Tatsuya J Arai1, Donghan M Yang1, James Campbell 1, and Ralph P Mason1
1Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
The present work
seeks to explore the accuracy and precision of proton MR oximetry imaging
(MOXI) in silico. MOXI technique relies
on the separation of oxygen sensitive T2Blood from the
bi-exponential nature of overall T2 decay. The bi-exponential T2
decay models with Rician distribution noise were numerically generated, simulating
the preclinical prostate tumor model experiments. The present in silico study showed the feasibility
of the proton based MOXI technique. However, the results suggest that the MOXI
technique may lack the accuracy and precision of measuring short T2Blood
(< 30 ms), which is essential to measure hypoxia in a tumor.
Purpose
A non-invasive approach to quantitative tumor
oximetry was recently presented by Zhang et
al.[1] and the current study seeks to explore the accuracy and precision
of proton MR oximetry imaging (MOXI) in
silico. Zhang et al. demonstrated
that T2 decay contains two components: blood and non-blood. The
ratio of the two signal intensity components is proportional to perfusion fraction
(Fp). The multi-parametric MRI technique enables separation of T2Blood
from the bi-exponential decay model. Thus, the local hemoglobin saturation
level (SpO2) may be estimated from T2Blood. In this study, bi-exponential
T2 decay models with realistic Rician distribution noise were numerically
generated, approximating the experimentally obtained apparent T2 (i.e., mono-exponential T2 decay
combining both blood and non-blood components) and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR)
using Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence in subcutaneously implanted Dunning-R3327-AT1 prostate tumors and adjacent limb muscles in rats. Accuracy and
precision of the MOXI method were evaluated by comparing the ground truth T2Blood with estimated “T2Blood”. Methods
(1) MRI data were
collected at 4.7-T. T2 decays in both tumor and muscle regions were
measured using a CPMG sequence (TR = 2000 ms, τcp = 10 ms, TE = n × τcp (1 ≤ n
≤ 12), matrix 128 × 64, slice thickness of 2 mm, and field of view of 40 mm ×
40 mm). A single slice encompassing the largest cross-section area of tumor was
selected (Figure 1). (2) The bi-exponential based T2Blood
measurement was tested in silico.
A Rician noise was added to bi-exponential
model to simulate T2 signal decays with various levels of SNR, Fp,
and blood and non-blood components of T2. The models were classified
into two groups (tumor and muscle) based on their apparent T2. In
the first analysis, true T2nonBlood, S0 (initial
transverse magnetization at TE = 0 ms) and Fp were used to extract T2Blood
from the model based on an implicit assumption that three input values were
known in advance. The non-blood component of T2 decay was subtracted
from the overall bi-exponential model and T2Blood was computed from
the remainder. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to investigate the
impact of slight deviations in T2nonBlood and S0 from
their true values on T2Blood estimation. In this analysis, Fp and T2Blood were 0.21 and 20 ms, respectively and two SNR conditions (i.e. with and without Rician noise) were
tested. Results
The experimental
data showed apparent T2 in tumor and muscle were 79.0 ± 5.6 ms and
32.6 ± 1.2 ms, respectively (mean ± s.d. over six animals). A ratio of S0 to an MRI signal
intensity where no object was present (µRayleigh) was used as the
metric of SNR. S0/µRayleigh in tumor was 79.9 ± 12.9,
while that in muscle was 84.8 ± 18.1. Based on the results, bi-exponential
models with Rician noise were generated with the combinations of two apparent T2
conditions (Tumor: 70-90 ms and Muscle 25-45 ms), two SNR conditions (zero
noise and S0/µRayleigh of 56-112), and three perfusion fractions (0.09, 0.21, and 0.30). Without noise, the bi-exponential model
always attained the true T2Blood (Figure 2). With added noise, the
precision of T2Blood measurement worsened (represented by the
error-bars in Figure 3). The greater Fp corresponded to the better precision of
T2Blood. The estimated T2Blood deviated from its true
value in the low T2Blood region (< 30 ms). The results of
sensitivity analysis are presented in Figure 4. The color-scale corresponds to
sum-of-squared-residuals, where the local minima correspond to the optimal set
of T2Blood, T2nonBlood and S0. The local
minimum was not found on the set of true input values when the noise was
presented (Figure 4B).Discussion
Accuracy and precision of T2Blood
estimation largely depended on SNR. Although T2Blood was still
accurately computed in the high T2Blood region of tumor, the low T2Blood
(< 30 ms) was not accurately estimated even with a-priori information. T2Blood of 30 ms accounts for SpO2
of 0.5 according to both Luz-Meiboom and a weak-field diffusion Jensen-Chandra models[2] estimated at 4.7-T. The sensitivity analysis suggested that the local minimum
was not found on the set of true input values when the noise was
presented. Hence, T2Blood is likely subject to substantial uncertainty
with the realistic level of SNR. It is crucial to improve the accuracy and
precision of T2Blood estimation especially in short T2Blood
region which is associated with tumor hypoxia. Conclusion
The present in silico study confirmed the
feasibility of the proton based MOXI technique. However, the results suggest
that the MOXI technique may lack the accuracy and precision of measuring short T2Blood, which is essential to monitor tumor hypoxia. Acknowledgements
Grants
CPRIT: RP140285
NIH: P30 CA142543;
EB015908; S10 RR028011References
[1] : Zhang et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 71:561–569 (2014)
[2] : Gardener et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 64:967–974 (2010)