The effect of B0 inhomogeneity on the quantification of hyperpolarized metabolic data is studied using simulations based on B0 maps acquired in-vivo in rat hearts at 9.4T. Kinetic modelling is compared to area-under-the-curve analysis and both methods are applied to average signals over myocardial segments and individual voxels, respectively.
In-vivo B0 maps of healthy rat hearts were acquired for three cases: 1) no shim currents activated, 2) upon first order shimming by minimizing the water line width using a localized spectroscopic pulse sequence with a voxel covering the left ventricle, and 3) upon second order shimming using field maps and a region-of-interest covering the left ventricle. Dynamic metabolic data for pyruvate in the left ventricular blood pool and lactate and bicarbonate in the myocardium were simulated at a resolution of 1.25x1.25mm2 using rat heart anatomy. Noise was added resulting in peak voxel-wise signal-to-noise (SNR) values of 110, 17 and 10 for pyruvate, lactate and bicarbonate, respectively, corresponding to values reported for in-vivo measurements4. Intravoxel dephasing effects in the myocardium were simulated with the high-resolution multi-slice in-vivo B0 maps (N=3 times the metabolic image resolution along each spatial direction). Frequency offsets of N3 subvoxels per voxel in the metabolic image were calculated and the signal per voxel in the metabolic maps was calculated as follows:
$$M_{xy,dephas}(t) = M_{xy}(t)*\frac{1}{N^3}\sum_{i=1}^{N^3}{e^{i2\pi \Delta f_i}}$$
where Δfi is the frequency offset of the ith subvoxel, Mxy(t) is the magnitude of the magnetization in the xy-plane and Mxy,dephas(t) is the magnitude of the magnetization taking into account the intravoxel dephasing. The reconstructed dynamic data with the frequency offsets for the three shim scenarios were quantified and compared to the quantification of the noise-free undistorted data using the root-mean-square error (RMSE). Quantification was carried out with two methods: 1) Area-under-the curve (AUC)3 values of pyruvate, lactate and bicarbonate were calculated by integrating the signal-time-curves and then ratios of the metabolites were computed. 2) Kinetic modelling was performed by solving the following equations:
$$\frac{dP}{dt} = -(k_{PL} + k_{PB} + r_{1P})P + U$$
$$\frac{dL}{dt} = k_{PL}P-r_{1L}L$$
$$\frac{dB}{dt} = k_{PB}P-r_{1B}B$$
$$U=A(t-t_{arr})^{\alpha}e^{\frac{-(t-t_{arr})}{\beta}}$$
where P, L and B are the hyperpolarized signals of pyruvate, lactate and bicarbonate, kPL and kPB are the apparent rate constansts and r1X are decay time constants taking into account T1 relaxation and RF excitation. U is a gamma-variate input function where A, α and β describe the shape and tarr is the arrival time. The equations were simultaneously solved using Matlab. Voxel-wise quantification was compared to segmental quantification using the average signals in four myocardial segments (anterior, septal, inferior, lateral) for both methods.
1. Schroeder MA, Clarke K, Neubauer S, Tyler DJ. Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance A Novel Technique for the In Vivo Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 2011;124:1580–1594.
2. Daniels CJ, McLean MA, Schulte RF, et al. A comparison of quantitative methods for clinical imaging with hyperpolarized13C-pyruvate. NMR Biomed 2016.
3. Hill DK, Orton MR, Mariotti E, et al. Model Free Approach to Kinetic Analysis of Real-Time Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e71996.
4. Krajewski M, Wespi P, Busch J, Wissmann L, Kwiatkowski G, Steinhauser J, Batel M, Ernst M, Kozerke S. A multisample dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization system for serial injections in small animals. Magn Reson Med 2016.