Disrupted thalamocortical networks and elevated connectivity between thalamic nuclei can reveal the clinical symptoms in mild traumatic brain injury.
This study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and the written informed consent was provided by each participant. Fifteen patients with mTBI and 17 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers were recruited (Table 1). Inclusion criteria for patients were witnessed closed-head trauma, no focal neurologic deficit, and initial Glasgow Coma Scale higher than 13. Neuropsychological assessments were performed by a clinical psychologist to evaluate clinical symptoms. MRI data, including a 3D T1-MPRAGE (TR/TE: 2300/3.26 ms; voxel size: 1.0x1.0x1.0 mm3) and BOLD fMRI (TR/TE: 2000/20 ms; voxel size: 2.2x2.2x3.5 mm3) with 3 separated runs for resting-state, 1-back, and 2-back experiment were acquired using a 20-channel head coil on a 3T MR scanner (Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma). During n-back tasks, participants were told to respond whenever the current stimulus matched the number that had been presented n back previously (n = 1 or 2)6. An n-back session contained 3 epochs, with each composed of a 30-second task period and a 30-second fixing on a crosshair. Patients received MR scan within 2 weeks after mTBI.
The fMRI data were preprocessed using SPM8 with the standard procedures: corrected for slice timing, realigned, spatially normalized into the standard space, and spatially smoothed with a 6-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel7. The cortical regions were parcellated based on Brodmann atlas, and the thalamic nuclei were identified based on Talairach atlas (Table 2)8. The regional BOLD signal was then extracted by averaging voxel signals within the region, and regressing out the confounding effects of motion parameters and signals from the white matter and cerebrospinal fluid. The thalamocrotical connectivity was estimated by calculating the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between regional BOLD signals (between 0.01 and 0.10 Hz) followed by Fisher’s r-to-z transform. One-sample t-test was employed to determine the significance of functional connectivity within group (p<0.05, with FDR correction), and two-sample t-test was used to determine the differences between groups (p<0.01). Partial correlation coefficients with controlling age and gender effects were computed to reveal the relations between functional connectivity and neuropsychological scores.
1. Bigler ED, Maxwell WL. Neuropathology of mild traumatic brain injury: relationship to neuroimaging findings. Brain imaging and behavior. 2012;6(2):108-36.
2. Huang YL, Kuo YS, Tseng YC, Chen DY, Chiu WT, Chen CJ. Susceptibility-weighted MRI in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2015;84(6):580-5.
3. Inglese M, Makani S, Johnson G, Cohen BA, Silver JA, Gonen O, Grossman RI. Diffuse axonal injury in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Journal of neurosurgery. 2005;103(2):298-303.
4. Chen CJ, Wu CH, Liao YP, Hsu HL, Tseng YC, Liu HL, Chiu WT. Working memory in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: functional MR imaging analysis. Radiology. 2012;264(3):844-51.
5. Llinás R, Ribary U, Jeanmonod D, Cancro R, Kronberg E, Schulman J, Zonenshayn M, Magnin M, Morel A, Siegmund M. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia I. Functional and imaging aspects. Thalamus & Related Systems. 2001;1(03):237-44.
6. Owen AM, McMillan KM, Laird AR, Bullmore E. N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human brain mapping. 2005;25(1):46-59.
7. Penny WD, Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, Nichols TE, editors. Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images. Academic press; 2011 Apr 28.
8. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L, Kochunov PV, Nickerson D, Mikiten SA, Fox PT. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Human brain mapping. 2000 Jul 1;10(3):120-31.
9. Spreng RN, Mar RA, Kim AS. The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2009;21(3):489-510.
10. Owen AM, McMillan KM, Laird AR, Bullmore E. N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human brain mapping. 2005;25(1):46-59.