Cecile Bordier1, Carlo Nicolini1, and Angelo Bifone1
1Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto (TN), Italy
Synopsis
Graph theoretical methods have been widely applied
to study the modular organization of functional connectivity networks in
neuropsychiatric disorders like Schizophrenia. However, current methods are
affected by a resolution limit that prevents detection of modules that are
smaller than a scale determined by the size of the entire network. We have
developed a resolution-limit-free method, dubbed Surprise, and applied it to study
resting state functional connectivity networks in a large cohort of Schizophrenia
patients and matched controls. Improved resolution reveals substantial
reorganization of resting state connectivity structure in patients, with previously
undetected fragmentation and merging of sensory and associative modules.
Introduction
Abnormal patterns of brain functional connectivity
have been observed in a number of neuropsyhiatric conditions, including
schizophrenia (SZ). The effects of these alterations on the modular
organization of brain connectivity networks can be investigated using a graph
representation of the resting state fMRI data and analytical methods derived
from graph theory1. Previous results using standard community
detection methods have shown reduction in functional connectivity strength in
SZ patients, with a largely preserved modular organization. However, it has
been recognized that current methods suffer from a resolution limit as they fail to detect modules that are
smaller than a scale determined by the size of the entire network. This
fundamental limitation may have affected previous studies, and prevented
detection of differences in the modular structure of connectivity networks in
SZ patients and controls. Recently, we have developed a resolution-limit-free
method grounded on probability theory that overcomes these limitations2,3. Here, we present the first application to a large
dataset of resting state fMRI data from SZ patients vs. healthy controls.Methods
This study used the resting state
fMRI sample data of 78 schizophrenia (strict) patients and 91 healthy control
subjects from the Center for Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE)4 ( COINS:http://coinsmrn.org/dx). The nodes of
the connectivity networks were defined from a brain atlas parcellation scheme
comprising 638 regions5. The edge weights were calculated from the
inter-regional Pearson correlation coefficients. Group-average networks were
computed for the two cohorts by Fisher-transformation and averaging of the
individuals’ connectivity matrices.
Asymptotical Surprise, a fitness function that has
been shown to resolve the modular structure of connectivity graphs with
unprecedented resolution and accuracy2,3, was
used to extract the modular structure of the resting state networks. Network
Based Statistics was used to compare connectivity in the two groups, and
network- and node-wise parameters, including global efficiency and
participation coefficients, were calculated for the two groups.Results
The patients’ group showed overall weaker resting
state functional connectivity compared to controls, with a significant decrease
in average degree (25.73 vs 53.83, respectively) and global efficiency (0.23
versus 0.32, respectively), in line with previous studies.
Surprise maximization resulted
in a finer subdivision of modules than previously reported, with a heterogeneous
size distribution and a comparable number of modules in the two groups (41 and
39 in controls and patients, respectively) (Fig. 1). However, the modular
organization of resting state networks appears substantially different in the
two cohorts (Fig. 2). Notable differences include the fragmentation of the
controls’ large motorsensory module into three smaller modules, which however
include parts of the associative parietal cortices that are not associated with
sensory networks in the control group. Similarly, connectivity of the temporal
and supramarginal cortices appears substantially reorganized in SZ patients,
with language and auditory structures mixing into functionally integrated
modules.Discussion
The observation of a
comparable number of modules in the two cohorts is somewhat surprising in the
light of the strong reduction in overall connectivity in the SZ group. The
disintegration of the sensory module in patients, and the mixing of sensory and
associative modules may account for some of positive symptoms of SZ, which
include sensory hallucinations. The reorganization and integration of auditory
and language modules is particularly interesting, and may provide a mechanism for
the auditory hallucinations often experienced by SZ patients.Conclusion
Optimization of
Surprise made it possible to study the modular organization of functional
connectivity beyond the resolution limit that characterizes other widely
applied graph theoretical methods. In sharp contrast with previous studies,
this approach revealed a substantial reorganization of functional modules in
patients that may provide a key to understand some of the symptoms of this
complex disease. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Bullmore, E. T. & Sporns,
O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and
functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198 (2009).
2. Nicolini,
C. & Bifone, A. Modular structure of brain functional networks: breaking
the resolution limit by Surprise. Sci. Rep. 19250 (2016).
3. Nicolini,
C., Bordier, C. & Bifone, A. Modular organization of weighted brain
networks beyond the resolution limit. NeuroImage
(in press).
4. Çetin,
M. S. et al. Thalamus and posterior temporal lobe show greater
inter-network connectivity at rest and across sensory paradigms in
schizophrenia. Neuroimage 97, 117–126 (2014).
5. Crossley,
N. A. et al. Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human
brain functional coactivation network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110,
11583–11588 (2013).