Lucian A. B. Purvis1, William T. Clarke1, Ladislav Valkovic1, Christina Levick1, Michael Pavlides2, Eleanor Barnes2, Jeremy F. Cobbold2, Stefan Neubauer1, Matthew D. Robson1, and Christopher T. Rodgers1
1OCMR, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Phosphorus (31P) metabolites have potential value
as markers in liver disease. The increase in field strength from 3 to 7T allows
more accurate quantitation of the liver 31P-MRS spectrum. Ten
volunteers and eleven patients with liver cirrhosis were scanned using a
16-channel array and a 3D UTE-CSI sequence. Metabolite concentrations were
calculated using an endogenous 2.5mM ATP reference. Significant reductions in
inorganic phosphate and phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphatidylcholine concentrations
were seen, as well as an increase in glycerophosphoethanolamine (P<0.05). The splitting of PDE into
its constituent peaks allows more insight into changes in metabolism.
Purpose
The burden of hepatic disease is increasing1. Phosphorus (31P)
metabolites have potential value as markers for diseases including
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)2, and cirrhosis3. The increase in
field strength from 3T to 7T increases SNR4
and allows increased spectral resolution5. In addition,
using a 16-channel array at 7T increases the coverage and precision of
metabolite peak fitting6. These allow more
accurate quantitation of the liver 31P-MRS spectrum, especially the
phosphodiester (PDE) region7. This study
investigates the effect of this improved quantification on measuring metabolites
in the cirrhotic liver.Methods
Ten volunteers (six male and four female, 27 ± 5 years, BMI
22.5 ± 1.5 kg.m-2) and eleven patients with cirrhosis of the liver (seven
male and four female, 61 ± 6 years, BMI 29.5 ± 6.9 kg.m-2) were
scanned supine after an overnight fast using a whole-body Siemens Magnetom 7T (Siemens
Healthcare, Germany) and a 16-channel 31P receive array coil (Rapid
Biomedical, Germany)8. The patients were
recruited based on cirrhosis established using clinical, biochemical or
radiological criteria. Five patients had been previously diagnosed with
hepatitis C, three with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, two with alcoholic
steatohepatitis, and one with autoimmune hepatitis. Data were acquired as
previously described6. In short, a 1s TR,
UTE-CSI sequence was used to acquire a 16 × 16 × 8 matrix of liver spectra over
a 270 x 240 x 200 mm3 field of view.
Whitened singular value decomposition (WSVD)9 was used for channel
combination. The CSI data were then analysed as previously described6, giving a mean and
standard deviation for each subject. Concentrations were calculated using γ-ATP
(adenosine triphosphate) as a 2.5mM endogenous reference10. Results
The average γ-ATP linewidth in cirrhosis was 43.25 ± 10.65Hz
compared to 44.02 ± 18.86 Hz in normal volunteers. The average γ-ATP SNR was 19.58
± 3.64 in cirrhosis compared to 20.77 ± 6.15.
Average metabolite concentrations for both normal and
cirrhotic livers are given in Table 1, and the concentrations for individual
patients are given in Table 2 with their diagnoses.
Figure 2 shows the concentrations for each volunteer and
patient. There are significant reduction in inorganic phosphate (P = 0.005), and phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphatidylcholine
(PEP/PtdC) concentrations (P =
0.016), and a trend to a reduction in phosphocholine (P = 0.08). There was a significant increase in glycerophosphoethanolamine
concentrations (P = 0.04). Only nicotinamide dinucleotide has a
significantly larger variance in patients than in healthy volunteers (F-test, P = 0.003). There was no significant
difference in residual phosphocreatine signal.Discussion
The average γ-ATP linewidths indicates that the shim was
also not significantly different from in healthy volunteers. Only nicotinamide
dinucleotide has a significantly larger variance than in healthy volunteers
(F-test, P = 0.003), and the residual
phosphocreatine signal is not significantly higher. Our protocol is therefore
still effective in patients with cirrhotic livers.
We saw a significant 12% reduction in inorganic phosphate (P = 0.005), which agrees with the 18%
change reported by Dezortova et al. in patients with cirrhosis3. A reduction in inorganic
phosphate has been correlated with an increase in hepatic inflammation11. Dezortova et al.
also found a significant 34% reduction in PDE, whereas we saw a significant 21%
increase in GPE (P = 0.04). The two
PDE metabolites are cell degradation products, so this study would indicate an
increase in cell turnover rate, which has been previously found in hepatitis-C
induced cirrhosis12. There are two
contaminating factors in the PDE signal at low field strength: signal from the
PEP/PtdC peak, and a broad underlying peak from phospholipids in the membrane7. The PEP/PtdC
signal was reduced by 23% (P = 0.02).
This signal reduction is likely due to a reduction of bile in the liver. The
remaining change in PDE, and the increase in PME at 3T might be explained by a
variation in the underlying phospholipid signal.Conclusion
We report comparable quality of data in patients with
cirrhosis and in healthy volunteers. 7T 31P
spectroscopy with a receive array is a powerful tool for studying metabolism in
the diseased liver. A reduction in inorganic phosphate indicates an increase in
inflammation in the cirrhotic liver. The splitting of PDE into its constituent
peaks allows more insight into changes in metabolism.Acknowledgements
Funded
by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society
(Grant Number 098436/Z/12/Z). LABP has a DPhil studentship from the Medical
Research Council (UK).References
1. Blachier M, et al. J Hepatol. 2013
2. Abrigo JM, et al. J Hepatol. 2014
3. Dezortova M, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2005
4. Runge JH, et al. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016
5. Chmelik M, et al. NMR Biomed. 2014
6. Purvis LAB, et al. Proc. ISMRM p.0838, 2015
7. Purvis LAB, et al. Proc. ISMRM p.3691, 2016;
8. Rodgers CT, et al., Proc ISMRM p.2896, 2014;
9. Rodgers CT, Robson MD. Magn Reson Med. 2016
10. Sijens PE, et al. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998
11. van Wassenaer-van Hall HN, et al. Hepatology. 1995
12. Karidis NP, et al.
Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2015