Veerle Kersemans1, John S Beech1, Stuart Gilchrist1, Paul Kinchesh1, Philip D Allen1, James Thompson1, Ana L Gomes1, Zenobia D'Costa1, Luke Bird1, Iain DC Tullis1, Robert G Newman1, Abul Azad1, Ruth J Muschel1, Borivoj Vojnovic1, Mark A Hill1, Emmanouil Fokas1, and Sean C Smart1
1CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
The aim was to develop and validate a robust and accurate method of MR-IGRT
delivery to abdominal targets in the mouse that takes advantage of the
strengths of each of its components: MRI for soft tissue contrast and target
identification, CBCT for accurate dose calculation and IGRT for accurate,
collimated X-ray beam delivery. A multimodality cradle was developed and
evaluated to enable transfer of the mouse between MR and the IGRT platform. Additionally,
each step of the MG-IGRT process was validated, both in vitro using BANG gel
dosimeters and in vivo by targeting the adrenal glands in mice.
Purpose
CT-guided radiotherapy (RT) platforms are commercially
available but the images show poor soft tissue contrast, hindering applications
in the body. Invasive workarounds have been proposed1 but these do
not provide a general solution to the problem.
We validate the use of apparatus and a workflow2 that
provides a general solution for enabling MRI to be used in RT planning with
application in the mouse body as previously described3.Methods
MRI was performed at 7T (Varian) using appropriately
sized quadrature birdcage RF coils (Rapid Biomedical). MR-guided RT (MR-IGRT)
was performed on the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (XStrahl). A custom
made cradle was developed to enable transfer of the mouse between MR and the
IGRT platform without introduction of large-scale body deformations.
Rotationally asymmetric BANG gel dosimeters (n=5) were
irradiated with 2 intersecting, orthogonally-applied 2-4mm wide rectangular x-ray
beams in order to present an MR-visible but CT-invisible target. This gel was
imaged by MRI using a CE-FAST scan at 273µm isotropic resolution. The gel was transferred
to the IGRT system and a CT image was produced at 160µm resolution. The MR and
CT images were registered using a finite iterative closest point algorithm. Next,
a conical arc beam was applied with its centre-of-rotation at the
manually-defined centre of the beam-intersection as defined by the registered
MR-CT image. MRI was repeated to allow assessment of the MR-IGRT beam delivery
and the offset between the target and the delivered beam was used to measure targeting
accuracy.
Long term movements of mice were assessed by repeated
MRI of the same mouse when held in a non-moving cradle (to define the intrinsic
body motions), and also by repeated imaging of the same mouse as it was
transferred between the MR and CT systems (to define the extrinsic motions
induced through movement of the cradle and mouse). A respiration-gated,
constant TR, bSSFP scan (TE 1.134ms, TR 3.268ms, FA 15˚, 16μs hard pulse, resolution
400µm isotropic, 0˚/180˚ RF phase alternation) was used.
Confirmation of accuracy of beam delivery was assessed in vivo in 4
mice, by targeting one adrenal gland with a single RT beam. The same bSSFP scan
was used, the animal was transferred to the IGRT system and a CT image was
produced with a total procedure time of below 30 minutes per mouse. MR-to-CT
registration was performed using the deformable MIND registration technique4,
the adrenal was identified on the MR-CT image, and the RT beam (10Gy) was
delivered using adrenal-size-matched collimators. Animals were killed at 30
minutes post irradiation and the adrenals and adjacent kidneys were prepared
for γH2AX and DAPI staining to assess the DNA damage induced by the x-ray beam.Results and Discussion
The MR image of a BANG gel featuring the intersecting
beam for targeting is shown in Fig1A, and the same gel, following MR-IGRT is
shown in Fig1B. A mean offset between
target- and result-centres of 0.56±0.18mm (n=5) was measured. The intrinsic
body motions were dominated by peristalsis and body droop, the latter having a
maximum excursion of approximately 0.5mm over 30 minutes. The extrinsic motions,
measured after 5 transfers between the MR and RT systems, were measured to be
ca. 0.5mm, approximately the same as the underlying error demonstrated by the
BANG gel targeting and intrinsic motion tests.
bSSFP MR allowed for fast imaging of the mouse abdomen
(<10 minutes from anaesthesia induction to transfer to RT) and the adrenals
could be easily localised on MR (Fig2A), but not on CT (Fig2B). The registered MR-CT
image (Fig2C) was successfully used to guide RT delivery of 10Gy to one of the
adrenals (Fig2D) as confirmed by γH2AX staining (Fig3). In the irradiated adrenals (Fig3AB)
the DNA damage was abundant and homogenously
distributed while background levels of DNA damage were seen in the kidney proximal
to the collimated irradiation (Fig3C) or in the non-irradiated adrenal (Fig3D).
Any failure in any part of the MR-IGRT procedure would have resulted in an
absent or partial distribution of the γH2AX foci in the MR-IGRT targeted
adrenal glands. The entire Mr-IGRT procedure was fast, <30 minutes per
mouse, and through the use of 2 cradles 2 mice could be run simultaneously, one
in the MR system, one in the IGRT system, to give an effective turnaround time
of <15 minutes per mouse.Conclusions
The proposed MR-IGRT method presents a general
solution to enabling robust, accurate and efficient targeting of organs and, by
inference tumours, in the mouse and can operate with a sufficiently high
throughput to allow fractionated treatments to be given routinely.Acknowledgements
The
work presented was supported financially by Cancer Research UK (CRUK grants
C5255/A12678, C2522/A10339), the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research
Council (EPSRC grant C2522/A10339) and the Medical Research Council Unit Grant
for the Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology. The authors
also acknowledge expert technical assistance from the Institute Mechanical and
Electronics Workshops, animal facilities team and anyone else who contributed financially
or in kind.References
1.
Thorek DL,
Kramer RM, Chen Q, Jeong J, Lupu ME, Lee AM, et al. Reverse-Contrast Imaging
and Targeted Radiation Therapy of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Models. Int J
Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(2):444-53.
2.
J. Beech, D.
Allen, J. Thompson, S. Gilchrist, P. Kinchesh, R. et al. MR-guided radiotherapy
planning in the mouse abdomen Magn Reson Mater Phy (2015) 28 (S1): S336.
3.
Corroyer-Dulmont
A, Falzone N, Kersemans V, Thompson J, Hill M, Allen PD, et al. MRI-Guided
Radiotherapy of the SK-N-SH Neuroblastoma Xenograft Model Using a Small Animal
Radiation Research Platform. Br J Radiol. 2016:20160427.
4.
Heinrich MP,
Jenkinson M, Bhushan M, Matin T, Gleeson FV, Brady SM, et al. MIND: modality
independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration.
Med Image Anal. 2012;16(7):1423-35.