Adam Maunder1, Graham Norquay1, Madhwesha Rao1, and Jim M Wild1
1Unit of Academic Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Monitoring of the 129Xe
polarization by NMR during spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP) is vital for
quality control and for experimental investigations into optimizing system
running parameters. In this study, we present a compact NMR spectrometer designed to improve
user flexibility and reduce cost for online polarimetry on a 129Xe
SEOP system. A Java-based user interface was developed to control the system
with an Arduino based hardware control. The performances of the user interface
and hardware in routine 129Xe NMR spectrometer measurements are
demonstrated herein.
Background
Monitoring
the polarization
level of 129Xe in a spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP) polarizer imposes
engineering challenges for portability, compactness and cost. To date, many systems
have been developed for this purpose, but have either lacked an integrated
computer interface1-3 or relied upon
expensive proprietary hardware and software for analogue to digital conversion4-5. Purpose
Development of a NMR
spectrometer for low-field
(~2.5
mT) NMR of 129Xe that
integrates open source hardware (Arduino) and software (Java) to minimize cost while maximizing user flexibility.Methods
The spectrometer in Figure 1(a) is a two-part construction, consisting of an
Arduino-based digital component and custom-designed analogue component.
Functionally, the spectrometer is composed of the modules in Figure 1(b). Firstly, a transmit module with class B
LM675 amplifier; and secondly, a receiver module made of four stage amplification,
filters and 12 bit ADC @ 125 kHz sampling rate. Data is transferred by serial
communication between the Arduino processor and the computer. As seen in Figure 1(a), analogue circuits are mounted on a separate
custom board, which is fitted to the Arduino board (only partly visible in Figure 1(a)). The Arduino generates the transmission signal (129Xe
Larmor frequency @ 2.5 mT B0 field 29.4 kHz). The Java user
interface is shown in Figure 2, which includes control of transmit and receive
voltage gain and NMR sampling parameters such as acquisition time and spectral resolution. The transmit
and receive gains are regulated by digital potentiometers; maximum receiver
chain gain is 10 000 V/V (80dB) and actively bandpass filtered for maximum gain
at 30 KHz. NMR parameters
include: input voltage, analogue gain, pulse length, Q-switch length, number of
acquisitions, sampling points and excitation frequency. A Q-damping circuit4 was employed to reduce coil ringing and was switched on for 50-200
µs after the pulse. The JAVA GUI communicates with the microcontroller at 328, 125 bits/s.
FIDs or processed FIDs can be saved as text files for signal analysis. Results are displayed in real time and can be analysed
with user-varied parameters: mixing frequency, low pass filter frequency cutoff, start point for analysis, and phase of mixing frequency. Measurements presented here utilized a 150 turn,
2.2 cm diameter (measured 480 µH inductance and 2.1 Ω resistance) coil tuned
with a parallel capacitor. For 129Xe polarization measurements, the
coil was placed on the surface of the SEOP cell. Pulse width was optimized for maximum
signal, and from the beginning of the polarization process, the spectral
magnitude at the 129Xe Larmor frequency was measured every 30
seconds to determine the Rb-129Xe spin-up time constant. Results
The coil ring-down
with application of the Q-switch for short (10 µs) or long (100 µs) time periods
are shown in Figure 3. By fitting the coil ring-down, the coil Q was measured
as 23.3. A 90 µs longer application of the Q-switch reduced the amplitude of
ringing by a factor of 6.5, allowing for more rapid acquisition post-excitation.
Measured NMR spectra of 129Xe are shown in Figure 4 for varying transmit RF pulse width, where it was
found a pulse width of 0.5 ms resulted in the highest signal (FA ~ 90º).
Signal-to-noise (SNR) was shown to be high by comparison to noise-only acquisitions made with
the static B0 field switched off. After phasing of the NMR data, the
129Xe
in the SEOP cell was measured at 37 ms from the
full-width-half-max of the absorption spectrum. In Figure 5, the monitoring of 129Xe
polarization increase after the beginning the SEOP process is demonstrated
showing that steady state 129Xe polarization is obtained after ~ 420
s in this SEOP cell.Discussion and Conclusion
An NMR spectrometer with
a user-friendly interface is demonstrated, providing high SNR that can be used
to calculate the nuclear polarization of 129Xe on a SEOP polarizer. Through
using inexpensive, off-the-shelf components and custom-written open source
(Java) software, a large degree of flexibility the potential for customization
is offered by the NMR system. Whilst employed here for in situ polarization
monitoring, the system could readily be adapted for off-bench polarimetry, and
is directly applicable to other HP nuclei such as 13C and 3He.
Future implementations of the system may include parallel multiple transceive
coils, optional measurement with the directly sampled or hardware mixed signal to
open up the possibility of measurements at higher field strengths and
transmit/receive switching utilizing FET switches rather than crossed diode
pairs. Direct relation of
the FID amplitude to 129Xe polarization level in the SEOP cell will involve
comparison with an independently calibrated measurement of polarization.Acknowledgements
Doctoral program funding for Adam Maunder was
partially provided by support from GE Healthcare Inc. and scholarships from the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and
University of Sheffield. This work was funded by the National Institute for
health research (NIHR), Medical Research Council (MRC) and University of
Sheffield Hyperpolarised Imaging Group - POLARIS. The views expressed in this
abstract are those of the author and not necessarily those of NHS, NIHR, MRC or
the Department of Health.References
1. G. P. Wong, C. H.
Tseng, V. R. Pomeroy, R. W. Mair, D. P. Hinton, D. Hoffmann, et al., "A system for low field imaging of laser-polarized
noble gas," Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 1999;141:217-227
2. C. H. Tseng, G. P.
Wong, V. R. Pomeroy, R. W. Mair, D. P. Hinton, D. Hoffmann, et al., "Low-field MRI of laser polarized noble gas," Phys Rev Lett, 1998;81:3785-3788
3. B. T. Saam and M.
S. Conradi, "Low Frequency NMR Polarimeter for Hyperpolarized Gases,"
Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 1998;134:67-71
4. S. E. Korchak, W.
Kilian, and L. Mitschang, "Configuration and Performance of a Mobile 129Xe Polarizer," Applied Magnetic
Resonance, 2013;44:65-80
5. R. P. Steven, B. W.
Elliot, B. Stephen, and D. F. Christopher, "Digital pulsed NMR
spectrometer for nuclear spin-polarized 3He and other hyperpolarized
gases," Measurement Science and
Technology, 2008;19:045601