Ana E Rodríguez-Soto1, Michael C Langham1, Osheiza Abdulmalik2, and Felix W Wehrli1
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 2Division of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Synopsis
The
transverse relaxation rate (1/T2) of blood water protons is governed
by deoxyhemoglobin concentration, therefore providing a means to determine oxygen
saturation (HbO2) in vivo.
However, besides CPMG inter-pulse interval of the T2 preparation and
field strength, whole-blood T2 depends on sequence-specific
parameters. Balanced SSFP allows for rapid image acquisition and higher
in-plane resolution and thus provides an ideal readout for T2-based
oximetry. Here, we quantified T2 of human blood at 1.5T for the
entire range of HbO2 saturation levels using T2-prepared
bSSFP sequence. The data show the expected linearity of 1/T2 with
(1-HbO2)2 with the y-intercept depending on hematocrit.
PURPOSE
The transverse
relaxation rate of blood water protons has long been known to be governed by
deoxyhemoglobin concentration.1 Wright et al2 first described the relationship between blood
T2 and oxygen saturation (HbO2) in terms of a model derived
from the Luz-Meiboom equation for two-site chemical exchange, yielding: $$$\frac{1}{T_2}=\frac{1}{T_{2o}}+K(1-HbO_2)^2$$$. Here, T2 and T2o
are the transverse relaxation times of partially and fully oxygenated blood, respectively,
and K is a constant that depends on
field strength, hematocrit and refocusing pulse interval (τ180) of T2-preparation, and potentially, on the acquisition scheme. Values for K and T2o at various field strengths have been
described for T2-prepared EPI and spiral readouts.2-4 In these
methods the trade-off between scan duration and in-plane resolution is
considerable, making them less than ideal for in vivo studies in the body. In contrast, balanced steady-state
free precession (bSSFP) offers far more rapid image acquisition and higher
in-plane resolution. However, a calibration curve describing the relationship
between HbO2 and T2 of whole-blood estimated using T2-prepared
bSSFP does not exist. Therefore, in this work we quantify T2 of
human blood samples for the entire range of HbO2 saturation levels
using a T2-prepared sequence with bSSFP readout.METHODS
Fresh
whole blood was collected from four healthy human subjects (31.5±1.7 years old, 1 male) yielding a total of 35 samples, which were
scanned within 12hrs of blood draw. Samples were placed into an apparatus
consisting of 6 wells (35.4mm
diameter and 17.4mm height each) mounted on a shaker platform with an air-tight
lid. Blood was oxygenated to different HbO2 levels by varying time
of exposure to N2 gas. HbO2 was measured with a clinical
level blood gas analyzer. Once desired oxygenation levels were achieved blood
was transferred to 3mL syringes and sealed. Syringes were kept in a dry bath at
37°C and
then placed in a cylindrical container filled with distilled water at the same
temperature. This assembly was scanned at 1.5T (Siemens Avanto) with a 10-channel
head coil. Imaging parameters: TR=4400ms, T2-preparation
TEs=0,48,96,144,192ms, bSSFP TR/TE=3.8/1.9ms, FOV=128×128mm2, voxel size=1.25×1.25×5mm3,
FA=60°, half-Fourier with 14 reference lines and τ180 of 12ms. A three-parameter
fit was used to derive T2 (as the bSSFP transient signal approaches non-zero
amplitude).5 Additionally, TEs
were corrected as the magnetization is temporarily stored along the
longitudinal axis (signal decay occurs with time constant T1, not T2)
during the execution of refocusing pulses.6
RESULTS
Fig. 1 shows sample images from blood
oxygenated to three HbO2
levels, along with the T2 decay curves. The extracted transverse
relaxation rates (1/T2) are plotted versus (1-HbO2)2
in Fig. 2. Constants K and T2o estimated by regressing the data from
all 35 sample (Fig. 2, black line) were 17.6s-1
and 169ms, respectively. The same plots are also shown for the
data pertaining to each participant’s samples (Fig. 2, colored lines; R2~0.96-0.99,
individual T2o range: 144-187ms). Interestingly, the
slopes of these lines are virtually identical. However, the vertical intercepts
appear to vary slightly as a function of hemoglobin concentration. DISCUSSION
Values
for both sensitivity K and T2o reported here are lower than those previously
described.2 We attribute the discrepancies to the evolution of the magnetization
following T2-preparation and the acquisition of k-space center for
each T2-preparation TE, which for bSSFP is a function of T2
as well as T1. It is therefore essential for the calibration to be
performed with the actual sequence used for T2 mapping. Furthermore,
our findings suggesting T2o dependence on hemoglobin concentration are
in agreement with those from Spees et al.7 who found T2o to
be lower by 95ms at 40% relative to 30% hematocrit (equivalent to 13.3 versus
10.0 g/dL hemoglobin). CONCLUSION
MR oximetry based on T2-prepared
bSSFP is an attractive approach for its speed and SNR efficiency. The
calibration constants presented here should ensure improved accuracy for
whole-blood oximetry based on this method.Acknowledgements
NIH grants U01-HD087180 and K25
HL111422 supported this work.References
1.
Thulborn KR, Waterton JC, Matthews PM, Radda GK. Oxygenation dependence of the
transverse relaxation time of water protons in whole blood at high field.
Biochemica et Biophysica Acta 1982;714(2):265-70.
2. Wright G, Hu B, Macovski A. Estimating
oxygen saturation of blood in vivo with MR imaging at 1.5T. Magn Reson Med. 1991;1:275-83.
3. Lu H, Xu F, Grgac K, Liu P, Qin Q, van
Zijl P. Quantitative evaluation of oxygenation in venous vessels using
T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging MRI. Magn
Reson Med. 2008;60:357-63.
4. Chen J, Pike B. Human whole blood T2
relaxometry at 3 Tesla. Magn
Reson Med. 2009;61:249-54.
5. Akçakaya M, Basha TA, Weingärtner S,
Roujol S, Berg S, Nezafat R. Improved quantitative myocardial T2
mapping: impact of the fitting model.
Magn Reson Med. 2015;74:93-105.
6. Foltz WD, Stainsby JA, Wright GA. T2 accuracy on a
whole-body imager. Magn
Reson Med.
1997;38:759-68.
7. Spees WM, Yablonskiy DA, Oswood MC, Ackerman JH. Water
proton MR properties of human blood at 1.5 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:533-42.