Ramon Francisco Barajas Jr1,2, Bronwyn E Hamilton1, David R Pettersson1, Daniel L Schwartz2,3, Jenny Firkins3, Prakash Ambady3, Andrea Horvath3, Heather L McConnell3, Joao Prola-Netto1,3, Csanad Varallyay1,3, Jerry J Jaboin4, Charlotte D Kubicky4, Ahmed M Raslan5, Aclan Dogan5, Jeremy Ciporen5, Leslie L Muldoon3, William Rooney2, and Edward A Neuwelt3,5
1Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States, 2Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States, 3Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States, 4Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States, 5Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
Synopsis
Ferumoxytol iron nanoparticles
are used as an off label molecular MR imaging contrast agent in patients with
reduced renal function precluding gadolinium administration. Glioblastoma molecular features are now
recognized as an integral component of glioma pathogenetic classification and
clinical outcome. IDH1 mutation accounts
for approximately 10% of glioblastoma.
The absence of a reliable noninvasive biomarker of glioblastoma IDH
mutation prompted this retrospective study to determine if Ferumoxytol MR
Imaging is diagnostic of IDH mutational status.
We observed that the
presence of increased Ferumoxytol to Gadolinum enhancing ratio was a
significant 3T MR imaging biomarker for IDH mutational status in recurrent glioblastoma
and the differentiation of pseudoprogression.
Purpose
Glioblastoma is a uniformly fatal disease. Recent genetic molecular advances have
contributed to a better understanding of glioblastoma pathophysiology. Mutations
involving the IDH1 and IDH2 encoding genes have been described as glioblastoma genetic
driver mutations.1-4 Currently,
the diagnosis of IDH mutational status requires surgical tissue sampling. A reliable noninvasive biomarker of IDH
mutation has not been previously described.
Therefore, the primary aim of this retrospective study was to determine
if Ferumoxytol (Feraheme, AMAG pharmaceuticals) iron nanoparticle contrast
enhanced (FeCE) MR Imaging was diagnostic of glioblastoma IDH mutational status. Additionally, given the ability of FeCE to
demonstrate neuroinflammation we aimed to determine if recurrent disease could
be differentiated from pseudoprogression in this cohort.
Methods
In this IRB-approved study,
28 patients (21 males, 7 females, mean age 57.7 years old ± 11.1 years) previously treated with maximal safe
resection and temozolomide based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following diagnosis of
glioblastoma underwent gadolinium contrast enhanced (gadoteridol, Bracco) (GdCE) and then FeCE MR imaging to assess disease progression on a 3T clinical scanner
(Philips Healthcare). The patients
reported in this study are of a separate cohort reported by Horvath et. al.5 IDH1 mutational status was characterized by
exome sequencing. FeCE was performed
with T1-weighted spin echo MR imaging 24 hours following the intravenous
administration of 4 to 8 mg/kg Ferumoxytol.
All GdCE MR examinations were performed within 48 hours before
Ferumoxytol administration. The sum of
products diameter (SPD) was calculated according to RANO criteria at the tumor
location for both contrast agents.6
The mismatch between enhancing lesions SPD was calculated as a ratio of FeCE
to GdCE. Students t-test was used to
assess for differences in SPD and FeCE/GdCE ratios between the cohorts. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis
provided an optimal cutoff value allowing for the determination of sensitivity
and specificity. P-value less than 0.05
was considered statistically significant.
Results
Three of the 28 patients
were found to have mutated IDH1 status. Patients
with IDH mutation (mean ± standard
deviation, 0.92 ± 0.21) were
found to have a significantly lower FeCE/GdCE SPD ratio when compared to wild
type tumors (1.1 ± 0.07; P=0.01;
Figure 1). ROC analysis demonstrated an
optimal cutoff value of 1.00 which provided a sensitivity of 1.0 and
specificity of 0.8. No significant
difference was observed between measured GdCE or FeCE SPD within the IDH mutated
or wild type tumors (P> 0.64).
Recurrent disease was
diagnosed in 25 patients (22 IDH wild type).
The remaining 3 patients demonstrated clinical and radiographical
evidence of pseudoprogression. All
patients with pseudoprogression were IDH wild type. Patients with pseudoprogession at the time of
Ferumoxytol administration demonstrated a significantly elevated FeCE/GdCE
ratio (2.43 ± 0.27) when compared to IDH
matched recurrent disease (1.11 ± 0.21; P=
0.01; Figure 1).Discussion
Our preliminary data suggests that, following CRT, patients with
recurrent IDH wild type glioblastoma demonstrate increased
FeCE/GdCE ratios when compared to IDH mutated tumors. Additionally, we observed that patients with
IDH wild type pseudoprogression demonstrate markedly disproportionate elevations
in FeCE/GdCE when compared to IDH matched disease recurrence. McConnell et. al. have demonstrated that FeCE is
a molecular MR imaging biomarker of tumor associated neuroinflammation.7 As such, increased levels of
neuroinflammation within recurrent IDH wild type glioblastoma following CRT may
account for the observed increased FeCE/GdCE ratios. Interestingly, the degree of FeCE/GdCE was
most prominent in patients with pseudoprogression (all greater then 2.26). These findings suggest that while treatment-induced
neuroinflammation is observed within recurrent disease and pseudoprogression, it is disproportionately so within the latter. This is consistent with the current
pathophysiological understanding of neuroinflammation-mediated
pseudoprogression.8 When stratified by IDH mutaiton, the
mechanistic differences in CRT-induced neuroinflammation within recurrent
glioblastoma remains to be adjudicated.
Unlike GdCE, FeCE allows for specific localization of the inflammation within brain
tumors at delayed imaging time points.6 The results of this study suggest that the unique
capability of iron nanoparticle contrast agents to localize sites of
neuroinflammation may allow them to serve as a sensitive and specific biomarker of
glioblastoma IDH mutational status.
These results are clinically
significant as there are currently no reliable and noninvasive imaging
biomarkers of glioblastoma IDH mutational status. The validation
of a quantifiable and biologically specific imaging biomarker for
neuroinflammation has the potential to significantly advance the field of
neuroimaging. Any hope for improving
clinical outcomes lies in the development of personalized therapeutic regiments and imaging strategies.
Together,
these approaches could impact treatment, imaging, and survival in patients with
glioblastoma.
Conclusion
FeCE/GdCE mismatch provides a robust imaging
biomarker capable of identifying IDH mutational status and
neuroinfammation-induced pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma. Acknowledgements
The first author thanks the patients that participated in this study and the hard work of the staff of the OHSU Blood Brain Barrier Program.
References
1. Ichimura K. Molecular pathogenesis of IDH
mutations in gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2012 Jul;29(3):131-9.
2. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, et al. An
integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science.
2008;321:1807–1812.
3. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et
al. The 2016 World Health Organization
Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20.
4. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. The definition of primary and secondary
glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:764–772.
5. Horvath A, Varallyay C, Schwartz D, et
al. Quantitative, semiautomatic
comparison of ferumoxytol and gadoteridol enhancement in treated glioma
patients. 2017 ISMRM submitted abstract.
6. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for
high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72.
7. McConnell HL, Schwartz DL, Richardson BE, et
al. Ferumoxytol nanoparticle uptake in
brain during acute neuroinflammation is cell-specific. Nanomedicine. 2016 Aug;12(6):1535-42.
8. Brandsma D1, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P,
van den Bent MJ. Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of
pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):453-61.