Manuel Stich1, Tobias Wech1, Anne Slawig1, Ralf Ringler2, Andrew Dewdney 3, Andreas Greiser3, Gudrun Ruyters3, Thorsten Bley1, and Herbert Köstler1
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 2X-Ray & Molecular Imaging Lab, Technical University Amberg-Weiden, Weiden, Germany, 3Siemens, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
The gradient
impulse response function (GIRF) completely characterizes the gradient system
as a linear and time-invariant (LTI) system, and has recently been
used to correct for distorted k-space trajectories in image reconstruction. We
now report on the implementation of a GIRF-based pre-emphasis, which is
resulting in gradient waveforms already matching the desired k-space trajectory
and rendering post-corrections obsolete. The method was successfully tested in
a sequence with modulated phase-encoding gradients, as for example used in Wave-CAIPI.
Purpose
K-space trajectories are frequently impaired by eddy
currents, readout timing and amplifier errors and other system imperfections.
The gradient impulse response function (GIRF) has been used to describe the
distorted k-space trajectory for image reconstruction [1]. Purpose of this work
was to use the GIRF to determine the pre-emphasis for an undistorted gradient
output and intended k-space trajectory. As an example, a sequence with phase-encoding gradient modulation as it is used
for Wave-CAIPI [2] was corrected.
Methods
The gradient echo sequence with phase-encoding
gradient modulation (Fig. 1) [3] was implemented on a 3T MR system (MAGNETOM
Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and subsequently applied on a
structural phantom and on in-vivo head measurements. Compared to a standard
gradient echo sequence, the used prototype sequence plays out an additional
oscillating harmonic gradient waveform in phase-encoding direction during data
acquisition. The frequency of the sine-wave was set to 10 kHz, and the intended
maximum gradient amplitude (nominal amplitude) was 3.0 mT/m. Other sequence
parameters were: TR = 5.4 ms (TR = 20.0 ms for the in-vivo measurements), TE =
2.6 ms, read-out bandwidth = 930 Hz/pixel.
A separate GIRF of the MR system for each spatial
dimension was determined using triangular input gradients [4, 5]. 12 different
input gradients (duration 100 – 320 µs, slew rate = 180 T/m/s) were played out,
and the system’s response was measured in two parallel slices of a spherical
phantom. The output gradient was then calculated using the difference in phase
evolution between both slices. The relevant measurement parameters were set to:
TR = 8.0 s, slice thickness = 3 mm, slice gap = 33 mm, flip-angle = 90°, read-out
bandwidth = 100 Hz/pixel, 60 averages. For the test sequence with
phase-encoding gradient modulation, acquisitions were first performed using the
intended gradient waveform (i.e. the nominal gradient output, Fig. 1A). Images of the structural
phantom and the in-vivo measurements were then reconstructed using convolution
gridding [6] and the trajectory derived from 1A.
Subsequently, the GIRF was used to correct the
gradient waveform played out in 1A in post-processing (i.e. the GIRF trajectory
prediction as proposed in [5], Fig. 1B), and images were reconstructed using
the updated k-space trajectory.
Finally, corresponding acquisitions were performed
using gradient waveforms additionally corrected by a GIRF-based pre-emphasis
(Fig. 1C), and images were reconstruction using the trajectory derived from the
nominal waveform in 1A.Results
The magnitude
of the relevant GIRFyy is shown in Fig. 2. At a frequency of 10 kHz,
the GIRFyy amplitude dropped to 79 % with a phase of 0.04 rad. This
means that the amplitude of the actually played out oscillating gradient drops
to 0.79 · 3.0
mT/m = 2.4 mT/m (GIRF trajectory prediction, Fig. 1B). To reach an actually
played out oscillating gradient with maximum amplitude of 3.0 mT, it was
necessary to apply a GIRF-based pre-emphasis on the input waveform leading to a
maximum amplitude of 3.0/0.79 mT/m = 3.8 mT/m (Fig. 1C).
Figure 3 shows
the reconstructed phantom images (i), together with the intensity profile in
frequency-encoding direction at the position of the dashed line (ii). Ghosting-artifacts
are present if no correction is applied (Fig. 3A, i, ii). When considering the
reduced frequency transmission rate and delay of the gradient system within a
GIRF-predicted correction of the trajectories in post-processing, the image
artifacts are suppressed (Fig. 3B, i, ii). The image acquired using the GIRF-based
pre-emphasis can be reconstructed free from artifacts using the initially
intended trajectory (Fig. 3C, i, ii).
The in-vivo
head acquisitions are showing equivalent results: ghosting-artifacts, which are
present in the image without any correction (Fig. 4A) can be removed by
applying a gradient waveform corrected by a GIRF-pre-emphasis (Fig. 4B).Discussion & Conclusion
Due to the
sinusoidal gradient, consisting of only one frequency component, the sequence
with phase-encoding gradient modulation is a straightforward example for a GIRF-based
pre-emphasis implementation. While this type of sequence has gained a lot of
interest recently [2, 7, 8], its application is still rather uncommon. However,
applying a pre-emphasis based on the GIRF information can in principle be
applied to any arbitrary sequence type. In summary, our results prove that the
gradient impulse response function information can serve for a novel pre-emphasis.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Vannesjo S.J. et. al. Image Reconstruction Using a
Gradient Impulse Response Model for Trajectory Prediction. MRM.
2016;76:45-58.
[2] Bilgic B. et. al.
Wave CAIPI for Highly Accelerated 3D Imaging. MRM. 2015;73:2152-2162.
[3] Hinks R.S., Xiang Q-S., Henkelman R.M. Ghost Phase
Cancellation with Phase-encoding Gradient Modulation. MRM. 1993;3:777-785.
[4] Liu H., Matson G.B. Accurate Measurement of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Gradient Characteristics. Materials (Basel). 2014;7:1–15.
[5] Campbell-Washburn AE. et. al. Real-time distortion
correction of spiral and echo planar images using the gradient system impulse
response function. MRM. 2016;75:2278-2285.
[6] Fessler J.A., Sutton B.P. Nonuniform fast Fourier
transforms using min-max interpolation. IEEE
Transactions on Signal Processing. 2003;51:560-572.
[7] Cauley S.F.
Autocalibrated wave-CAIPI reconstruction;
Joint optimization of k-space trajectory and parallel imaging reconstruction.
MRM. 2016. [Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1002/mrm.26499].
[8] Liebig P.,
Heidemann R.M., Porter D.A. Echo-planar imaging on a true zig-zag trajectory.
ESMRMB Congress 2015. S.100.