Olivia Sobczyk1, James Duffin2,3, Adrian P Crawley4, Kevin Sam4, Julien Poublanc4, Lashmi Venkatraghavan3, Daniel M Mandell4, David J Mikulis1,4, and Joseph A Fisher1,2,3
1Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Current methods of measuring
cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) have shown promise for aiding in clinical
diagnosis and management of patients with various neurovascular diseases. However, CVR measurement is currently limited
to a research setting and transition to clinical utility requires a universal
standardized measurement method. Using
BOLD-MRI CO2 measured CVR, we present experimentally developed
concepts for standardization and post processing, which have the potential to
provide a clinically useful brain stress test.
Purpose
To identify the optimal parameters for a
clinically useful stress test to assess cerebrovascular
physiology and pathophysiology by administering CO
2
and monitoring BOLD-MRI.
Introduction
CVR is the
cerebral blood flow (CBF) response to a vasoactive stimulus. CVR can be measured using CO2
as a vasoactive stimulus and the BOLD signal, as a surrogate for the CBF
response. This functional test
identifies the hemodynamic significance of an observed vascular stenosis, an indication
of an enhanced risk of stroke and dementia1,2. However the literature is replete with a
wide array of CO2 and other stress tests, making it impossible to
universally define detection thresholds for abnormal CVR3, or even interpret
gross abnormal findings in a single patient.
Consequently,
the main objective of this work was to apply basic physiologic
principles to systematically optimize the stressor, set
down suggested standardized measurement parameters for CVR testing, and, most
importantly, normalize the test data from an individual subject by comparison
to that of a healthy cohort. Methods and Results
CVR tests were performed over several studies in
150 healthy individuals and 250 patients with steno-occlusive disease. The initial experiments explored the physiology and pathophysiology
of CBF responses to CO2 challenges, and identified the optimal
amplitude and pattern of CO2 administration to detect redistributions
of blood flow in the presence of cerebrovascular lesions. We found the optimal amplitude of CO2
change to be 10-15 mmHg above resting (Figure 1)4. By assembling standardized CVR tests from
normal subjects into an atlas, we were able to score an individual subject’s
CVR data, voxel-by-voxel, relative to the normal range, to create CVR z-maps (Figure
2A)5. Similarly, generating
an atlas containing the normal test-retest CVR range to generate CVR Interval
Difference z-maps (Figure 2B)6 scores the probability of a significant
change in CVR over time in a patient. Finally,
we show that standardized CVR tests can discriminate between lesions that are
hemodynamically significant and those that are not, or that are compensated for
by collateral blood flow.
Discussion and Conclusions
We describe a comprehensive, standardized, vasoactive
stimulus, and post-processing designed for a clinically useful CVR brain stress
test. The data generated is interpretable with respect to underlying physiology
and pathophysiology. This approach is
designed to maximize the probability of identifying abnormality within a single
patient, differences between cohorts, and significant changes in a single
patient over time. In addition, normalization
to a standard atlas allows comparison of data between institutions to enables
multicenter trials.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Ogasawara, K., et al. (2002). Cerebrovascular reactivity to
acetazolamide and outcome in patients with symptomatic internal carotid or
middle cerebral artery occlusion: a xenon-133 single-photon emission computed
tomography study. Stroke. 33(7):1857-1862.
2.
Silvestrini, M., et al. (2011). The role of carotid atherosclerosis in
Alzheimer's disease progression. J
Alzheimers Dis. 25(4):719-726.
3.
Blair, G. W., et al. (2016). Magnetic
resonance imaging for assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity in cerebral
small vessel disease. A systematic review.
J
Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 36(5):833-41.
4.
Sobczyk, O., et al. (2014). A
conceptual model for CO2-induced redistribution of cerebral blood flow with
experimental confirmation using BOLD MRI. NeuroImage. 92(0):56-68.
5.
Sobczyk, O., et al. (2015). Assessing
cerebrovascular reactivity abnormality by comparison to a reference atlas. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 35(2): 213-220.
6.
Sobczyk, O., et al. (2016). Identifying
significant changes in cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 37(5):818-24.