Nikolai I. Avdievich1, Ioannis A. Giapitzakis1, and Anke Henning1,2
1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, 2Institute of Physics, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany
Synopsis
Tight-fit ultra-high field (UHF) (>7T) surface
loop transceiver (TxRx)-phased arrays improve transmit (Tx) efficiency in
comparison to Tx-only arrays built larger to accommodate for receive (Rx)-only
array inserts. However, the number of elements in TxRx-arrays is restricted by
the number of available RF Tx-channels (commonly 8 or 16), which limits
the Rx-performance. A prototype of a 16-element array, which consists of 8
TxRx-surface loops circumscribing a head and 8 additional “vertical” Rx-only loops
positioned in the center of each TxRx-loop perpendicularly, was constructed. This
addition improves the Rx-performance substantially and has a minimal effect on
both the Tx-efficiency and maximal local SAR.
Introduction:
Tight-fit human head
ultra-high field (UHF, 7T and above) transceiver (TxRx) surface loop phased
arrays (1,2) improve transmit (Tx) efficiency in comparison to Tx-only arrays,
which are usually larger to fit multi-channel receive (Rx)-only arrays inside (3).
A drawback of the TxRx-design is that the number of array elements is restricted
by the number of available radiofrequency (RF) Tx-channels (commonly 8 or 16).
This channel count is not sufficient for an optimal SNR and parallel Rx-performance.
In this work we developed a method
of increasing the number of Rx-elements in a TxRx-array without the necessity
of moving the Tx-elements further away from the subject, which compromises the
Tx-performance. We designed and constructed a prototype of a 16-channel human
head phased array, which consists of 8 TxRx-surface “horizontal” loops
circumscribing a head, and 8 Rx-only “vertical” loops positioned along the
central axis (parallel to B0)
of each TxRx-loop perpendicularly to its surface.Methods:
The array consists of
8 overlapped horizontal (10.5 cm in width; 10 cm in length) TxRx-loops, and 8
vertical (3.3 cm x 10 cm) Rx-only loops (Fig.1) and measures 20 cm in width (left-right) and
23 cm in height (anterior-posterior). Overlapping of adjacent horizontal loops provides excellent
decoupling below -30 dB (Fig.2) (4). All vertical loops are decoupled by
preamplifier decoupling during reception and actively detuned during
transmission. The array is shielded with a cylindrical shield at 4-cm distance
to the coil elements. Electromagnetic simulations of the transmit B1+ field and the local specific absorption rate
(SAR) were performed using CST Studio Suite 2015 (CST, Darmstadt, Germany) and
the time-domain solver based on the finite-integration technique (FIT). We also
included vertical Rx-only loops into simulations since the presence of actively
detuned Rx-only elements may substantially alter the maximal local SAR (5). Three voxel models were used, i.e. a head/shoulder (HS)
phantom (3), which was constructed to match tissue properties (ε =
58.6, σ =0.64
S/m at 400 MHz) (3), and two virtual family multi-tissue models, “Duke” and
“Ella”. Experimental B1+
maps were obtained using the AFI sequence (6). All data were acquired on
a Siemens Magnetom 9.4T human imaging system.Results and Discussion:
First we performed a safety
evaluation of the array including EM modeling (B1+, SAR) and phantom imaging. Simulations
showed that the maximum local SAR was increased by less than 3%, and B1+ efficiency decreased by less than 1% due
to introduction of the vertical loops. Then we conducted in-vivo experiments
(Fig.3). Averaged over the 20-mm central slab B1+ measures 12.4 ± 2.7 μT/√kW
in
case of the 16-channel design versus 12.5 ± 2.8 μT/√kW in case of the
8-channel design. Introduction of the vertical Rx-only loops improved the in-vivo SNR
near the coil center by ~28% and at the periphery by ~30% to 40%. Finally we
compared parallel Rx-performance of the 16-channel array with that obtained
using 8 horizontal loops only (Table 1). As an example Fig.4 demonstrates
transversal G-factor maps obtained near the array center. At high acceleration
(AF=5) the 16-channel mode improves an average G-factor up to 20% for an
acceleration in the AP-direction.
An idea of combining
vertical and horizontal loops is similar to a recently proposed method of
combining dipole antennas with surface loops to provide for better SNR (7). According
to an ultimate intrinsic SNR approach, a combination of the curl-free and
divergence-free currents on a cylindrical surface is required to produce an
optimal SNR (8,9). In our case the curl-free
current component is produced by vertical loops, which are easier to construct
in terms of matching, tuning, decoupling, and active detuning, than dipole
antennas.Conclusion:
As a proof of concept
we developed a method of increasing the number of Rx-elements in a human head
transceiver array without the necessity of moving the transmit loops away from the
subject head and thus compromising the Tx-efficiency. We constructed a
prototype of a 16-channel 9.4T tight-fit head phased array, which consists of 8
horizontal TxRx-surface loops circumscribing a head, and 8 Rx-only vertical loops
placed at the center of each TxRx-loop. We demonstrated both experimentally and
numerically that addition of the vertical loops substantially improves the Rx-performance
without compromising the Tx-performance and the maximum local SAR. To further
improve SNR and the longitudinal coverage along the array axis, increasing the
overall number of array elements, (i.e. double-row 16-TxRx-element and 32-Rx-element
array) is required.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
References:
1) Gilbert
KM et al, MRM 2010;67:1487. 2) Avdievich
NI et al,
Proc.ISMRM 22,2014,622. 3) Shajan G et al, MRM 2014;71:870. 4) Avdievich
NI et al, Proc.ISMRM 24,2016,169. 5) Krishnamurthy N
et al, JMRI 2014;39:475. 6) Yarnykh VL. MRM 2007;57:192. 7) Chen G
et al, Proc.ISMRM 23,2015,3133. 8) Lattanzi R et al, MRM
2012;68:286. 9) Pfrommer A et al, Proc.ISMRM
24,2016,175.