Simone Angela Winkler1, Anne Muehe1, Ashok Theruvath1, Maryam Aghighi1, Sandra Luna-Fineman1, Neyssa Marina1, Ranjana Advani1, Valentina Taviani2, Samantha J Holdsworth1, Praveen Gulaka1, and Heike Daldrup-Link1
1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2GE Healthcare
Synopsis
We present a fast sequence with high
diagnostic accuracy to move towards high-throughput clinical whole-body cancer
staging using PET/MRI. Ferumoxytol-contrast enhanced T1-weighted LAVA-Flex is
acquired at 16s/bed, at a voxel size of 3.4x1.5x1.9mm. This contrast-enhanced
sequence offers superior vessel contrast and resolution to existing T1 co-registration
modalities that are most commonly based on MR attenuation correction sequences
or longer T1-weighted sequences. Integration of this sequence in a clinical
protocol bears the promise of dramatically accelerated whole-body cancer
staging with durations <20min, thus offering similar exam times to the more
radiation-invasive alternative of PET/CT.
Introduction
PET/MRI
offers simultaneous multimodal imaging acquisition with reduced radiation
exposure compared to PET/CT, which is specifically significant to pediatric
imaging. However, long MR acquisition times and high cost still hinder acceptance
among clinicians. Fast acquisition of whole-body MR protocols of <20min with
reliable oncological diagnostic detectability is therefore pivotal for the success
of PET/MRI as a high-throughput cancer staging modality1,2. Routinely,
Dixon T1 sequences also serving for MR attenuation correction (MRAC) are used
as a fast (<20s/bed) anatomical co-registration modality but typically suffer from low
resolution. Alternate protocols use T1 fast spin echo (FSE) and half
Fourier-acquisition turbo spin-echo (HASTE), requiring 45-60s/bed1. Current
T2 sequences mostly require longer scan times of 1-3min/bed. Here, we present a fast breath-hold sequence for
co-registration with 18F-FDG PET data as an alternative to
conventional PET/CT: a ferumoxytol-enhanced 3D FSPGR T1-weighted Dixon
(LAVA-Flex) sequence, acquired at 16s/bed position, which enables co-registered
images with excellent T1 contrast and tumor
delineationMethods
A PET/MR scanner (Signa,
GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) was used with a body coil in a whole-body
acquisition to test the performance of the proposed protocol. Ferumoxytol-enhanced
images were acquired in ten patients using the following sequences: high
resolution LAVA-Flex (voxel size = 3.4x1.5x1.9mm and TE/TR/FA=1.7/2.3/15; as well as the
more conventionally used low-resolution LAVA-Flex (MRAC) sequence (voxel size =
4.1x2.6mm). The SNR of the two sequences were compared with a statistical t-test.
We also compared the spatial resolution
and acquisition times of these approaches with other co-registration techniques
selected from the literature, including STIR and FSE1,2.Results
PET/MR
images acquired on a patient with Ewing Sarcoma are shown in an anatomical
overlay for both the MRAC (Fig. 1a,c) and high-resolution LAVA-Flex sequences
(Fig. 1b,d). Table 1 compares relevant image parameters of our proposed
sequences to a select set of protocols in the literature.
Scan time reduction: T1 LAVA-Flex can be
acquired within 16s, i.e. in a similar duration as the MRAC (18s) and significantly
faster than conventional T1 sequences, including FSE (52s)1.
Increased in-plane anatomical resolution:
High-resolution LAVA-Flex images are
acquired at an in-plane resolution of 1.5x1.9mm, yielding a large improvement in
image quality and diagnostic value over MRAC (4.1x2.6mm). Voxel sizes for
other, longer sequences are variable and are shown in Table 1 for comparison.
Increased SNR: The SNR between tumor and
background signal in a population of 10 patients aged 15 to 23 years with sarcoma
were compared between the high-resolution LAVA-Flex and the MRAC
sequence and rated with a t-test. The mean SNR was statistically significantly
higher for the high-resolution LAVA-Flex sequence (mean SNR = 189.6 ± 20.5) as compared to the
MRAC sequence (mean SNR = 108.8 ±
22.7) (p < 0.005).
Discussion
Our
proposed protocol can significantly accelerate the total exam time for PET/MR
studies. A 2min PET acquisition per bed position easily encompasses both T1 high-resolution
LAVA-Flex and MRAC sequences, resulting in an overall scan time of <20min with
5-7 bed positions. This reduction in whole-body scan time provides an important
opportunity for tailored PET/MR tumor staging – and is particularly promising for
pediatric patients to ensure high image quality1,
time and cost efficiency2-4,7,8,
and to minimize sedation times5. Previous PET/MR studies in
pediatric patients evaluated the head to midthighs in 60 and 45min, respectively,
using T2-weighted sequences2,6,8.
Using ferumoxytol as a contrast agent, we covered the same area in <20min,
with better vessel delineation, and anatomical information more comparable to
PET/CT.
In addition, the shortened whole-body acquisition time allows for additional dedicated
sequences – in particular unenhanced STIR and LAVA. We are currently
striving to optimize all other sequences (including T2-weighted FSE and DWI) in an
effort to reduce the overall scan time/bed.Conclusions
We
presented a fast T1-weighted (LAVA-Flex) sequence for accelerated whole body 18F-FDG-PET
cancer staging with whole-body acquisition times of <20 minutes. We
anticipate an accelerated push for the PET/MRI modality towards clinical
acceptance as a low-radiation alternative to PET/CT with the added flexibility
of MRI as a largely versatile diagnostic tool.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a
grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development, grant number R01 HD081123-01A1.References
[1]
Ishii S, et al., Jpn J Radiol (2016). doi:10.1007/s11604-016-0584-9; [2]
Martinez-Moeller et al., J Nucl Med 53(9):1415-26 (2012); [3]
Ruangwattanapaisarn et al., J Magn Reson Imaging. 42(6):1747-68 (2015). [4]
Ciet P, et al., Pediatr Radiol 45:1901-15 (2015). [5] Hirsch FW et al., Pediatr
Radiol 43:860-75 (2013). [6] von Schulthess GK et al., J Nucl Med 55:19S-24S
(2014). [7] Martinez-Moeller A et al., J Nucl Med 53:1415-26 (2012). [8] Aghighi M et al., Eur Radiol (2016).