Sudath Hapuarachchige1, Wenlian Zhu1, Yoshinori Kato1,2, Marina V. Backer3, Susanta Sarkar4, Joseph M Backer1,3, and Dmitri Artemov1,5
1Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Life Science Tokyo Advanced Research Center (L-StaR), Hoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Tokyo, Japan, 3SibTech, Inc., Brookfield, CT, 4CadenzaMed LLC, Wayne, PA, 5Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Noninvasive
image-guided drug delivery is important in cancer drug development, and allows visualizing
the delivery and predicting the outcome. In this study, the delivery and
therapeutic effects of liposomes targeted to tumor vasculature was researched. Intravital
microscopy and MRI were used for tracking the drug delivery and therapeutic
effects were monitored in MDA-MB-231 mouse tumor model. Our experimental
results suggest that targeting liposomes to VEGF receptors (VEGFRs) expressed
on tumor endothelium, may inhibit EPR-mediated extravasation and accumulation
of VEGFR-targeted liposomes.
Introduction
Noninvasive image-guided nanocarrier platforms
are highly important in cancer drug development, and allow visualizing the
delivery and thus predicting the outcome. Many tumors including triple-negative
breast cancer (TNBC) do not have established molecular targets and in this case
targeting of tumor vasculature, which expresses unique molecular markers, can
be a valuable option.1 In this study, we investigated the specific
therapy by paclitaxel loaded liposomes targeted to vascular endothelial growth
factor receptors (VEGFRs) overexpressed in tumor vasculature. MRI and optical
image guidance was used to characterize the delivery of liposomes in animal
models of TNBC.Methods
Liposomal nanocarriers
were formulated using DSPE lipid and cholesterol, labeled with Ominiscan or nanomag-D-spio magnetic nanoparticles, and loaded with paclitaxel.
Liposomes were also labeled with rhodamine (Rhod) or DSPE-PEG2-CFluor fluorescent
markers. For targeting the liposomes were decorated with single-chain VEGF (scVEGF)
by post-insertion of scVEGF-PEG3400-DSPE conjugates into the lipid
bylayer (Figure 1). Orthotopic MDA-MB-231 TNBC models were grown in the mammary
fat pad of athymic mice. MR studies were performed on a 9.4 T Bruker Biospec
spectrometer. T1- and T2-weighted images
were acquired using the RARE sequence before and after the treatment with liposomes
at a dose of 11 μmol Fe/kg to assess the delivery and stability of liposomes loaded
with both OminiscanTM and nanomag®-D-spio.2 Gd-DTPA enhanced mages were acquired
with a 3D gradient T1-weighted echo sequence, using TE/TR = 2/6 ms, and flip angle 23 degree.
For intravital
multiphoton fluorescence microscopy (MPM) a "U" shape skin-flap was
cut in the dorso-lateral skin of the tumor and the animal was immobilized on the
mouse holder. Mice were i.v. injected with targeted Lip(scVEGF)(Gd/Fe)(Rhod) or untargeted
Lip(Gd/Fe)(Rhod) liposomes, respectively, and fluorescence images were taken
using an Olympus FV1000MPE multiphoton microscope (Figure 3).
For the
therapeutic study, Lip(scVEGF)(Gd/Fe)(Px)(CFluor) and Lip(Gd/Fe)(CFluor)(Px) were
used. Two groups of mice were treated orally with sunitinib (5 days on/5 days
off) and therapeutic liposomes at days 1, 12, and 21 (Figure 4A). Animals in the control group received saline
injections. MRI was performed at days 1, 12, and 21 (Figure 4B). Tumors and organs were extracted for the
determination of biodistribution of paclitaxel. Dimensions of tumors were
measured by a caliper every 3rd day and by principal axes determined
from the MRI images on day 1, 12, and 21. The paclitaxel content in liposomes
and paclitaxel biodistribution were measured by HPLC.Results
The T2-weighted
MR images of tumors before and after i.v. administration of untargeted- and
targeted-liposomes are shown in Figure 2. These results revealed that at 4 and
24 hours post-injection untargeted-liposome provided improved tumor
accumulation compared to the VEGFR-targeted liposomes. The highest uptake index
occurred 4 h after the administration in all three groups; however, only Lipo(Gd/Fe)
produced statistically significant hypo-intense tumor signals at 4 h time point
(Figure 2).
Intravital MPM images
of the distribution of the Lip(Rhod) in the tumor vasculature are shown in
Figure 3A. Complete clearance of the probe from the blood stream and binding to
the blood vessel walls was detected 35 min after administration. MPM images of untargeted and scVEGF-targeted Lip(Rhod)
in the vasculature of MDA-MB-231 tumors are shown in Figure 3B. High
magnification images (left) demonstrate extravasation of the untargeted
liposomes due to EPR effect whereas no extravasation was detected for the
targeted liposomes presumably due to high-affinity binding to the endothelial
cells via VEGFR2 receptors. The results of ongoing studies demonstrate minimal
therapeutic effects measured form changes in tumor volumes and biodistribution
of paclitaxel measured by HPLC between the Lip(scVEGF)(Gd/Fe)(Px)(CFluor) and
Lip(Gd/Fe)(Px)(CFluor) following the treatment plan in Figure 4A. Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI images demonstrated
similar tumor enhancement pattern in mice received untargeted and targeted liposome
(Figure 4B).Discussion
Efficient
delivery of therapeutic liposomes was detected by MRI and optical imaging. However,
no increase in the delivery was detected for liposomes specifically targeted to
tumor vasculature. We hypothesize that binding of liposomes to VEGFRs on tumor
endothelium, may even inhibits their intratumoral delivery via non-specific
EPR-mediated extravasation and accumulation. However, we also
cannot exclude the possibility that decoration of liposomes with scVEGF could
by itself change their pharmacokinetics and the ability to extravasate. In
addition, sub-therapeutic doses of paclitaxel loaded liposomes were used, which
might affect treatment outcomes.Conclusions
Noninvasive MRI
and intravital microscopy can provide critical information for delivery of
nanomedicine and for tracking of delivery and therapeutic effects of these
nano-constructs in preclinical cancer models. The concept of vascular targeting
is still in its infancy and requires significantly more rigorous research and
development using image-guided approach in appropriate animal models.
Acknowledgements
This study was
supported by the National Institutes of Health, CA154738 (DA, JMB, and SS). We
are grateful to Mr. Desmond Jacob for technical assistance in multiphoton
fluorescence microscopy.References
1. Onuki Y, Jacobs I, Artemov D, et
al. Noninvasive visualization of in vivo release and intratumoral distribution of surrogate MR contrast agent using the dual MR contrast technique. Biomaterials 2010;31(27):7132-7138.
2. Kato Y, Zhu W, Backer MV, et
al. Noninvasive imaging of liposomal Delivery of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to orthotopic human breast tumor in mice. Pharmaceut Res. 2015;32(11):3746-3755.