Optogenetic fMRI studies have traditionally required significant scan averaging to achieve signal-to-noise ratios sufficient for whole-brain functional network mapping. As a result, more scan time is required, and measurements may not directly translate to accompanying behavioral paradigms that employ a single stimulation. Here, we used a SPION-based MRI contrast agent to enable single-scan functional network mapping with CBV during optogenetic stimulation of the thalamic submedial nucleus. Measurement of CBV led to significant activations detected at the site of stimulation and downstream mono- and polysynaptically connected regions. In comparison, single-scan BOLD measurements led to minimal detectable responses to stimulation.
Two microliters of AAV5-CaMKIIa::ChR2(H134R)-EYFP virus were injected into the submedial thalamic nucleus of adult female Sprague-Dawley rats (16±4 weeks, n=13). In the same surgery, a 62.5 um diameter optical fiber implant was inserted at the virus injection site (-2.63 mm AP, +0.64 mm ML, -6.58 mm DV; Figure 1).
In vivo imaging was conducted at least 7 weeks after surgery to allow for full ChR2 expression. Animals were anesthetized during image acquisition with 1.7% isoflurane, and opaque tape was used to cover the animal’s eyes. fMRI data was acquired in a 7T Bruker BioSpin scanner with a four-shot spiral sequence (TR/TE=750/12 ms, FOV=35x35 mm2, matrix size=70x70). Prior to animal placement in the scanner, 15 mg/kg of the SPION contrast agent Feraheme was administered through the tail vein to visualize the CBV response. Optical stimuli were presented as a block-design paradigm, with six cycles of 20s stimulation trains presented every minute (30% duty cycle, 473 nm light, 2.5 mW). In a subset of subjects, a second series of experiments was conducted to compare single-scan activations between blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) and CBV measurements. Three consecutive scans of BOLD were collected, followed by three more scans measuring the CBV response after Feraheme injection.
Data were analyzed in SPM12 using a fourth-order gamma basis function to identify significant responses (P < 0.05, FWE-corrected). Regions of interest were delineated via a standard rat brain atlas5 to quantify responses.
Figure 2A shows the significant CBV responses to optogenetic stimulation in a representative animal. The strongest signals are observed at the site of stimulation and VLO cortex, a projection site of the targeted nucleus6. This pattern was consistent across all animals tested. Time series from these regions also show that robust signal modulations could be measured from a single scan (Figure 2B). Other regions modulated by stimulation include striatum and motor/somatosensory cortex. Brain-wide quantification across animals emphasizes the large volume of detected activations (Figure 2C).
Figure 3 provides a representative comparison of single-scan BOLD and CBV measurements during the same experiment. Although only a small number of active voxels are detected in the BOLD scan, measurement of CBV results in detectable signal changes across the brain. Quantification of brain-wide activation volume confirms this trend across animals, and highlights that the improvement afforded by CBV extends far beyond the improvement achieved by averaging three scans (Figure 3C).
[1] Weitz, A.J., Fang, Z., Lee, H.J., Fisher, R.S., Smith, W.C., Choy, M.K., Liu, J., Lin, P., Rosenberg, M., and Lee, J.H. (2015). Optogenetic fMRI reveals distinct, frequency-dependent networks recruited by dorsal and intermediate hippocampus stimulations. NeuroImage 107, 229-241.
[2] Lee, H.J., Weitz A.J., Bernal-Casas, D., Duffy, B.A., Choy, M.K., Kravitz, A.V., Kreitzer, A.C., and Lee, J.H. (2016). Activation of direct and indirect pathway medium spiny neurons drives distinct brain-wide responses. Neuron 91 (2), 412-424.
[3] Liu, J., Lee, H.J., Weitz, A.J., Fang, Z., Lin, P., Choy, M.K., Fisher, R., Pinskiy, V., Tolpygo, A., Mitra, P., Schiff, N., and Lee J.H. (2015). Frequency-selective control of cortical and subcortical networks by central thalamus. eLife 4, e09215.
[4] Lee, J.H., Durand, R., Gradinaru, V., Zhang, F., Goshen, I., Kim, D.S., Fenno, L.E., Ramakrishnan, C., and Deisseroth, K. (2010). Global and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined optogenetically by type and wiring. Nature 465, 788-792.
[5] Paxinos G. & Watson C. (2005). The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 5th ed. New York: Academic Press.
[6] Yoshida, A., Dostrovsky, J.O., and Chiang, C.Y. (1992). The afferent and efferent connections of the nucleus submedius in the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 324, 115-133.
[7] Lohani, S., Poplawsky, A.J., Kim, S.G., and Moghaddam B. (2016). Unexpected global impact of VTA dopamine neuron activation as measured by opto-fMRI. Molecular Psychiatry, [advanced online publication].
[8] Aravanis, A.M., Wang, L.P., Zhang, F., Meltzer, L.A., Mogri, M.Z., Schneider, M.B., Deisseroth, K. (2007). An optical neural interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiberoptic and optogenetic technology. Journal of Neural Engineering 4, 143-156.