanned at both 3T and 7T scanners from a same group of 62 healthy adults to compare differences in common functional metrics of the human connectome between 3T and 7T rfMRI settings in terms of their regional variations, individual variability and test-retest reliability. Our findings revealed metric-specific differences in both spatial patterns and reliability between 3T and 7T scanners whereas 7T improves reliability of global metrics but reduces reliability of local metrics of the functional connectomes.
The Human Connectome Project (HCP) shared multi-dimensional data of both brain and behavior collected from 1,200 healthy adults at a single site to the community. During development of the HCP, a set of standardized frameworks has been established for data collection, storage, analyses and sharing1. While HCP released resting-state fMRI (rfMRI) data for evaluation of a very short-term (two days) test-retest reliability, the Consortium for Reliability and Reproducibility (CoRR) offers data of various test-retest durations (from hours to years) across multiple imaging sites2. Both CoRR and HCP are increasingly becoming a testbed for standardized human brain connectomics. Previous findings revealed three major observations of test-retest reliability3,4: 1) metrics with closer structural or morphological basis are more reliable that those without; 2) local metrics are more reliable than global ones; and 3) advances of rfMRI (spatial-temporal resolution and scan duration) improve test-retest reliability. While all the previous reliability assessments in functional connectomics of the human brain were derived from 3T rfMRI data, no investigations exist to test reliability of functional connectomes derived from 7T rfMRI data although strength increases of the magnetic fields improved the signal-to-noise ratio5.
1. Glasser MF, et al. 2016. The Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach. Nat Neurosci. 9(9):1175-87.
2. Zuo XN, et al., 2014. An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics. Sci Data. 1:140049.
3. Zuo XN, Xing XX. 2014. Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 45:100-18.
4. Jiang L, Zuo XN. 2016. Regional Homogeneity: A Multimodal, Multiscale Neuroimaging Marker of the Human Connectome. Neuroscientist. 22(5):486-505.
5. De Martino F, et al. 2011. Whole brain high-resolution functional imaging at ultra high magnetic fields: an application to the analysis of resting state networks. Neuroimage. 57(3):1031-44.
6. Zuo XN, et al., 2010. The oscillating brain: complex and reliable. Neuroimage. 49(2):1432-45.
7. Zuo XN, et al., 2013. Toward reliable characterization of functional homogeneity in the human brain: preprocessing, scan duration, imaging resolution and computational space. Neuroimage. 65:374-86.
8. Zuo XN, et al. 2010. Growing together and growing apart: regional and sex differences in the lifespan developmental trajectories of functional homotopy. J Neurosci. 30(45):15034-43.
9. Biswal B, et al. 1995. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 34(4):537-41.
10. Xu T, et al. 2015. A Connectome Computation System for discovery science of brain. Sci Bull. 60(1):86-95.