Yu-Chia Cheng1, Yi-Jui Liu2, Yi-Hsiung Lee3,4, Hing-Chiu Chang5, Hui-Chu Chiu6, Ta-Wei Chiu7, Kang Hsu8, Hsian-He Hsu4,9, and Chun-Jung Juan4,9
1Master 's Program of Biomedical Informatics and Biomedical Engineering of Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, Taichung, Taiwan, 2Department of Automatic Control Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China, 3Ph.D. program in Electrical and Communication Engineering in Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China, 4Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 5Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 6Ph.D. program of Technology Management, Chung Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China, 7Department of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 8Department of Dentistry, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 9Department of Radiology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Synopsis
The parotid gland function is evaluated by
gustatory stimulation using scintigraphy in clinic. It is supposed to measure
the water component of parotid gland using PD MRI instead of scintigraphy. In
this study, we initially developed the evaluation of parotid gland function by PD
MRI, and 10 healthy volunteers underwent double echo EPI with gustatory
stimulation. Maximal drop ratio (MDR), time to peak (TTP), drop slope (DS),
recovery slope (RS) and recovery ratio (RR) were calculated. The signal
intensity dropped significantly after gustatory stimulation on PD image
(P<0.01). MRI allows quantification of parotid gland function using
semi-quantitative functional parameters.
Introduction
Since
1975, salivary gland function has been evaluated by scintigraphy [1; 2] , which
allows dynamic measurements of 99mTc-pertechnate in the salivary glands. Comparing
with scintigraphy, MRI
is superior to scintigraphy by the merits of radiation free, high spatial
resolution, and excellent anatomic
characterization. Salivary
gland function has been increasingly evaluated by MRI via characterizing
changes of parotid diffusion [3], perfusion [4], blood flow [5], and blood
oxygenation [6] after gustatory stimulation.
Since
the main function of parotid glands is to secrete saliva, it is plausible that
measuring the changes of water component of the parotid glands might allow
direct evaluation of the parotid gland function. Double echo MRI allows
calculating proton density (PD) of the parotid glands. Theoretically, the change
of parotid PD in gustatory stimulating experiments represents the change of
parotid water component.
The purpose of this prospective study was to
investigate the parotid gland function by semi-quantitative parameters using a high temporal
resolution double echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) pulse sequence.Materials and Methods
This prospective
study was approved by the institution review. A total of 10 healthy volunteers
(M:F=6:4; 35.1 ± 14.1 years) were enrolled in
this pilot study.
All MR scans were performed at a 1.5 T whole-body scanner (GE Healthcare,
Signa HDx, US) using an 8NV head and neck array coil. Axial alternative echo
EPI (TR/TE1/TE2/NEX: 2000 ms/22.2 ms/80 ms/1) were acquired by using an echo
train length of 76, field of view of 240 × 240 mm, matrix size of 128 × 128,
bandwidth of 3906 Hz/pixel, and slice thickness of 5 mm. The in-plane
resolution was 1.875 ×1.875 mm. During the dynamic scans, 10 ml of lemon
juice was manually injected into the oral cavity at the start of the 11th
dynamic scan and was swallowed 40 seconds later. Time signal data of PDWI and T2WI
were initially treated by a low-pass filter with a cut-off frequency of
0.0375Hz, respectively. T2 and PD time data were then computed based on the
corresponding filtered time signal data of PDWI and T2WI, respectively. All
filtered signal-time data were further transformed to ratio-time data according
to equation 1:
……[1]
, where Si denoted the signal
intensity at ith dynamic
scan, So was the baseline
signal intensity averaged from the signal intensity on three time points
covering the start of signal drop, and Sr
represented the signal intensity ratio.
Maximal
drop ratio (MDR), time to peak (TTP), drop slope (DS), recovery slope (RS) and
recovery ratio (RR) were demonstrated in Fig. 1. RS was
defined by the equation 2:
[2]
, where Sr50
referred to the Sr at the
50th dynamic scan since the initial drop on ratio time curve and Srmin equaled to the MDR.
To
evaluate the effect of scan time interval on parotid functional parameters, all
PD time curves were re-plotted using time intervals of 4 × 2i with i ranging from 0 to 4.
Wilcoxon test was applied for group analysis.
Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multi-group comparisons regarding different
time intervals. A P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically
significant.Results
On PDWI (Fig. 2A), PD
(Fig. 2B), and T2WI (Fig. 2C), the signal intensity began to drop as soon as
the start of lemon juice administration at the time point of 11th
scan. The descending trend persisted until reaching the maximal signal drop at
20th dynamic scan. On the other hand, the T2 value of parotid glands
remained unchanged after the gustatory stimulation (Fig. 2D).
PD
ratio time curves of a representative subject with varying time intervals were
illustrated on Fig. 3A. Semi-quantitative parotid functional parameters of all
subjects with varying time intervals were plotted in Fig. 3B. DS, RR, and TTP
showed significant difference between an interval of 4
Discussion
Our study is
different from scintigraphic studies in several aspects. First, our MR study
uses endogenous protons to trace parotid response to gustatory stimulation
rather than exogenous 99mTc-pertechnate isotopes in scintigraphy.
Therefore, our study is superior to scintigraphy as the used MR technique is
free of radiation. Second, our study show an averaged MDR of 8.64%, which is
far lower than the salivary excretion fraction of 99mTc-pertechnate
ranging from 49.5% [7]
to 64.2% [8]
in scintigraphy. Third, our study provides high temporal resolution with a
4-second time interval, which is much shorter than a time interval of 16
seconds to 120 seconds used in scintigraphy [2; 7;
8]. Thanks to the higher temporal resolution, our study might allow more
accurate quantification of both amplitude and time-related semi-quantitative
parameters than the scintigraphy.Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Miss Cheng-Hsuan Juan for contributing the comprehensive cartoon illustration of gustatory stimulation and toilet tank concept.
The study was supported partly from Tri-Service General Hospital under the Grant No. TSGH-C106-036 and partly from the Ministry of Science and Technology, R. O. C. under the Grant No. MOST 105-2314-B-016 -024 -MY2 and MOST 105-2221-E-035 -049 -MY2. This prospective study was approved by the institution review board of Tri-Service General Hospital.References
1.
Ingrand J, Danchot J, Menkes CJ, Delbarre
F, Roucayrol JC (1975) [Quantitative functional exploration of the salivary
glands. Measurement of salivary elimination of technetium 99]. Nouv Presse Med
4:395-400
2.
Loutfi I, Nair MK, Ebrahim AK (2003)
Salivary gland scintigraphy: the use of semiquantitative analysis for uptake
and clearance. J Nucl Med Technol 31:81-85
3.
Habermann
CR, Cramer MC, Graessner J et al (2004) Functional imaging of parotid glands:
diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI before and after stimulation. Rofo
176:1385-1389
4.
Clark
HD, Moiseenko VV, Rackley TP, Thomas SD, Wu JS, Reinsberg SA (2015) Development
of a method for functional aspect identification in parotid using dynamic
contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and concurrent stimulation. Acta Oncol:1-5
5.
Schwenzer
NF, Schraml C, Martirosian P, Boss A, Claussen CD, Schick F (2008) MR
measurement of blood flow in the parotid gland without contrast medium: a
functional study before and after gustatory stimulation. NMR Biomed 21:598-605
6.
Simon-Zoula
SC, Boesch C, De Keyzer F, Thoeny HC (2008) Functional imaging of the parotid
glands using blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD)-MRI at 1.5T and 3T. J
Magn Reson Imaging 27:43-48
7.
Klutmann
S, Bohuslavizki KH, Kroger S et al (1999) Quantitative salivary gland
scintigraphy. J Nucl Med Technol 27:20-26
8.
Gune
S, Yilmaz S, Karalezli A, Aktas A (2010) Quantitative and visual evaluation of
salivary and thyroid glands in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome using
salivary gland scintigraphy: relationship with clinicopathological features of
salivary, lacrimal and thyroid glands. Nucl Med Commun 31:666-672