Xing Lu1,2, Alexey Dimov3, Qun He1, Yajun Ma1, Yi Wang3, Eric Y Chang1,4, and Jiang Du1
1Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States, 2Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, People's Republic of China, 3Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States, 4Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Iron overload can affect not only the central nervous system, but the
liver, pancreas, myocardium, endocrine glands, and musculoskeletal structures.
A reliable quantitative method to detect and measure high concentration iron in
vivo would be of great clinical utility. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences have echo times (TE) 100-1000 times
shorter than clinical sequences, and may detect signal from high iron
concentration. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the capability of
UTE-QSM sequence in quantifying high iron concentration with an Iron phantom study and the results show that UTE-QSM techniques can quantify high iron concentration up to 22 mM or
higher.
Introduction
Iron is an essential element for life and is involved
in many integral biologic processes. However, iron is also a potentially toxic
substance. If iron stores exceed the amount that the body can chelate, free
iron will accumulate. Iron overload can affect not only the central nervous
system, but the liver, pancreas, myocardium, endocrine glands, and
musculoskeletal structures1. A reliable quantitative method to
detect and measure high concentration iron in vivo would be of great clinical
utility. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a quantitative method for
the magnetic susceptibility based on the phase information, and can detect iron
distribution in human body 2-4. However, QSM based on conventional
clinical sequences cannot evaluate high iron concentration, which may lead to
very low T2*s and thus too low signal with regular sequences with relatively
long TEs. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences have echo times (TE) 100-1000
times shorter than those of clinical sequences, and may detect signal from high
iron concentration. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the capability of UTE-QSM
sequence in quantifying high iron concentration. Method
An iron phantom was prepared with six tubes, each
filled with 2 mL of Feridex I.V. solution (Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, New
Jersey, USA), with six different concentrations of 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 mMol. The tubes were put in a cylinder container
(10 cm in diameter) filled with agarose gel (0.9% by weight) with the
longitudinal direction of the tubes placed parallel to the B0 field. Equation [1]
describes the phase relationships with the magnetic susceptibility c:$$
φ=-γδBT_{e}, δB=B_0 (χ⨂d) [1]$$
It is obvious that selection of TE will dramatically
affect the phase, which is the basis for phase unwrapping procedure and calculation
of c.
MEDI based QSM was performed under 3T GE scanner using the 3D UTE cones
sequence, which employed a short rectangular pulse excitation followed by 3D
spiral trajectory with a conical view ordering. To study the effect of TE
spacing, five echo spacing (∆TE=0.06, 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2 ms) were investigated
with the first TE keeps 0.032ms. To study the effect of the first TE (TE1), six
TE1s (0.032, 0.132, 0.232, 0.332, 0.632, 0.932 ms) were investigated with five TEs
and a ∆TE of 0.1 ms. The normalized QSM value is calculated by dividing QSM values of each dataset to the QSM value of the second TE of the corresponding dataset. R2*(1/T2*) map was also fitted and calculated from the multi-echo images
using a single-exponential decay model as shown in Equation [2]:
$$s(T_{e})=s_0×e^{-\frac{T_{e}}{T2*}}+Base
[2]$$Results
Figure 1 shows the iron phantom together with T2*/R2*
maps and T2*/R2* as a function of iron concentration. T2* dropped to less than
1 ms with an iron concentration of 6 mM or higher, “invisible” with
conventional clinical MR sequences. An excellent linear relationship was
observed between R2* and iron concentration (R2 = 0.9998).
Figure 2 shows UTE-QSM maps with five different echo
spacing ranging from 0.06 to 1.2 ms. Monotonically increased susceptibility was
observed with ∆TEs of 0.06 and 0.1 ms. With a ∆TE of 0.3 ms, iron concentration
higher than 22 mM could not be quantified. Further increase in ∆TE to 1.2 ms
leads to failure in quantifying iron concentration up to 10 mM.
Figure 3 shows the effect of different TE1 on UTE-QSM
maps. Increased TE1 leads to failure in quantifying high iron concentration. A
TE1 of 0.932 ms can only accurately measure susceptibility up to 10 Mm, while a
TE1 of 0.032 ms can quantify iron concentration up to 22 mM or higher. Discussion and Conclusion
According the MEDI based QSM results, UTE-QSM techniques can quantify high iron
concentration up to 22 mM or higher. This capability is reduced with increasing
∆TE and TE1. In patients with hemophilia or thalassemia where iron
concentration can be very high (30 mM or higher), an initial T2* measurement
would be helpful for the choice of ∆TE. The accuracy of absolute QSM value may be affected due to the changing gradient strength along the acquisition period with the extreme short ∆TE and TE1, further study and optimized TE selection of the sequence is still needed. Clinical evaluation of the UTE-QSM
sequence remains to be done in future studies.Acknowledgements
The
authors acknowledge grant funding from grant funding from the NIH (R01AR062581-01A1 and
R01AR068987-01), the VA Clinical Science R&D Service
(Merit Award I01CX001388), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 51607169) and Chinese
Scholarship Council Grant (CSC 201504910174).References
1. Taher AT, Musallam KM, Inati A. Iron overload:
consequences, assessment, and monitoring. Hemoglobin. 2009; 33(S1):S46-57.
2. Liu T, Spincemaille
P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y. Calculation of susceptibility through
multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse
problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI.
Magn Reson Med 2009;61:196–204
3. de Rochefort L,
Liu T, Kressler B, Liu J, Spincemaille P, Lebon V, Wu J, Wang Y. Quantitative
susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian
regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med
2010;63:194–206.
4. Liu T, Liu J,
de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative
susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image
and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage 2012;59:2560–2568