Diffusion weighted EPI is susceptible to distortions due to multiple causes, and the amount of distortion is dependent on many interacting factors. Hence no good methodology currently exists for assessing and characterizing these distortions. In this work an EPI sequence is modified to include Spatial Modulation of Magnetization (SPAMM), a preparation technique that produces tagged grid lines in the imaged volume. This sequence is acquired to measure induced distortion in several phantoms in different coils with different sequence options, measuring distortion as it varies with parallel imaging acceleration, diffusion weighting direction, and susceptibility of various phantom materials.
The proposed methodology utilizes a saturation technique known as Spatial Modulation of Magnetization (SPAMM) that tags the imaging subject with saturated grid lines1,2. Originally designed for tracking cardiac motion, these grids are applied here to assess spatial differences between diffusion weighting directions and/or b-values. For an absolute measurement, they can also be compared against a more geometrically robust sequence such as conventional fast spin echo. The saturation preparation sequence as implemented in this work consisted of binomially weighted (e.g. 1-3-3-1) pulses interleaved with gradient blips along the frequency encode direction, followed by the same sequence with gradient blips in the phase encode direction. Gradient area of the blips was adjustable and was typically set to produce line spacings of either 1.5 or 2.0 cm. Total time for the preparation sequence was about 9 msec.
Three phantoms were assessed: a spherical head-sized phantom in an 8-channel head coil, a large shimming phantom in the quadrature body coil, and a modified PET ACR phantom that included compartments of water, air, oil, and Teflon, scanned in a quadrature head coil. Each phantom was acquired with three sequences using parameters from a clinically appropriate protocol: a conventional DW-EPI sequence (3 orthogonal diffusion weighting directions), the tagged DW-EPI with identical sequence parameters, and the tagged FSE sequence. Sequence parameters in the head phantoms were: FOV = 22, thickness = 4mm, matrix = 128x128, b-value = 1000, ASSET acceleration factor = 2 and 1 (separate acquisitions), TR=8000, TE=64.2. Sequence parameters for the large FOV shim phantom were: FOV = 46, thickness = 5, matrix = 128x128, b-value = 800, TR=4000, TE-57.3. The spherical head phantom was used to assess differences with ASSET acceleration, the large shim phantom was used to assess eddy current induced differences between diffusion directions, and the modified PET ACR phantom was used to assess differences in materials of varying susceptibility. Differences in grid locations were visualized with minimum intensity projection between images, and manually measured using intersecting locations on the grids.
1. Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, Yang A, Shapiro EP: Human heart: tagging with MR imaging-a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology. 1988, 169: 59-63.
2. Axel L, Dougherty L: MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization. Radiology. 1989, 171: 841-845.