Thomas Lindner1, Naomi Larsen1, Olav Jansen1, and Michael Helle2
1Clinic for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany, 2Tomographic Imaging Department, Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany
Synopsis
Selective Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) is established
to perform non-contrast enhanced flow territory mapping. In super-selective
pCASL only one artery of interest is labeled while the efficiency in
contralateral arteries is near zero. To
obtain a holistic picture of all brain perfusion territories, the label and
control experiments have to be repeated for each artery, prolonging scan time.
In this study, it is hypothesized that due to the (almost) negligible signal
contribution of non-tagged arteries, selective perfusion images can be
calculated from a single scan that is performed without the acquisition of
control images.
Introduction
Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) is an established
technique to perform non-contrast enhanced MR perfusion imaging. Modifications
of the labeling module allow for the selective visualization of individual
brain feeding arteries, e.g. the internal carotid arteries (ICAs) and vertebral
arteries (VAs). Generally, ASL approaches rely on two acquisitions, namely a “label”
(inversion) and a “control” (without inversion) condition, which are
subsequently subtracted to remove the static tissue signal, yielding perfusion
weighted images. In super-selective pCASL only a single artery of interest is
labeled while the labeling efficiency in contralateral arteries is almost zero
[1]. To obtain a holistic picture of brain perfusion using super-selective tagging,
the label and control experiment have to be repeated for each selectively
labeled artery, prolonging total scan time. In the present study, it is
hypothesized that due to the (almost negligible) signal contribution of
non-tagged arteries, selective perfusion images can be calculated without an
additionally acquired control image by using the tag images only.Materials and Methods
Six healthy volunteers underwent MR scanning under the
general protocol for sequence development, approved by the local ethical
committee. Imaging was performed on a Philips 3T Achieva (Philips, Best, The
Netherlands) scanner using a standard 32 channel SENSE Head coil. ASL
parameters were: 1800ms Label and 2000ms post labeling delay with background
suppression pulses at 1850ms and 3250ms as recommended in [2]. Image
acquisition consisted of a multislice 2D EPI readout with 2.3*2.3*4mm voxel
size covering 16 slices with a gap of 1.6mm. Planning of the individual
labeling foci for all selected arteries was performed on a low-resolution
time-of-flight scan positioned across the neck. During scanning, the individual
labeling focus positions for each vessel were cycled periodically so that all selective
data acquisitions were performed within a single measurement. For each of the
major arteries (right and left ICA and VAs), 20 images were acquired, resulting
in a total acquisition time of 4:13min. As a comparison, conventional
super-selective ASL with a separate label and control image was performed with
the same parameters and took 8:26 min in total. Non-selective ASL imaging took
3:06 min. In both of the latter methods, perfusion weighted images were
obtained by subtraction of label and control images.
In the presented approach, the flow territories were
calculated by combining the images of the contralateral arteries and
subtracting the image of the tagged artery twice (Figure 1a). The resulting
negative signal of the contralateral arteries is removed via logical indexing. In
order to obtain quantitative information from the perfusion images, the
algorithm presented in [2] was used, after the images were divided by the
square root of 2 to correct for the change in signal-to-noise ratio resulting
from the combination of multiple images [3, 4]. All calculations were performed
using Matlab R2013a (The Mathworks, Natick, MA).Results and Discussion
Images of all individual perfusion territories could be
obtained. The resulting quantitative images are in concordance with conventional
super-selective as well as with non-selective ASL (Figure 2). To acquire
selective perfusion territories using super-selective ASL, at least two image
acquisitions are needed. Generally, this is achieved by acquiring a label image
with a matching control image. However, the need for acquiring two corresponding
images increases scan time and makes the acquisition prone to patient motion. The
presented method demonstrates that the information of the contralateral (non-tagged)
arteries can be used for calculating selective perfusion territories instead of
using an additionally acquired control image when three individual arteries are
labeled. In cerebrovascular diseases, however, the flow territories of additional
intracranial arteries need to be visualized selectively. It is possible to use
super-selective ASL to label such arteries, which will require increasing the
number of tagging acquisitions as well as adapting the decoding scheme. Such
approach is subject to further investigations. As this calculation assumes
perfect inversion within a single artery and zero inversion outside, the actual
effects of the varying labeling efficiency in contralateral arteries have to be
further investigated as well.Conclusion
In this study, a method to post-process super-selective
ASL images using only the label data is presented which makes it possible to
generate perfusion weighted images of individual flow territories without the
necessity to acquire additional control images. Using this approach, flow
territory mapping can be performed in shorter scan times than using conventional
super-selective ASL.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Helle M et. al. Magn Reson
Med 2010;64:777-86
[2] Alsop D et. al. Magn Reson
Med 2014;73:102-16
[3] Günther M. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:671-5
[4] Gudbjartsson H and Patz S.
Magn Reson Med 1995;34:910-4