Ali Aghaeifar1,2, Irena Zivkovic1, Christian Mirkes1, Theodor Steffen1, and Klaus Scheffler1,3
1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, 2IMPRS for Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 3Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Synopsis
The homogenization of static magnetic field (B0) is necessary for MR imaging. The unwanted B0 inhomogeneity becomes more pronounced in ultra high field, and the scanner's inbuilt shim setup can not compensate the B0 fluctuation as is needed. Here we propose to use combined setup of the multi-coil approach and the scanner's shim setup to achieve higher homogeneity of B0 field. We employed custom-built multi-coil for slice-wise shimming in combination with the scanner's shim setup for global shimming. The results show improvement about 50% compare to dynamic shimming alone in the most of the slices.
Introduction
The homogeneity of the main
static magnetic field (B0) is a crucial
prerequisite for MR imaging due to the manifold image artifacts that can arise
from field perturbations. The initially homogeneous B0 field inside the empty
magnet bore is distorted by the insertion of a human subject. This B0
inhomogeneity becomes more pronounced with increasing field strength and can
lead to severe image distortions 1. Usually, the scanner’s inbuilt
shim system, which creates spherical harmonic (SH) field terms, is used for
global static shimming. Recently, smaller
local coils were proposed in the literature to achieve a higher shim
performance 2. However, it remains
difficult to shim large volumes efficiently. Slice-wise dynamic shimming can
mitigate this problem as field distortions in a much smaller sub-volume have to
be compensated 3. Here we propose to combine
global shimming with the scanner’s SH shim system and dynamic shimming with a custom-made
multi-coil setup to achieve a superior homogeneity of the B0 field.Method
A
multi-coil shim setup was constructed consisting of 16 circular coils,
which were arranged in two rows. Each coil had 25 wire turns and a diameter of
100 mm. The coils were mounted on a fiber-glass cylinder having a diameter of 370
mm and a length of 310 mm. The prototype of this multi-coil setup is
illustrated in figure 1. A
custom-built amplifier was used to drive
the 16 coils individually. The setting for proportional–integral–derivative
(PID) controller of the amplifier could
be adjusted for each individual coil in order to get the best performance for
rapid switching with the least overshoot in the output current. The voltage
induced by gradient switching limited the maximum number of wire turns for the
B0 coils. The maximum output of the amplifier was limited to 2 A per channel to
prevent excessive heating of the shim setup. Communication with the amplifier
was conducted with an analog signal
generated by a 16-bit digital-to-analog converter (DAC). A
custom-built LABVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX) program was responsible for driving the DAC.
To evaluate the performance of the amplifier and the multi-coil setup, we used a double-echo gradient
echo sequence to create B0 maps before and after shimming a large cylindrical
phantom filled with silicon oil. The MR sequence was modified to be able
to send the next slice number to be measured to LABVIEW via a standard UDP
protocol. In this way, the slices could be excited and measured in any
arbitrary order. We employed a two-channel
antenna as RF transceiver to get larger FOV, and the measuring protocol for the
gradient sequence was as following: TE1/TE2/TR: 2.04/3.84/20 ms, Slices: 25, FOV:
300x300x90 mm3. The measurement was repeated five times: 1- without
any shimming to get the initial B0 map, 2- after global shimming with the scanner’s
SH shim system on the data acquired in 1, 3-
after global shimming with the multi-coil
setup on the data acquired in 1, 4- after dynamic shimming with the multi-coil setup on the data acquired in 1 and 5-
after global shimming with the scanner’s SH shim system after which the
multi-coil dynamic shimming was performed.
The required amperage for each individual
coil and slice was calculated using the fmincon
function in MATLAB. More precisely, a linear combination of the fields
generated by the B0 coils was determined
that approximated best the acquired B0 map before shimming.Results
Figure 2 shows a comparison of the B0
field distribution for three slices from the aforementioned measurements. The
standard deviation of B0 field is stated for each slice and measurement as
well.
The outer slices exhibited the
highest improvement. The calculated currents did not exceed 1 A for any slice,
even though an upper bound of 2 A was set in the optimization.Discussion & Conclusion
In this study, different shimming
strategies were compared. For removing the smooth variations in B0 field, the scanner’s
SH shim system works nice, while for the local stronger inhomogeneity,
multi-coil approach can perform better. To date, no shimming method exists that compensates B0 inhomogeneity
perfectly for all situations, therefore the combined method can bring strengths
together. According to the results,
the combination of dynamic and static SH shimming improves B0 homogeneity by
about 50% compared to dynamic shimming alone in the most of the slices. Similar
results are expected in the case of in-vivo measurements.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. S. Sengupta et al., “Dynamic B0
shimming at 7 T,” Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 483–496,
2011.
2. C. Juchem, T.
W. Nixon, S. McIntyre, D. L. Rothman, and R. A. De Graaf, “Magnetic field
modeling with a set of individual localized coils,” J. Magn. Reson.,
vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 281–289, 2010.
3. K. M. Koch, S.
McIntyre, T. W. Nixon, D. L. Rothman, and R. A. de Graaf, “Dynamic shim
updating on the human brain,” J. Magn. Reson., vol. 180, no. 2, pp.
286–296, 2006.