Feifei Qu1, Uday Krishnamurthy1,2, Brijesh Kumar Yadav1,2, Ewart Mark Haacke1,2, and Jaladhar Neelavalli1,2
1Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
Synopsis
Two self-gating approaches to reconstruct
free-breathing cardiovascular image generated by Golden Angle radial trajectory
MRI were compared. The results show that both central k-space magnitude and phase self-gated image have comparable
quality with breathhold Cartesian CINE image, and the phase self-gating signal
is less sensitive to the coil sensitivity compared to the magnitude based self-gating
signal.
Introduction
When acquiring multiple slices through the heart
in cardiovascular MRI (CMRI), successive breath-holds are typically needed
which becomes (progressively) difficult as the number of slices increase. Free-breathing
approaches with self-gating (SG) were developed to address this issue. Due to
the time-of-flight effect from the blood motion, and/or changes in the
structure of the heart during the cardiac cycle, the central k-space signal changes and thus can
serve as the self-gating signal. Non-Cartesian trajectories, like radial
trajectory, are widely used in self-gated 2D and 3D CMRI techniques.1, 2 While
previous literature points out that both amplitude and the phase of the k-space center can be used for SG, results
from amplitude-only based SG were reported.3, 4 In this work, we compare
SG reconstructions based on amplitude versus phase of the k-space center in a gradient echo sequence with a radial sampling
scheme. The motivation for exploring phase-only based SG is the difficulty
introduced by phased array coil sensitivities. While amplitude signal is significantly
modulated by spatially varying coil-sensitivities, phase on the other hand is less
affected. We further evaluate whether a phase-only based SG (PSG) approach can
resolve breathing versus heart motion which has been shown to be possible previously
with amplitude based SG (ASG).2-4 Reconstruction efficacy between
different approaches was evaluated by visual comparison as well as by comparing
left ventricular area, taking conventional breath-hold Cartesian-cine (C-CINE)
acquisition as reference. Purpose
To compare central k-space amplitude-only (ASG) vs. phase-only based SG (PSG)
reconstructions in CMRI.Method
Two healthy adult volunteers underwent cardiac
imaging on a 3.0T Siemens Verio scanner. First, C-CINE (FLASH) data was
acquired with the following scanning parameters: TR/TE:50.4/2.42ms, flip angle:
15⁰, and voxel size: 2.2x1.8x8 mm3, Navg = 1. A spoiled gradient echo sequence with radial
sampling scheme and Golden angle increments in spoke angles was implemented with
the following scan parameters: TR/TE: 14/4.72ms, flip angle: 35⁰, Nr =
720, Np: 1005, dynamic
repetitions: 12, and voxel size: 0.5x0.5x8 mm3, scan time:
2.3min/slice, Navg = 1. For easy reference, the sequence is dubbed GARAGE - for
Golden Angle sampled Radial Gradient Echo. All the data was collected using a 6
channel flex coil along with a 4 channel spine coil. Data were acquired with
70% partial echo.Data Analysis
The central k-space
magnitude profile and phase profile were acquired and Fourier transformed to
evaluate their temporal frequency content. Using a notch filter, the respiratory
and cardiac frequency components were then separated by taking signal peaks in
the neighborhood of 0.25Hz and 1.25Hz respectively for PSG and ASG signals. The
periodic signal (respiratory or cardiac) was then employed to identify the
cardiac (or respiratory) cycle by detecting valleys of the function and the
duration between two valley points representing one heartbeat/respiration. The GARAGE
data was reconstructed into the same number of cardiac phases as the C-CINE
image (25 phases - volunteer A, 13 phases – volunteer B). From the same
datasets, two respiratory phases – inspiration and expiration, were
reconstructed, for systole and diastolic cardiac phases using the SG
approach. Results
Signal profiles from the amplitude and phase
components of the k-space center from
one coil, are plotted in Figure 1. Signal variation corresponding to
respiratory motion as well as cardiac motion can be clearly visualized in both
phase and amplitude. However, in another coil, only phase is seen to show
consistent sensitivity to respiratory motion (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows the comparison
of PSG and ASG reconstructions with the conventional C-CINE data for a 4-chamber
view acquisition. The PSG and ASG reconstructions were both of comparable
quality to the C-CINE data, but with higher spatial resolution. Figure 4 shows
the inspiration and expiration PSG reconstructions of the heart in the short
axis view, at systole and diastole. Figure 5 shows the relative volume changes of
the left ventricle measured over the cardiac cycle from the PSG and ASG
reconstructions and the C-CINE data. The volume-change curves are almost
identical to one another confirming that ASG and PSG provide accurate and equivalent
quality free-breathing reconstructions.Discussion and Conclusion
In this work, using explicit examples, we
compared the efficacy of k-space
center’s amplitude vs. phase based self-gating signal in reconstructing cardiac
MRI images under free-breathing conditions. We found that both approaches can
provide equal quality reconstructions when the signal amplitude is high.
However, k-space center’s phase based
self-gating signal provides an advantage when coil sensitivity profiles affect
the amplitude sensitivity to motion. An approach where information from both
the ASG and PSG data are combined may provide optimal self -triggering for imaging
with free-breathing cardiac MRI. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Liu J,
Spincemaille P, Codella NCF, et al, 2010. Respiratory and cardiac self-gated
free-breathing cardiac CINE imaging with multiecho 3D hybrid
radial SSFP acquisition. Magnetic
resonance in medicine. 2010;63(5):1230-1237.
2. Feng L, Axel L,
Chandarana H, et al. XD-GRASP: Golden-angle radial MRI with reconstruction of extra
motion-state dimensions using compressed sensing. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2016;75(2):775-788.
3. Larson AC, White RD, Laub G, et al. Self-gated
cardiac cine MRI. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 2004;51(1):93-102.
4. Hiba B, Richard N, Janier M, et al. Cardiac and respiratory double self-gated cine MRI in the mouse at 7 T. Magnetic
resonance in medicine. 2006;55(3):506-513.