Keizo Tanitame1, Takahiro Sueoka2, Yukiko Honda3, Yuji Takahashi3, Akira Naito1, and Kazuo Awai3
1Chugoku Rosai Hospital, Kure, Japan, 2Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan, 3Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
Synopsis
Radial images through
the center of the acetabulum in the plane including the entire acetabular rim are
useful for evaluating acetabular labral injuries, and those perpendicular to
the center of the femoral head
through the central axis of the femoral neck
enable evaluation of the morphological findings of femoroacetabular
impingement. Continuous thin-slice
images from optimized 3D fat-suppressed multi-echo
gradient-recalled-echo allow
360° radial
reformation of hip joints, offering precise evaluation of the range of acetabular labral
injury and femoroacetabular
impingement morphology.
PURPOSE
The evaluation of acetabular labral injuries
and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is difficult using standard two-dimensional
(2D) axial, coronal, and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).1,2
Advantages of three-dimensional
(3D) isotropic acquisitions of MRI include a high signal-to-noise ratio, high spatial
resolution, and the ability to yield high-quality multiplanar images from the
original acquisition dataset. The first purpose of this study was to evaluate the
diagnostic accuracy of radial reformation through the center of the acetabulum
perpendicular to the plane across the entire acetabular rim (type-1 radial
reformation; Fig. 1) in 3D fat-suppressed multi-echo
gradient-recalled-echo (FS multi-echo GRE) imaging for evaluating
acetabular labral injury by comparison with 2D radial T2*-weighted imaging
(T2*WI).3 The second purpose was to confirm the utility of radial
reformation perpendicular to the central axis of the femoral head and neck (type-2 radial reformation; Fig. 2) in 3D FS multi-echo GRE imaging for evaluating FAI in patients with labral
injury.
METHODS
We examined 19 patients
(mean age, 44.2 ± 13.6 years; 10 men, 9 women) with suspected acetabular labral
injury using a Philips Ingenia 3.0-T system. We optimized axial 3D FS multi-echo GRE
imaging for evaluating acetabular labral injury (TR, 32 ms;
TE, 2.3, 5.6, 8.9, 12.2, and 15.5 ms; flip angle, 7°; slice thickness, 0.5 mm;
pixel size, 0.5 ´ 0.5 mm). We also acquired 2-mm slice thickness
type-1 and type-2 radial reformations at 3°
intervals of 3D FS multi-echo GRE imaging of the right diseased hip joints
of 13 patients and the left diseased hip joints of 6 patients using OsiriX on
Mac OS X. In
addition, we obtained
12 radial slices at 15° intervals of 2D T2*WI through the center of the acetabulum perpendicular
to the plane across the entire acetabular rim (TR, 400 ms; TE,
18.4 ms; flip angle, 30°; slice thickness, 4 mm; pixel size, 0.5 ´ 0.5 mm). The range of acetabular labral injury of
each patient was evaluated by the consensus decision of two experienced radiologists. Two weeks after interpreting 2D
T2*WI, the same radiologists evaluated labral injury on type-1 radial
reformation of 3D FS multi-echo GRE
imaging. Diagnostic accuracy using the type-1 radial reformation was
assessed in comparison with 2D radial T2*WI. The same radiologists estimated the
degree of FAI using type-2 radial reformation of 3D FS multi-echo GRE imaging. An α angle over 55° was considered indicative of
cam-type FAI.4 Pincer-type FAI was
diagnosed based on over-coverage of the acetabulum.2
RESULTS
We identified 2 patients with no labral injury, and labral injury in the
anterosuperior zone of acetabula in 10 patients, posterosuperior zone in 3
patients, posteroinferior zone in 1 patient, and both anterosuperior and
posterosuperior zones in 3 patients from type-1 radial reformation of 3D FS multi-echo GRE imaging and 2D radial T2*WI. The rate
of diagnostic concordance was 100% (19/19). In each patient with acetabular
labral injury, the injured range demonstrated on type-1 radial reformation of
3D FS multi-echo GRE imaging included the injured angles on 2D radial T2*WI (Table 1, Fig. 3). Type-1
radial reformation of 3D FS multi-echo GRE imaging revealed two small labral injuries not
detected on 2D radial T2*WI in 1 patient. We could evaluate FAI in all patients (no FAI, n=6; cam-type, n=6;
pincer-type, n=4; combined cam- and pincer-type, n=3) using type-2 radial
reformation of 3D FS multi-echo GRE
imaging (Table 1, Fig. 4).
.
DISCUSSION
Due to reduced partial volume averaging by acquiring thin
continuous slices, 3D pulse sequences are
advantageous in evaluating abnormalities of the ball-and-socket-shaped hip
joint, and 3D multi-echo GRE imaging yields higher
signal-intensity images than conventional 2D T2*WI with single echo acquisition.
Radial reformation at small intervals of 3D FS multi-echo
GRE imaging shows the precise range of acetabular labral injury in comparison
with 2D radial T2*WI. Moreover, radial reformation perpendicular to the central axis of the
femoral head and neck permits a better appreciation
of hip joint contours than X-ray films, and allows evaluation of cam- and
pincer-type FAI. Potential disadvantages of 3D GRE imaging include
relatively long acquisition times and inherent sensitivity to susceptibility
artifacts, which may be problematic in postoperative imaging.5 One weakness
of this study was the lack comparison with findings from MRI and arthroscopy.CONCLUSION
Type-1 and -2 radial reformation of 3D FS multi-echo GRE imaging were
useful for evaluating the range of acetabular labral injury and determining
whether patients with labral injury have
FAI, respectively.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Park SY, Park JS, Jin W, et al. Diagnosis of acetabular labral tears: comparison
of three-dimensional intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with
two-dimensional MR arthrography at 3.0 T. Acta Radiologica. 2013;54(1):75-82.
2. Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C, et al. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR
arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240(3):778-785.
3. Horii M, Kubo T,
Hirasawa Y. Radial MRI of the hip with moderate osteoarthritis. Bone & Joint Journal. 2000;82(3):364-368.
4. Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME,
Rybak L, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(5):1260-1262.
5. Naraghi A, White LM.
Three-dimensional MRI of the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(3):W283-W293.