This study evaluates cerebral perfusion and cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) in impaired glucose tolerance and patients with type-2 diabetes using QUASAR Arterial Spin Labeling. CVR was evaluated as the change in gray matter CBF in response to a pharmacological stimulus. The developed processing pipeline was based on published QUASAR theory, modified to account for excessive motion and partial volume effects. Results show that baseline CBF is within the expected range. In patients with T2DM and IGT there is a significantly lower value of Cerebrovascular Reserve compared to healthy, normoglycaemic individuals.
This study aims to: a) unravel pathophysiological patterns in cerebral perfusion and cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) using QUASAR ASL and b) evaluate changes in brain volume using structural MRI, associated with T2DM and IGT.
Data from 42 volunteers (10 IGT subjects, 12 T2DM patients and 20 matched normoglycaemic controls (HV)) were collected at 3T (Achieva, Philips Healthcare,Best, NL ). The MR protocol comprised of the following scans: 4 QUASAR ASL scans (TR/TE/ΔTI/TI1 =4000/23/300/40ms, voxel size=3.75*3.75*7mm3, 64*64 matrix, 7 slices, 13 timepoints, 84 dynamics, FA:35/11.7o) and one 3D MPRAGE scan (TR/TE = 7.1/3.2ms, FA = 8°, isotropic voxel=0.9mm3, Matrix = 256x256,180 slices). The first QUASAR scan was acquired at baseline, subsequently intravenous ACZ was injected to the participants over a 15min period, followed by 3 further QUASAR scans.
The data were processed using in-house software based on Petersen et al theory [2] modified to account for the presence of an EPI artifact and low signal to noise ratio. A technique was used for partial volume correction based on Asllani et al [3]. Partial volume maps were generated using spatial fuzzy c-means (SFCM) clustering of the high resolution MPRAGE image (fig.1) [4]. CBF was calculated for each scan for GM. CVR was evaluated as the percentage difference between the first and the maximum CBF value of the 3 post-ACZ scans. Total brain volume and GM volume were calculated using the PV maps generated using SFCM clustering. Group mean comparisons for GM and total brain volume were made using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and for CVR using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) to include as a covariate GM volume to assess possible influences of atrophy.
1. Diabetes UK, Diabetes: Facts and Stats, 2015. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/About_us/What-we-say/Statistics/
2. Petersen, E.T., T. Lim, and X. Golay, Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006. 55(2): p. 219-232.
3. Asllani, I., A. Borogovac, and T.R. Brown, Regression algorithm correcting for partial volume effects in arterial spin labeling MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2008. 60(6): p. 1362-71.
4. Chuang, K.S., et al., Fuzzy c-means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2006. 30(1): p. 9-15.
5. Last, D., et al., Global and Regional Effects of Type 2 Diabetes on Brain Tissue Volumes and Cerebral Vasoreactivity. Diabetes Care, 2007. 30 (5): p. 1193-99.
6. Selvarajah, D., et al., A preliminary study of brain macrovascular reactivity in impaired glucose tolerance and type-2 diabetes: Quantitative internal carotid artery blood flow using magnetic resonance phase contrast angiography. Diab Vasc Dis Res, 2016.