Shannon Kolind1,2, Irene Vavasour2, Roger Tam2, Lisa Tang3, Alexander Rauscher2,4, Robert Carruthers1, Rick White5, Victoria Levesque6, Hideki Garren6, David Clayton6, David Li2, and Anthony Traboulsee1
1Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Conventional MRI scans cannot evaluate disease-related changes in
normal-appearing white matter, and have limited sensitivity for detecting
changes in chronic lesions. In this work, we employed 2 quantitative MRI measures
related to myelin content, myelin water fraction and magnetization transfer
ratio, to evaluate the effects a potential novel therapy for multiple sclerosis
(ocrelizumab) compared to a commonly-used therapy (interferon beta-1a). Over 2
years, these myelin-related
measurements increased or remained stable in all regions for patients taking ocrelizumab,
while they decreased for interferon beta-1a. These results support the
use of quantitative MRI measures for more efficient, biologically specific
clinical trial outcomes.
Introduction
MRI is routinely used to
assess treatment effects in multiple sclerosis (MS) on the prevention of the
development of new lesions. However, conventional scans cannot evaluate
disease-related changes in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and have
limited sensitivity for detecting changes in chronic lesions. Advanced MRI may
improve sensitivity for clinical trials so that treatment effects are detected
more reliably with fewer patients, and improve specificity, such that
mechanisms of action can be identified and results can be more accurately
interpreted. In this substudy we employed 2 quantitative MRI measures related
to myelin content to evaluate the effects of ocrelizumab (OCR), a potential novel
therapy for MS, compared to a commonly used therapy (interferon beta-1a
(IFNb-1a)). The first MRI measure was the myelin water fraction (fM)
as estimated using mcDESPOT1, a multi-component relaxometry
technique that predominantly isolates signal from water trapped between myelin
bilayers. The second was the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), which is
sensitive to the interaction between macromolecules (including those found in
myelin) and bulk water2. We
hypothesized that fM and MTR measurements in NAWM and chronic
lesions would aid in detecting treatment effects associated with OCR and
INFb-1a.
Methods
56 relapsing MS patients
from a single centre participating in a multi-centre phase III randomized
clinical trial of OCR versus IFNb-1a (OPERA II; NCT01412333) were scanned on a
Philips 3T Achieva at weeks 0, 24, 48 and 96. 24 age- and sex-matched healthy
controls (HC) were also scanned at weeks 0, 48 and 96. Scanning sequences
included mcDESPOT imaging (53 RMS patients and 24 HC, 1.7x1.7x1.7mm, whole
brain)3 and an MT sequence (37 RMS patients and 24 HC,
TE/TR=3.7/85ms, 1x1x5mm, 20 slices, flip angle 18o). Average fM
and MTR values were calculated voxelwise across the whole cerebrum for all
NAWM, as well as for 4 white matter tracts (excluding lesions): the corpus
callosum (CC), cortical spinal tract (CST), inferior longitudinal fasciculus
(ILF), and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). Lesions were detected using
a semi-automated approach based on T2- and proton density-weighted images;
chronic lesion regions of interest consisted of voxels identified as lesion
across all time points, excluding lesions that were enhancing at any time
point. A mixed-effect model was used to assess all data collected over time on
each participant; the fixed effects were treatment group, visit and
treatment-by-visit interaction. In addition, a one-way ANOVA was used to assess
the effect of treatment group on the percent change from baseline to week 96.Results
NAWM: From the mixed-effect
model, all regions showed similar trends in treatment-by-visit interaction for fM
(CC p=0.04, CST p=0.02, ILF p=0.01, SLF p=0.02, all NAWM p=0.04). Percentage
changes from week 0 to 96 are illustrated with p-values from the one-way ANOVA in
figure 1; fM for patients taking OCR increased or remained stable in
all regions, while it decreased for INFb-1a. MTR results demonstrated a similar
pattern across all regions (figure 1).
Lesions: From the mixed-effect
model, the treatment-by-visit interaction was significant for MTR (p=0.01) and
there was a trend for fM (p=0.06). The percentage changes from
baseline to week 96 are illustrated with p-values from the one-way ANOVA in
figure 2.
Discussion
Consistent patterns of
results from the independently acquired but related measures of myelin
integrity - fM and MTR - provide support for the hypothesis that OCR
prevents diffuse myelin loss in NAWM over 2 years. This may relate to its
prevention of new lesion development and subsequent Wallerian degeneration
and/or suppression of diffuse inflammation and microglial activation that may
contribute to progression in MS. Lesions also demonstrated potential treatment
effects, suggesting that fM and MTR may be increasing over time in
existing lesions with OCR treatment. Further evidence of repair may be gained
by our continued monitoring of these patients for a further period of at least
2 years in an open label extension of the clinical trial.Conclusion
Use of
quantitative measures related to myelin demonstrated consistent trends between
groups treated with either OCR or INFb-1a across several regions in NAWM and
lesions. Detection of this effect with such a small cohort (less than 5% of the
population of the entire clinical trial) provides support for the use of
advanced MRI measures for more efficient, biologically specific outcome
measures in clinical trial of MS.
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by Genentech, Inc. We are grateful for support from the Milan & Maureen Ilich Foundation.
References
1Deoni MRM 2008;60:1372.
2Wolff
MRM 1989;10:135.
3Deoni MRM
2013;70:147.