Aiming Lu1, Krzysztof R Gorny2, Mai Lan Ho2, John III Huston2, Robert J Witte2, John I Lane2, Dan Rettmann3, Michael Carl3, and Gaspar Delso3
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 2Mayo Clinical, Rochester, MN, United States, 3GE Healthcare
Synopsis
Using MRI for depicting solid cortical bone structures is of increasing clinical interest. Due to its low water content and short transverse relaxation time, cortical bone appears as signal void in conventional gradient echo or spin echo pulse sequences. This allows “black bone” techniques to be used when air does not confuse the visualization of cortical bone. In cases differentiation between bone tissues and ai are desired “bright bone” techniques utilizing Ultrashort echo time (UTE) or Zero TE (ZTE) MRI-have been proposed. Long T2-suppression methods (e.g., echo subtraction, long T2 saturation) are often applied to generate positive cortical bone contrast. However, clinical applications of these methods are still limited due to significant increase in acquisition time and reduced SNR efficiency. Recently a prototype proton density (PD)-weighted, zero TE (ZT) sequence has been demonstrated clinically. This work aims to improve the bright bone MRI using the ZTE sequence by optimizing the bone signal during data acquisition, minimizing partial volume effect with ultra high resolution data acquisition and optimizing the image processing for better bone/air differentiation.
Introduction
Using MRI for depicting
solid cortical bone structures is of increasing clinical interest. Due to its low water content (~20%)
and short transverse relaxation time (T2* ~ 0.4ms),
cortical bone appears as signal void in conventional gradient echo or spin echo
pulse sequences. This allows “black bone” techniques to be used
when air does not confuse the visualization of cortical bone (1). In cases differentiation between bone tissues and ai are desired
“bright bone” techniques utilizing Ultrashort
echo time (UTE) or Zero TE (ZTE) MRI-have been proposed (2, 3). Long
T2-suppression methods (e.g., echo subtraction, long T2 saturation) are often applied to generate positive
cortical bone contrast. However, clinical
applications of these methods are still limited due to significant increase in acquisition
time and reduced SNR efficiency. Recently a prototype proton density
(PD)-weighted, zero TE (ZT) sequence has been demonstrated clinically (4). This
work aims to improve the bright bone MRI using the ZTE sequence by optimizing
the bone signal during data acquisition, minimizing partial volume effect with
ultra high resolution data acquisition and optimizing the image processing for
better bone/air differentiation.Methods
Imaging experiments were performed using the ZTE sequence on
a Discovery MR750w 3.0T scanner (GE, Waukesha,
WI). IRB
approval was obtained for all healthy human studies. Common
acquisition parameters included FOV/slice thickness/BW= 24cm/1mm/83.3KHz. The
highest flip angle of 2° was
used (limited by the RF pulse duration required to achieve wide excitation
bandwidth to minimize image blurring due to excitation profile). To minimize
the partial volume effect from surrounding tissues, readout matrix sizes
of 384×384×240
and 512×512×240 were used. The acquisition times were ~12 and 9 minutes
for the two matrix sizes respectively.
Image reconstruction was performed using
the offline reconstruction using vendor-supplied software. Both the original
magnitude images and the processed bone images were generated. The original magnitude images were subsequently processed
offline using Matlab code to improve the bone/air differentiation. First, signal intensity correction was performed on
a slice-by-slice basis by normalizing it to the mean soft tissue signal in that
slice. Second, a multi-resolution ROI based intensity correction was applied to
further correct for residual signal intensity variations in a way similar to
(3). A mask was then generated based on the histogram and applied to the signal
intensity inverted images to obtain the final images. Results and Discussion
Representative signal intensity histograms with and without
intensity correction are shown in Fig. 1.
The highest peak corresponds to the noise while the broader peak with high
signal intensity (higher bin index) represents the soft tissue. Between the two
peaks is the cortical bone signal. The
improvement in the signal distribution with the intensity correction is clearly
demonstrated before (Fig1a) and after slice based intensity correction (Fig. 1b) and ROI based intensity
correction (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 2 shows a representative section
of the head of a volunteer. The uncorrected magnitude images (Fig. 2a), primarily dominated by PD
contrast, reveal a slight bottom-to-top gradient in signal intensity. The
intensity corrected image (Fig. 2b)
shows more homogeneous intensities across the FOV. The difference in signal
intensity among air, tissue and cortical bone is readily visible. The bone
image (Fig. 2C) generated
automatically by the scanner depicted the bone nicely but it didn’t
differentiate the cortical bone from the air very well, as can be seen in the
air cavity in the nose. Air is suppressed much better in the image obtained
with the method proposed in this work (Fig.
2d).
Fig 2. Representative image from the same
section. (a) Magnitude image. (b) Intensity corrected magnitude image (c)
Bone image generated automatically using the program provided by the
manufacturer. (d) Bone image created using
the proposed method.
Fig. 2 Representative magnitude (a), phase
(b) and merged composite images. (c).
Due to
the relatively long acquisition time, a certain degree of motion artifact is present
in some of the images despite the inherit resilience of ZTE sequence to motion.
These artifacts could be potentially minimized by sampling the k-space in an
interleaved fashion and then using low resolution images generated from each
interleave for rigid body motion correction. Conclusion
With optimized high
resolution ZTE MR imaging and improved image processing, high quality cortical
bone imaging of the human head has been demonstrated on a clinical 3T scanner. The goal is to potentially use this method in applications such as attenuation correction PET/MR, one-stop neurosurgical planning and radiation dose reduction in pediatric patients. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Eley et al., Br J Radiol 2012; 84:272-278. 2. Du et al., NMR Biomed 2013; 26:489-506. 3. Wehrli F. J Magn Reson 2013; 229:35-48. 4. Wiesinger et al., Magn Reson Med 2016; 75:107–114.