Christoph Birkl1, Silvia Budday2, Gerhard Sommer3, Melanie Bauer2, Paul Steinmann2, Johannes Haybaeck4,5, Ellen Kuhl6, Gerhard A. Holzapfel3,7, Franz Fazekas1, Stefan Ropele1, and Christian Langkammer1
1Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuermberg, Erlangen, Germany, 3Institute of Biomechanics, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria, 4Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, 5Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany, 6Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering, Stanford University, CA, United States, 7Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Synopsis
In this study, we investigated the mechanical
stiffness of human brain tissue assessed by triaxial testing of post-mortem
tissue specimens in relation to magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and
diffusion tensor MRI. Our results showed a strong inverse correlation of MTR
and FA with the tissue stiffness. Anisotropy of the stiffness was not observed,
which indicates that the neuronal fiber orientation does not mechanically
support the tissue.
Introduction
There is increasing interest in understanding the
mechanical properties of human brain tissue and their influence on the
formation of cortical folding during development or in pathological conditions
such as traumatic brain injury1,2. In myocardial tissue or muscle collagen and muscle
fibers are structurally supporting the stiffness3. To what extent fiber
orientation and density have also an influence on the stiffness of the orders
of magnitude softer human brain tissue4 is yet unclear. We therefore
assessed the mechanical stiffness (by determining the shear modulus) of
dissected cubic brain specimens via triaxial biomechanical testing and related
the findings to tissue microstructural measures obtained from magnetization
transfer and diffusion MRI.
Methods
Brain tissue from 6 deceased subjects (mean age 61
± 2 years, female/male = 2/4) was included in this study. Immediately after
autopsy, post-mortem MRI was performed at room temperature at 3T (Siemens Magnetom
PRISMA), including a T1-weighted turbo inversion recovery (TIR) sequence (TR = 5390
ms, TE = 10 ms, TI = 500 ms), a 2D rf-spoiled gradient echo (GRE) sequence (TE = 1050 ms, TE = 4.27, 10.4, 15.88, 21.36, 26.84,
32.32 ms, flip angle = 15°) and a MT-weighted sequence, identical with the GRE
sequence parameters, but with an additional off-resonant saturation RF pulse
(offset frequency = 1.2 kHz, duration = 10 ms, flip angle = 500°). All these
sequences were performed with an in-plane resolution of 1x1 mm2 and
a slice thickness of 2 mm. Diffusion weighted images (DWI) were acquired using
a readout-segmented EPI sequence with 1x1x5 mm³ resolution (TR =
3100 ms, TE = 55 ms, b = 1500 s/mm2 applied in 12 directions, 2
averages and GRAPPA = 3). After MRI, the brain was cut in approximately 10
mm-thick coronal slices and tissue cubes with approximately 5x5x5 mm³ were
dissected from the corpus callosum, basal ganglia, white matter and cortex and
then immediately underwent biomechanical testing3. To determine the
mechanical properties under multiple loading modes, the specimens were mounted
onto the triaxial testing device (shear in two orthogonal directions,
compression and tension) as shown in Figure 1. For each sample tested, the
shear modulus µ was determined as a measure for tissue stiffness by calibrating
the modified one-term Ogden strain energy function with the response of all
conducted loading modes simultaneously5. All tests were performed at
room temperature and with quasi-static loading conditions at a speed of v = 2 mm/min.
The directional dependency of the shear moduli was assessed in samples from the
corpus callosum, where specimens were loaded along and perpendicular to the
main fiber direction. Mean magnetization
transfer ratio (MTR) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were determined for each region
dissected for triaxial testing and then correlated with the corresponding shear
modulus.Results
The
shear modulus was biomechanically assessed in a total of 42 specimens (14
corpus callosum, 8 basal ganglia, 12 white matter and 8 cortex). The corpus callosum
showed the lowest shear moduli (µ = 0.35 ± 0.13 kPa), whereas the shear moduli
of the basal ganglia (µ = 0.66 ± 0.22 kPa) were slightly lower than of white
matter (µ = 0.71 ± 0.22 kPa). The highest shear moduli were found in the cortex
(µ = 1.37 ± 0.34 kPa). No directional dependency of the shear moduli with respect
to the corpus callosum fiber orientation was observed. However, the shear modulus
was negatively correlated with MTR (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) and FA (r = 0.77, p
< 0.001).Discussion and Conclusion
Our study
revealed strong inverse correlations between the shear modulus and MTR and FA. In
structures with highly oriented fiber bundles such as the corpus callosum we could
not observe directional dependency of the shear moduli. This is in contrast to
the situation in the heart or in muscles, where collagen and muscle fibers are mechanically
supporting the tissue3. Therefore, we conclude that neuronal fibers
are not supporting the tissue matrix from a mechanical point of view. The
negative correlation of MTR as biomarker for myelination suggests that the high
lipid content of myelinated fibers reduces the mechanical stiffness of brain
tissue.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Budday S, Raybaud C, Kuhl E. A mechanical model predicts
morphological abnormalities in the developing human brain. Sci. Rep.
2014;4:5644. doi: 10.1038/srep05644.
2.
Goriely A, Geers MGD, Holzapfel GA, Jayamohan J, Jérusalem A,
Sivaloganathan S, Squier W, van Dommelen JAW, Waters S, Kuhl E. Mechanics of
the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Biomech. Model.
Mechanobiol. 2015;14:931–965. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0662-4.
3.
Sommer G, Schriefl AJ,
Andrä M, Sacherer M, Viertler C, Wolinski H, Holzapfel GA. Biomechanical
properties and microstructure of human ventricular myocardium. Acta Biomater.
2015;24:172–192. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.031.
4.
Budday S, Sommer G, Birkl C, Langkammer C, Haybaeck J, Kohnert J,
Bauer M, Paulsen F, Steinmann P, Kuhl E, Holzapfel GA. Mechanical
characterization of human brain tissue. Acta Biomater. 2016. doi:
10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.036.
5.
Ogden RW. Large deformation isotropic elasticity – on the correlation
of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc. R. Soc.
London A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1972;A326:565-584.