Zhengyang Zhou1, huayong zhang2, and Weibo Chen3
1Department of Radiology, Drum Tower Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China, 2Department of Rheumatology, Drum Tower Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, People's Republic of China, 3Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
Synopsis
Sixteen SS patients and age- and gender- match healthy
volunteers underwent parotid MR imaging to evaluate whether T1ρ values could diagnose of SS
patients. T1ρ values between the patients and healthy volunteers were compared.
ROC analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the T1ρ values.
The T1ρ values of SS patients were significantly higher than those of healthy
volunteers. With a cutoff value of 88.02 ms, the diagnostic sensitivity and
specificity of the parotid T1ρ value was 75.0% and 100.0%, respectively.
Parotid T1ρ MR imaging held the potential in the diagnosis of SS without
morphological changes of glands.
PURPOSE
To explore the
feasibility of parotid spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T1ρ)
MR imaging in the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) without morphological
changes of the parotid glands in conventional MR imaging.
METHODS
Sixteen consecutive SS patients without morphological changes of parotid glands in conventional MR imaging and 16 age- and gender- match healthy volunteers underwent parotid 3.0 T MR imaging, including T1ρ sequence. All the subjects underwent T1ρ MR scanning again after 3 months. T1 signal intensities and T1ρ values of bilateral parotid glands were compared using paired samples t-test. Parotid T1 signal intensities and T1ρ values between the patients and healthy volunteers were compared using two independent samples t-test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parotid T1ρ values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate the reproducibility of parotid T1ρ measurements.RESULTS
There were no
significant differences of T1 signal intensities and T1ρ values between
bilateral parotid glands in whether SS patients or healthy volunteers (all P
> 0.05). The parotid T1ρ values of SS patients (96.47 ± 15.38 ms) were
significantly higher than those of healthy volunteers (84.25 ± 6.11 ms) (P <
0.001), while there were no significant differences of T1 signal
intensitiesbetween SS patients and healthy volunteers (P = 0.655). With a
cutoff value of 88.02 ms, the sensitivity and specificity
of the parotid T1ρ value was 75.0% and 100.0% in the diagnosis of SS,
respectively. The reproducibilityof parotid T1ρ measurement was excellent (ICC:
0.934 -0.995).DISCUSSION
T1ρ imaging was a sensitive modality to
investigate the macromolecular composition and proton exchanges in tissues. We
speculated that the increased parotid T1ρ values in SS patients might be due to
the increased expression and activation of ECM and elevated levels of proteins
such as LMs. In addition, Paez et al. detected increased protein levels of ECM
in SS1 patients with low interacinar fibrosis rather than SS2 patients with
advanced morphological changes.CONCLUSION
Parotid T1ρ MR
imaging held the potential in the diagnosis of SS without morphological changes
of parotid glands.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Vitali C, Monti P, Giuggioli C, et al.
Parotid sialography and lip biopsy in the evaluation of oral component in
Sjogren's syndrome. Clinical and experimental rheumatology 1989;7(2):131-135.
7.
2.Kalk WW, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK,
Bootsma H, Kallenberg CG, Roodenburg JL. Parotid sialography for diagnosing
Sjogren syndrome. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology,
and endodontics 2002;94(1):131-137.
3.Tomiita
M, Ueda T, Nagata H, et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance sialography in
patients with juvenile Sjogren's syndrome. Clinical and experimental
rheumatology 2005;23(4):540-544
4.Kato
H, Kanematsu M, Toida M, et al. Salivary gland function evaluated by
diffusion-weighted MR imaging with gustatory stimulation: preliminary results.
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2011;34(4):904-909.