Christopher W. Roy1,2, Mike Seed3,4, and Christopher K. Macgowan1,2
1Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Physiology and Experimental Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital for Sick Children, ON, Canada, 4Pediatric and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Recent advances in cardiac MRI have enabled
powerful new methods for assessing the fetal heart in utero. Using a novel reconstruction framework, combining methods
for motion correction, retrospective gating, and accelerated imaging, motion-robust
CINE images are reconstructed and compared to conventional static MRI of the
fetal heart. Preliminary evaluation of fetal congenital heart disease with this
technique is demonstrated in multi-slice axial acquisitions of four subjects.
Introduction
In pregnancies where fetal cardiovascular abnormalities
are present, in utero imaging has
become an integral facet of patient care. While ultrasound is the primary modality
for fetal cardiac imaging, there is growing interest in using MRI to study the
fetal heart (1,2). Studies using
static MRI are possible but may be affected by artifact from maternal
respiration, fetal cardiac motion, and gross fetal movement (3). Recent advances to overcome
these limitations and obtain dynamic images of the fetal heart include retrospective
cardiac gating (4,5), accelerated imaging
(6), and motion
correction (7). Here we present our
preliminary experience using such methods to visualize fetal congenital heart
disease. The image quality of this novel reconstruction approach was scored,
relative to static MRI, by an expert reviewer.Methods
Continuous golden angle radial MRI data were
acquired in five human fetuses. For each volunteer, ten axial slices were prescribed spanning the heart on a Siemens 1.5T
clinical system using both body and spine matrices (Avanto Fit,
Siemens Healthcare – Germany). One subject was excluded
from further analysis due to poor slice prescription. Scans were performed free-breathing with the following acquisition
parameters: flip angle: 70°, acquired spokes: 3000, TR: 4.95 ms, samples per
spoke: 256, field-of-view: 256 x 256 mm2, spatial resolution: 1 x 1
x 4 mm3, and scan length: ~15 s per slice.
Each
acquisition was reconstructed in two ways. First, static images were reconstructed
using only the first 400 spokes (Nyquist sampling criterion). These
reconstructions represented the conventional method for fetal cardiac MRI (3). Second, CINE reconstructions of the entire 3000 spokes were
performed using a novel imaging approach wherein an initial real-time
reconstruction of the data was used to visually assess and reject data
undergoing through-plane motion (5), calculate in-plane motion using rigid registration (7), and extract a cardiac gating signal (4). The original data were then motion corrected, sorted by cardiac
phase and reconstructed using compressed sensing to produce motion-robust CINE
images (6,8).
For
each subject, a congenital heart defect was identified by ultrasound prior to
the MRI examination and confirmed at birth. The gestational ages at the time of
the MRI and the post-natal diagnoses are listed in Table 1a. Static and CINE images were presented as DICOMS
and analyzed by an expert reviewer (MS). To assess the quality of static and CINE images,
each method was evaluated based on a three-point scoring system of the nine
cardiac structures listed in Table 1b. Three points were awarded for clear
identification of anatomical structures, two were awarded for identifiable
structures obscured by artifact and one point was awarded for non-identifiable
structures. For each case, the static images were scored first and then the
CINE images were scored for the same patient. The added value provided by CINE
imaging was then determined by comparing the image quality scores for each case
and the difference between the two methods was evaluated using a Wilcoxon test.Results
Table 1b displays image scores for both static and
CINE images of the fetal heart. Overall, the CINE images scored significantly
higher using a Wilcoxon test (p = 10-4). Similarly, the average
score for individual structures was consistently higher for CINEs except for
arch sidedness which was equally assessed by static images.
Figs.
2-5 show both static and animated CINE reconstructions (click on figures to
play videos) of representative slices from the four subjects. Overall, image
quality for CINE reconstructions is noticeably better than for static images,
echoing the tabulated scores. For subject 1 (Fig. 2), most cardiac structures
could be identified from the static images, due to the minor motion observed in
real-time reconstructions of this acquisition. However, quickly moving dynamic
structures such as the atrioventricular valves (example denoted by the black arrow
in Fig. 2 slice 5) and a right ventricle diverticulum (white arrow in Fig. 2 slice
5) are better visualized by the CINE images. Conversely, for subject 2 (Fig. 3)
the presence of more dramatic motion resulted in noticeable blurring of the
great vessels (Fig. 3 slice 7 & 8), which impeded identification of their
arrangement. Both Figs. 4 and 5 show further examples of abnormal
configurations of the great vessels and once again the motion-robust CINE
reconstructions provide improved visualization of dynamic cardiac anatomy.Discussion
Using this novel approach to motion-robust CINE reconstruction,
fetal congenital heart defects were evaluated in utero with improved visualization of cardiac structures relative
to static MRI. These preliminary results motivate studies in a larger fetal
population and comparison to ultrasound to determine the value of this new
approach.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Godfrey ME., Messing B., Cohen SM.,
Valsky D V., Yagel S. Functional assessment of the fetal heart: a review.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39(2):131–44. Doi: 10.1002/uog.9064.
2. Pugash D., Brugger PC., Bettelheim D.,
Prayer D. Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: The comparative value of each
modality in prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 2008;68(2):214–26. Doi:
10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.031.
3. Dong S-Z., Zhu M., Li F. Preliminary
experience with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluation of fetal
cardiovascular anomalies. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15(1):40. Doi:
10.1186/1532-429X-15-40.
4. Roy CW., Seed M., van Amerom JFP., et
al. Dynamic imaging of the fetal heart using metric optimized gating. Magn
Reson Med 2013;70(6):1598–607. Doi: 10.1002/mrm.24614.
5. Chaptinel J., Mivelaz Y., Yerly J., et
al. A Golden-Angle Acquisition Coupled with k-t Sparse SENSE Reconstruction for
Fetal Self Retro-Gated Cine Cardiac MRI: an In Vivo Feasibility Study. Int Soc
Magn Reson Med 2016;(3):459.
6. Roy CW., Seed M., Macgowan CK.
Accelerated MRI of the fetal heart using compressed sensing and metric
optimized gating. Magn Reson Med 2016;0:1–11. Doi: 10.1002/mrm.26290.
7. van Amerom JFP., Kuklisova Murgasova M.,
Price AN., et al. Fetal cardiac cine imaging from motion-corrected
super-resolution reconstruction of highly-accelerated real-time MRI. Proc Int
Soc Magn Reson Med 2016:458.
8. Roy CW., Seed
M., Macgowan CK. High resolution multislice imaging of the fetal heart using
MOG and iGRASP. Scmr 2016;18(Suppl 1):1–2. Doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-P44.