Deanne K Thompson1,2,3, Claire E Kelly1, Jian Chen1,4, Richard Beare1,4, Marc L Seal1,3, Peter J Anderson1,3, Lex W Doyle1,5,6, Alicia J Spittle1,5,7, and Jeanie LY Cheong1,5,6
1Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia, 2Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia, 3Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 4Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Univeristy, Melbourne, Australia, 5Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 7Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Synopsis
Many
early life factors contribute to how well a preterm child will develop, and
these affect the brain differently based on how early the infant is born. The
current study found that earlier
gestational age is related to smaller brain volumes and less mature white
matter at term-equivalent age. Correlated with these brain measures were lower
birthweight SD score, multiple birth or high social risk. We show that infants
born moderate and late preterm have altered brain development, not just those
born very preterm, and there is a differential effect of early life
predictors based on gestational age.
Introduction
Very
preterm (VP; born <32 weeks’ gestational age; GA) infants currently attract
the most attention. However, infants born moderate (MP; 32-33 weeks’ GA) and late
preterm (LP; 34-36 weeks’ GA) also have higher rates of impairment than
children born full-term (FT; ≥37 weeks’ GA).1 Many perinatal
predictors for brain abnormality in VP infants are known, but the risk
factors associated with brain growth and development in MP and LP
infants are currently understudied, and likely differ from those identified for
VP infants. Aims: (1) Determine the
effect of GA on brain volumes and white matter (WM) microstructure at
term-equivalent age; (2) Investigate the effects of early life predictors on
brain volumes and WM microstructure, and if these relationships differ
according to GA. Methods
592 infants were recruited including VP (<30 weeks’ GA),
MP, LP, and FT.
T2-weighted (TR 8910ms, TE 152ms, 1mm3 isotropic voxels) and diffusion-weighted
images (TR 20400ms, TE 120ms, 1.2mm3 isotropic voxels, 45 non-collinear
gradient directions, b-values 100-1200 s/mm2) were acquired
on a 3T Siemens scanner at term equivalent age (38-44 weeks’ GA). The automated Morphologically Adaptive Neonatal
Tissue Segmentation (MANTiS) classified T2
images into WM and cortical grey matter (CGM).2 Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was performed on CGM and WM
tissue maps3 for 91
VP, 63 MP, 103 LP and 70 FT infants. Diffusion images were
corrected for motion, eddy current,4 and echo planar image
distortions. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean (MD), axial (AD) and radial diffusivity
(RD) images were analyzed using Tract-Based
Spatial Statistics (TBSS)5 for 92 VP, 69 MP, 120
LP and 80 FT infants. FSL’s Randomise was used with 1-factor 4-levels ANOVA
models to test between GA groups, and post-hoc comparisons between GA
increments (VP vs. MP, MP vs. LP, LP vs. FT). Perinatal variables (birthweight
SD score, sex, multiple births, early postnatal growth, social risk) were
correlated with volume and diffusion maps, with post-hoc tests to determine GA
group differences. GA at MRI was adjusted for, and additionally intracranial
volume for VBM analyses.Results
GA group was associated with regions
making up 28% of the total CGM volume, including occipital, temporal, parietal
and frontal lobes, and 3% of the WM volume, including the temporal lobe and
corpus callosum (Figure 1). The main differences were between the VP vs. MP
groups, with higher volume for the MP group in frontal lobe CGM and temporal
lobe WM. There was also a small region in the corpus callosum that had lower
volume in the LP vs. FT group.
GA group had a significant association
with FA (67% of the white matter skeleton), AD (45%), RD (59%) and MD (53%), located
in most major WM tracts (Figure 2). While there were some regions of lower FA
and higher RD and MD in the VP vs. MP infants (particularly corpus callosum), WM
microstructural differences were more evident between LP and FT groups, with
lower FA and higher RD, MD and AD in the LP group, located in corpus callosum,
motor and visual tracts. The opposite pattern was seen for some regions within
cerebellar WM.
Birthweight
SD score was positively associated with CGM and WM volume in much of the brain for
all GA groups, but diminished substantially after adjusting for intracranial
volume. Birthweight SD score was also positively associated with FA and
negatively with MD, RD and AD in many major tracts, driven mainly by the MP and
LP groups.
CGM
and WM volumes were higher in males than females, particularly for the MP and
FT groups, but this diminished substantially after adjusting for intracranial
volume. MD, RD and AD were higher in the internal and external capsule and
optic radiations in males than females, driven mainly by the LP and FT groups.
Multiple
birth was associated with lower frontal CGM and corpus callosum volume than
single birth, particularly for the MP group.
Frontal-parietal
CGM and WM and temporal WM volume were reduced for high vs. low social risk,
particularly for LP and FT groups, but this disappeared after adjusting for
intracranial volume.
Discussion
Earlier GA is related to smaller brain volumes and
less mature WM at term-equivalent age, with corpus callosum and temporal lobe
particularly affected. This study provides
further evidence that brain vulnerabilities are not restricted to VP infants. Early life predictors that alter or delay
brain development include lower birthweight SD score, multiple birth or high
social risk, with a differential effect based on GA. Conclusion
This study helps determine the underlying causes and
mechanisms for brain abnormalities in infants at risk of adverse outcomes. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Woythaler MA, McCormick MC, Smith VC. Late preterm
infants have worse 24-month neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants.
Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):e622-629.
2. Beare R, Chen J, Kelly CE, et al. Neonatal Brain
Tissue Classification with Morphological Adaptation and Unified Segmentation.
Front Neuroinform. 2016;10(12). doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00012.
3. Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Aljabar P, Srinivasan L, et
al. A dynamic 4D probabilistic atlas of the developing brain. NeuroImage.
2011;54(4):2750-2763.
4. Jenkinson M and Smith S. A global optimisation
method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal.
2001;5(2):143-156.
5. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, et al.
Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion
data. NeuroImage. 2006;31(4):1487-1505.