In this work we evaluate the potential benefits of parallel transmission for fetal imaging in reducing local SAR and mitigating flip angle inhomogeneities. Our results show that compared to single channel transmission, using 2 channel parallel transmission with a 2 port birdcage coil, local SAR can be reduced by a factor of up to 5 and flip angle inhomogeneity can be mitigated by up to 66% for realistically long RF pulses.
EM Simulations: A pregnant body model with 7 month gestational age (7) is simulated inside the 2-port, 32-rung birdcage Skyra coil model (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using Sim4Life (ZMT, Zurich, Switzerland) to obtain the electromagnetic fields (Figure.1). The body model is positioned to center the fetus brain at the isocenter of the coil. The matchings of the ports are less than -14 dB when loaded with the pregnant body model. The resulting B1+ field has a max/min ratio of 2.9 in the isocenter slice inside the body model.
Pulse Design: The electric fields are extracted and the computed SAR matrices in the body are compressed into virtual observation points (VOPs) (8). The VOPs and the B1+ fields are fed into a slice selective high flip angle local and global SAR constrained RF pulse design algorithm using magnitude least squares (MLS) optimization (9) to design 90° excitation as well as 180° refocusing pulses. A Hanning windowed sinc subpulse with a time bandwidth product of 2 and a duration of 4.1 ms (2.1 ms) is chosen for the refocusing (excitation) pulses. A duty cycle of 10% was assumed in calculating the SAR values. The standard circularly polarized birdcage mode pulse is scaled to give an average flip angle of 90° and 180° for a more fair comparison of the pulse performances. For the same purpose, a second CP BC mode pulse whose pulse length is matched to the 2 spoke pTx pulse is evaluated. Off resonance is assumed to be zero, which is an assumption that gets worse as the pulse duration becomes longer (2 spoke pulses).
1. Kikuchi S, Saito K, Takahashi M, Ito K. Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2010;55(8):2411-2426.
2. Hand JW, Li Y, Hajnal JV. Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure. Phys Med Biol 2010;55(4):913-930.
3. Pediaditis M, Leitgeb N, Cech R. RF-EMF exposure of fetus and mother during magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2008;53(24):7187-7195.
4. Cannie M. Potential Heating Effect in the Gravid Uterus by Using 3-T MR Imaging Protocols: Experimental Study in Miniature Pigs. Radiology 2016;000(0).
5. Filippi CG, johnson A, Nickerson JP, Sussman B, Gonyea J, Andrews T. Fetal Imaging with Multitransmit MR at 3.0T Preliminary Findings. 2010. p 2023.
6. Murbach M, Neufeld E, Samaras T, Córcoles J, Robb FJ, Kainz W, Kuster N. Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2016.
7. Marie-Christine Gosselin, Esra Neufeld, Heidi Moser, Eveline Huber, Silvia Farcito, Livia Gerber, Maria Jedensjo, Isabel Hilber, Fabienne Di Gennaro, Bryn Lloyd, Emilio Cherubini, Dominik Szczerba, Kainz; W, Kuster N. Development of a New Generation of High-Resolution Anatomical Models for Medical Device Evaluation: The Virtual Population 3.0 Physics in Medicine and Biology 2014;59(18):5287-5303.
8. Eichfelder G, Gebhardt M. Local specific absorption rate control for parallel transmission by virtual observation points. Magn Reson Med 2011;66(5):1468-1476.
9. Setsompop K, Wald LL, Alagappan V, Gagoski BA, Adalsteinsson E. Magnitude least squares optimization for parallel radio frequency excitation design demonstrated at 7 Tesla with eight channels. Magn Reson Med 2008;59(4):908-915.
10. Guerin B, Gebhardt M, Serano P, Adalsteinsson E, Hamm M, Pfeuffer J, Nistler J, Wald LL. Comparison of simulated parallel transmit body arrays at 3 T using excitation uniformity, global SAR, local SAR, and power efficiency metrics. Magn Reson Med 2015;73(3):1137-1150.