Mohammad Mohseni1, John Connell1, Stephen Patrick1, May Zaw-Thin1, Tammy Kalber1, Tom Roberts1, Quentin Pankhurst2, Mark Lythgoe1, and Bernard Siow1
1CABI, UCL, london, United Kingdom, 2UCL, london, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Magnetic targeting of drug-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles has the potential to increase the concentration of therapeutic agents to tumours whilst reducing off-target side effects of current chemotherapy methods. This preclinical work demonstrates that SPION accumulation can be increased in subcutaneous tumours using magnetic fields and can then be detected by MRI. In addition, key physiological parameters can be measured before magnetic targeting for future optimisation of the strategy.
Introduction
One of the
current challenges in clinical chemotherapy is delivering a high concentration
of drug to the tumour tissue whilst reducing systemic dosing and limiting
off-target side effects. Magnetic nanoparticles, in combination with applied
magnetic fields, can non-invasively guide small molecule drugs1,
antibodies and cells2 to a specific site within the body to enhance their
drug delivery efficacy. Importantly, magnetic nanoparticles also act as a MRI
contrast agent, enabling non-invasive imaging of particle delivery to the
region of interest. Currently, limited work has been carried out targeting
nanoparticles to tumours after intravenous administration, or how physiological
parameters, such as blood perfusion and vessel permeability effects. In this
study we combine imaging with magnetic targeting to assess delivery of magnetic
nanoparticles as a therapeutic approach to cancer therapy.Methods
In this proof of principle study, 1.5 million SW1222T human colorectal
tumour cells were subcutaneously injected into nude CD-1 mice (n=6) on each
flank. After a period of 14 days, super-paramagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles,
Fluid Mag-CT particles (Chemicell, 100nm diameter with a magnetite core with
carboxyl functional group) were intravenously injected into the mouse and a 1T
neodymium magnet was positioned over the surface of one of the bilateral
tumours for 20 minutes. T2-weighted and T2* map MR images were acquired before
and after particle administration using respiratory-triggered fast spin echo
and multiple gradient echo sequences respectively. In addition, dynamic
contrast enhanced MR images (DCE, 2D gradient echo sequence with 1 second
temporal resolution) and perfusion maps (flow sensitive alternating inversion
recovery with gradient echo with Look-Locker readout3 were acquired
to assess blood vessel permeability and tumour perfusion using a 9.4T MRI
scanner (Agilent Technologies Inc,
USA). Data were analysed with in-house MATLAB code.Results
We observed notable hypointensities in all tumors with magnetic
targeting due to the accumulation of iron oxide nanoparticles. As expected,
these regions tended to be more prevalent when close to the magnet. Prussian
blue staining on histology confirmed this. We also observed a reduction in T2*
of magnetic targeting (p<0.05 t-test;n=6) compared with control (no
magnet) tumour (Fig1). Quantitative perfusion mapping of subcutaneous tumours demonstrated
a low and heterogeneous perfusion (0.8 +/- 1.8 ml/g/min), and gadolinium
enhanced-DCE indicated a slow wash in rate (0.175 s-1) as opposed to the
higher wash in rate of muscle tissue (6.57 s-1). Discussion
The results presented here show that relatively small (100nm) SPIONs
accumulate in subcutaneous tumours when exposed to a magnetic field (Figure 1).
This indicates that nanoparticles can be selectively steered out of vascular
bed into the tumour to provide a mechanism to deliver a therapeutic payload. In
the future, quantitative MRI methods for perfusion mapping and
gadolinium-enhanced MRI will be used to evaluate physiological parameters,
perfusion and blood vessel permeability, to tailor the magnetic targeting to
the tumour.Conclusion
Static magnetic fields can increase SPION localisation in tumours. These
data support the use of targeted magnetic nanoparticles using the gradient
field of MRI scanner in a technique called Magnetic Resonance Targeting (MRT)4.
In addition, gadolinium-enhanced MRI may be used to predict and optimise the
MRT parameters.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
(1) Vicky V. Mody Arthur Cox Samit Shah et al., Magnetic nanoparticle drug
delivery systems for targeting tumor, Applied Nanoscience, 2014; 385–392
(2) Riegler J, Lau KD, Garcia-Prieto et al., Magnetic cell
delivery for peripheral arterial disease: A theoretical framework, Med Phys, 2011; 38, 3932
(3) Ramasawmy, R., Campbell-Washburn, A.E., Wells, J.A et al., Hepatic
arterial spin labelling MRI: an initial evaluation in mice, NMR Biomed . 2015; 28(2):272-280
(4) Munitta Muthana, Aneurin J.
Kennerley, Russell Hughes et al., Directing cell therapy to anatomic target sites in vivo with
magnetic resonance targeting, Nature Comms. 2015;
10.1038