Sagar Mandava1, Mahesh B Keerthivasan1, Maria I Altbach2, and Ali Bilgin1,2,3
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 2Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
Synopsis
Subspace
constrained T2 mapping uses PCA to reconstruct a few principal components
instead of all the echo train images before T2 fitting. The temporal (contrast)
subspace in these methods is estimated either from acquired training data or via
training curves from a signal model. Typically, a single global PC basis is
used for all the contrast signals. In this work we present a T2 mapping method
based on non-local clustering of signal relaxation curves and tailor the PC
bases for the curves in each cluster and compare it with the global PC basis
approach.
Purpose
T2 mapping is an important method for
quantitative characterization of tissues. Conventional techniques based on spin-echo
or fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences require long acquisition times in order to
generate images at multiple echo times (TE) which are subsequently used for T2
fitting. Radial FSE methods have been shown to provide accurate T2 maps from
highly undersampled data [2,3]. These techniques combine accelerated radial
data acquisition with reconstruction methods using (global) subspace
constraints obtained via Principal Component Analysis (PCA) along the TE
dimension. The selection of the model order K (i.e., number of principal
components (PCs)) used during reconstruction involves a trade-off between model
error and noise amplification [4]. In this work, we introduce a T2 mapping
technique based on non-local clustering of signal relaxation curves which provides
reduced model error and leads to increased acceleration.Technique
Subspace constrained T2 mapping methods estimate
the temporal (contrast) subspace either from acquired training data [5] or from
training curves generated from a signal model [1-4]. Huang et al. [3] proposed
to use the Slice resolved Extended Phase Graph (SEPG) formulation [6] for the
signal model since this model accounts for indirect echoes caused by non-180o
refocusing pulses. Given T1, T2, B1 field, and the profiles
of the excitation and refocusing RF pulses, the SEPG model can provide the
signal decay curve. Sweeping over the expected range of parameter values,
a set of training curves are obtained. These curves are then used to generate a
PC basis. Since most of the variation in the training curves can be explained
by a small number of PCs, the signal can be constrained to lie in a lower
dimensional subspace by truncating the PC basis to keep only the most
significant K PCs. Given the truncated PC basis φK, the
reconstruction problem was formulated as shown in Figure 1(a) in [3,4]. Here,
the data consistency term incorporates the temporal subspace constraint due to
the use of the truncated PC basis φK.
Furthermore, a single global PC basis that accounts for the variations in the
entire image was used as illustrated in Figure 1(c). In contrast, our proposed
approach is shown in Figs. 1(b) and 1(d). The basic principle behind our
approach is that if the pixels can be divided into clusters with similar
temporal behavior, a separate truncated PC basis can be obtained for each
cluster, resulting in a more efficient representation of the temporal
characteristics of every pixel. The cluster membership can be determined using
a first pass reconstruction followed by k-means clustering. Methods
Simulations were performed to compare the model
errors associated with truncated global and non-local bases for typical T2 and
B1 values. The digital phantom experiments, based on the numerical phantom
developed by Guerquin-Kern [7], were also carried out to simulate a radial FSE
brain dataset with representative T1, T2, and B1 values of brain tissues,
ETL=16, and SNR=35dB at the first TE. For the in-vivo experiments, data was
acquired on a Siemens 3T Skyra scanner using a radial fast spin echo sequence
with echo spacing=8.78ms, ETL=16, TR=4000ms, slice thickness=5mm, 256 radial
views/TE, 256 readout points. The data was retrospectively undersampled to 16
radial views/TE to simulate acceleration. SEPG training curves were generated based
on the excite and refocusing slice profiles that were used in the pulse
sequence. K=4 was used in the in vivo results for the global method. Two
clusters with K1=3, K2=3 were used for the non-local method.Results and Discussion
Figure 2 shows the normalized
model error in the global and non-local PC bases when using 2 and 3 clusters. It
can be seen that the clustering in the non-local PC bases leads to
significantly reduced model error. Results of the digital phantom simulations
are presented in Figure 3(a). It can be seen that the proposed method with
non-local PC bases provides substantial reduction of undersampling artifacts in
the T2 maps. Figure 3(b) illustrates the overall normalized error for different
methods at various acceleration rates (views/TE). This plot suggests that the
proposed method could provide an additional factor of 4 increase in
acceleration rate in comparison to earlier methods. Figure 4 illustrates an in
vivo comparison of different methods. While some of the details are washed out
in the TE images obtained by the global PC basis, the proposed non-local method
preserves these details.Conclusions
A method which uses non-local clustering and
multiple PC bases to improve on (global) subspace constrained T2 mapping was
proposed. The results show that the proposed method can provide increased
acceleration in radial FSE T2 mapping applications.Acknowledgements
SM
acknowledges support from the TRIF Imaging fellowship and TRIF SEOS fellowship. References
1. M.
Doneva et. al., Compressed sensing reconstruction for magnetic resonance
parameter mapping, MRM, 2010.
2. C.
Huang et. al., T2 Mapping from Highly Undersampled Data by Reconstruction of
Principal Component Coefficient Maps (REPCOM) Using Compressed Sensing, MRM,
2012.
3. C.
Huang, et. al. T2 Relaxometry with Indirect Echo Compensation from Highly
Undersampled Data, MRM, 2013.
4. J.
Tamir et al., T2 Shuffling: Sharp, Multicontrast volumetric fast spin echo
imaging, MRM, 2016
5. B.
Zhao et al., Accelerated MR parametric mapping with low rank and sparsity
constraints, MRM, 2015.
6. RM
Lebel, AH Wilman. Transverse Relaxometry with Stimulated Echo Compensation, MRM,
2010.
7. Guerquin-Kern
et al., Realistic analytical phantoms for parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging.,
IEEE TMI, 2012