5081

ADRIMO: Anatomy-DRIven MOdelling of spatial correlation to improve analysis of arterial spin labelling data
David Owen1, Andrew Melbourne2, David L Thomas2,3, Joanne Beckmann4, Jonathan Rohrer3, Neil Marlow4, and Sebastien Ourselin2

1Translational Imaging Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Translational Imaging Group, University College London, 3Dementia Research Centre, University College London, 4Institute for Women's Health, University College London

Synopsis

Arterial spin labelling (ASL) offers valuable measurements of perfusion in the brain and other organs. However, ASL data have low SNR and are prone to partial volume effects. We present a Bayesian model of anatomically-derived spatial correlation in ASL data (ADRIMO), which improves the accuracy of perfusion estimates and hence improves the analysis of ASL data. The method is assessed experimentally by examining ASL images from a cohort of 130 preterm-born adolescents.

Introduction

Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL) characterises the perfusion of oxygenated blood in the brain and other organs, offering valuable information about cerebrovascular health. Unfortunately, ASL data are noisy and the large voxel size leads to significant partial volume effects1,2,3. Here, we show that using an anatomically-based Bayesian model of spatial correlation can achieve significantly more accurate perfusion estimates, hence improving statistical power in ASL data analysis. The method uses automated anatomical parcellations to define anatomical regions, meaning it is data-driven4. We use this method to investigate differences in cerebral perfusion in a group of young adults born extremely preterm.

Methods

We formulate a probabilistic model, relating ASL images, $$$y$$$, to the underlying perfusion values, $$$f$$$, at each voxel. We assume each region (as defined by the lobar parcellation) contains voxels with normally distributed perfusion values, with mean $$$\mu$$$ and covariance $$$\Sigma_\mu$$$, which are also inferred in the model:

$$p(f, \mu, \Sigma_\mu | y) \propto p(y | f, \mu, \Sigma_\mu) p(f, \mu, \Sigma_\mu) = p(y | f) p(f | \mu, \Sigma_\mu) p(\mu, \Sigma_\mu)$$

$$p(f | \mu, \Sigma_\mu) = \prod_i \mathcal{N}(f_i; \mu,\Sigma_\mu)$$

To find the data likelihood, we integrate the signal model, $$$g(f)$$$, over the Gaussian measurement noise $$$\sigma_n$$$:

$$p(y | f) = \int_{\sigma_n}\prod_j \mathcal{N}(y_j; g(f),\sigma_n)$$

As in a similar method for IVIM4 we use a Monte Carlo Markov Chain to jointly infer the per-voxel perfusion and the underlying per-region distribution parameters. Here we use the ASL signal model of Buxton et al5, with regions defined by a lobar parcellation of the brain6. We use a noninformative Jeffreys prior for $$$p(\mu,\Sigma_\mu)$$$.

For experimental validation, we use imaging data from a cohort of 130 adolescents at 19 years of age. Data for 81 extremely preterm (EP) adolescents (F/M=48/33, mean birth gestation= 24.8±0.8wks) and 49 (F/M=31/18) term-born socioeconomically matched peers were acquired on a 3T Phillips Achieva. We acquired Pseudo-Continuous ASL (PCASL) for 30 control-label pairs with PLD=1800ms+41ms/slice, label duration τ=1650ms (resolution 3x3x5mm) using 2D EPI. We compare the first half of the dataset with the second to perform test-retest experiments, comparing ADRIMO’s repeatability with simple voxelwise fitting and 5mm FWHM smoothing. Subsequently, we use the full dataset to show ADRIMO more reliably detects perfusion differences between groups. We investigate differences by gestational age at birth (GAB), by sex and by method of delivery (caesarean). Finally we explore correlations between haematocrit levels and GM perfusion.

Results and Discussion

Example perfusion images are shown in Figure 1. Visually, ADRIMO is smoother than voxelwise fitting and less smooth than blurring. This is unsurprising: ADRIMO uses broad spatial correlations on the scale of regions, rather than localised correlations on the scale of voxel neighbourhoods. High smoothness may be undesirable: blurring neighbouring values may drag voxels away from their true values. Test-retest correlations are significantly higher in ADRIMO, compared with standard voxelwise fitting (R=0.69±0.13 vs R=0.57±0.17, P=0.0026) and Gaussian smoothing (R=0.62±0.20, P=0.023), as summarised in Figure 2.

All methods, when used to estimate average GM perfusion, show significant differences between terms and preterms (P=1.8E-4 and d=0.70 with ADRIMO, perfusion T/P 53.6±10.8/46.8±9.0 ml/100g/min, P<0.05 with all). All methods find differences between preterm males and preterm females (P=3.5E-5 and d=0.88 with ADRIMO, perfusion F/M 52.3±10.2/44.9±8.6 ml/100g/min, P<0.01 with all), and no method shows significant differences between term-born males and females (P>0.05). ADRIMO shows these differences with higher statistical power in each case. This could reduce sample sizes, or allow more certain conclusions for a given sample size. Similarly, all three methods show no significant difference between Caesarean/non-Caesarean (P>0.05), where no difference is expected.

Plots of perfusion against haematocrit and GAB are shown in Figure 4. Testing for rank correlation between perfusion and haematocrit reveals a negative relationship in male and female subjects. This remains after correction for GM volume (R=-0.43, -0.52 respectively, P=0.0058, 0.0042 with ADRIMO and P<0.02 for all methods). Testing for correlation between perfusion and GAB within preterms does not reveal an association, suggesting that despite the perfusion difference between groups, there is little evidence for this increasing with the extent of prematurity — at least within the spread of three gestational weeks covered by this dataset.

Conclusion

Parcellations can inform the analysis of ASL data through the use of a novel probabilistic model. This approach significantly improves test-retest repeatability and discriminative power, which in combination are strong evidence of improved accuracy in the perfusion estimates. In this cohort, GM perfusion is negatively correlated with haematocrit levels. There are significant differences in GM perfusion between male and female preterm-born subjects, as well as between term- and preterm-born subjects of either sex.

Acknowledgements

DO and DLT are supported by the UCL Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre (PR/ylr/18575). We would also like to acknowledge the MRC (MR/J01107X/1), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the EPSRC (EP/H046410/1) and the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC UCLH/UCL High Impact Initiative BW.mn.BRC10269). This work is supported by the EPSRC-funded UCL Centre for Doctoral Training in Medical Imaging (EP/L016478/1). The Dementia Research Centre is supported by Alzheimer’s Research UK, Brain Research Trust, and The Wolfson Foundation.

References

[1] Asllani, I., Ajna B., and Brown, T. R. "Regression algorithm correcting for partial volume effects in arterial spin labeling MRI." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 60.6 (2008): 1362-1371.

[2] Alsop, D. C., Detre, J. A., Golay, X., Günther, M., Hendrikse, J., Hernandez-Garcia, L., ... & Osch, M. J. (2015). Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 73(1), 102-116.

[3] Chappell, M. A., Groves, A. R., MacIntosh, B. J., Donahue, M. J., Jezzard, P., & Woolrich, M. W. (2011). Partial volume correction of multiple inversion time arterial spin labeling MRI data. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 65(4), 1173-1183.

[4] Orton, M. R., Collins, D. J., Koh, D. M., & Leach, M. O. (2014). Improved intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of diffusion weighted imaging by data driven Bayesian modeling. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 71(1), 411-420.

[5] Buxton, R. B., Frank, L. R., Wong, E. C., Siewert, B., Warach, S., & Edelman, R. R. (1998). A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 40(3), 383-396.

[6] Cardoso, M. J., Modat, M., Wolz, R., Melbourne, A., Cash, D., Rueckert, D., & Ourselin, S. (2015). Geodesic information flows: spatially-variant graphs and their application to segmentation and fusion. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 34(9), 1976-1988.

Figures

Top row: example perfusion maps in axial slices. Left is voxelwise, centre is smoothed, right is ADRIMO. Bottom row: difference images between method and voxelwise fitting.

Grey matter test-retest correlations over all 130 subjects. ADRIMO has significantly higher correlation coefficients than voxelwise (P=0.0026) or smoothed (P=0.023) images.

Average GM perfusion distributions estimated using each method, t-tested between groups. Left compares preterm males (N=33) and preterm females (N=48), centre compares terms (N=49) and preterms (N=81), right compares subjects who did (N=15) and did not undergo caesareans (N=46). All methods agree, with ADRIMO always offering higher statistical power where differences are found to exist.

Scatter plots showing the relationships between perfusion and haematocrit, and perfusion and gestational age at birth. Top left: perfusion-hct, male (N=51); top right: perfusion-hct, female (N=79); bottom left: perfusion-gab, preterm male (N=33); bottom right: perfusion-gab, female (N=48).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)
5081