In general, it is difficult to obtain functional information about water and lipid in tissues at the same time. We, therefore, developed a novel method using chemical shift displacement and recovery-based separation of lipid tissue (SPLIT) with different inversion times, echo times, and b-values to simultaneously acquire diffusion, perfusion, T1, T2, and lipid fraction in the calf. All parameters obtained with the SPLIT were consistent with previously reported values. This method enables simultaneous acquisition of functional information without special pulse sequence.
INTRODUCTION
Functional information about water and lipid in tissues, e.g., diffusion, perfusion, relaxation time, and lipid fraction (LF) obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful to assess the physiological conditions, physical properties, and tissue metabolism.1-3 However, it is difficult to obtain all this information at the same time.4,5 Therefore, to simultaneously acquire these functional information, we developed a novel method using chemical shift displacement and recovery-based separation of lipid tissue (SPLIT) with different inversion time (TI), echo time (TE), and b-values. Additionally, diffusion, perfusion, T1, T2, and LF in the calf were evaluated.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1 depicts examples of water and lipid diffusion-weighted images using the proposed SPLIT imaging with and without inversion pulse. The SPLIT method allowed sufficient separation of water and lipid images of the calf, and the SPLIT with inversion pulse effectively suppressed olefinic signals. Representative diffusion parameters, T1, and T2 maps for one subject are shown in Figure 2. In addition, the mean ADC, T1, and T2 in the TA, TB, and SF are presented in Table 1. The ADCs of the TB and SF (lipid diffusion) were 0.02 ± 0.02 × 10-3 mm2/s and 0.04 ± 0.02 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively, which were much lower than that of the TA (water diffusion, 1.67 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s). Moreover, the Dp, Dr, and LF values of the TA were 20.1 ± 10.6 × 10-3 mm2/s, 1.60 ± 0.07 × 10-3 mm2/s, and 3.3 ± 2.2%, respectively. All these values were in general agreement with previously reported data obtained from water and lipid images scanned separately,6-9 supporting the validity of our method.1. Liimatainen T, et al. NMR Biomed. 2009; 22: 272-279.
2. Cao P, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 73: 59-69.
3. Biffar A, et al. Invest Radiol. 2011; 46: 601-609.
4. Burakiewicz J, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 73: 964-972.
5. Hamilton G, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 42: 1538-1543.
6. Qi J, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 27: 212-217.
7. Varghese J, et al. NMR Biomed. 2015; 28: 998-1008.
8. Lehnert A, et al. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 22: 39-46.
9. Alizai H, et al. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 1592-1600.