Chen-Te Chou1,2 and Ran-Chou Chen3,4
1Radiology, Chang-Hua Christian Hospital, Chang-Hua, Taiwan, 2Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, 4Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
Synopsis
The purpose of our study was to investigate the
relationship between splenic MR elastography (MRE) and liver fibrosis stages.
109 patients underwent histological examination and abdominal MR examination
within 3-months interval were enrolled in our study. MRE was performed with
passive driver on right and left chest wall separately. The mean stiffness
value of liver and spleen was determined and showed good correlation between
hepatic/splenic stiffness and liver fibrosis stage. Our results demonstrated
that spleen stiffness measured by MRE was significant correlated with liver
fibrosis stage. Combination of the spleen/liver stiffness provide higher
diagnostic value than liver stiffness alone.
Aim
Splenomegaly is a common complication in
patients with liver fibrosis and cirrhosis and portal congestion, tissue
hyperplasia and fibrosis are the main factors to increase the spleen size. The
purpose of our study was to investigate the relationship between splenic MR
elastography (MRE) and liver fibrosis stages.Materials and Methods
This retrospective study was approved and
the informed consent was waived by our institutional review board. Finally, 109
patients (16 healthy living donors, 93 patients with chronic liver disease) underwent
histological examination and abdominal MR examination within 3-months interval
were enrolled. All MRE images were obtained from a 1.5 Tesla scanner using a 16-channel
phased array body coil. Two passive drivers were placed on patient’s right and
left chest wall at the level of xiphoid simultaneously and imaging scan were
performed separately. Continuous vibration waves of 60Hz were generated by
active driver and the 2D gradient echo MR elastography was performed. A
confidence map was created automatically. Five elastogram of liver and three
elastogram of spleen for each patient were obtained.
One radiologist who was blinded to patients’
clinical information and pathological results performed the quantitative
analyses of all images on workstation. The stiffness was calculated using the
ROI (region of interesting) manually drawn on each elastogram with confidence
mask. The ROI should be greater than 200 mm2 and avoid major blood
vessels, obvious wave disturbance districts, and tumors. The mean stiffness
value of liver and spleen was determined as follow: mean stiffness
value =Σ stiffness value x ROI area/Σ ROI
area. All liver specimens were evaluated
by one pathologist who was blinded to the patients’ clinical information and
MRE results using METAVIR system (F0~F40). Fibrosis stage of F3 or higher was
consider to be advanced liver fibrosis.Results
The
liver and splenic stiffness values obtained when passive driver placed at right
and left location are shown on Figure 1. The correlation of liver and spleen
stiffness with fibrosis stages were depicted on Figure 2. Using Spearman’ rank test,
the correlation coefficient with passive driver against right chest wall (γ=0.72) was better than driver on left
chest wall (γ=0.62) between the liver stiffness measurement and the fibrosis
stages. According to our results, the passive driver should be placed near the
target organ. The spleen stiffness
with passive driver on left chest wall showed good correlation with liver
fibrosis stages (p<0.001).
As 109 patients were divided into two
subgroups: 55 patients with F0, F1 and F2l, and 54 patients with F3 and F4 (advanced
liver fibrosis). The diagnostic performances of the liver stiffness, spleen
stiffness, and combination of the liver/splenic stiffness in prediction of
advanced liver fibrosis were shown on Figure 3. The combination of spleen/liver
stiffness value in detecting advanced liver fibrosis showed highest diagnostic
value.Discussions
The results of our study indicate that the
spleen stiffness obtained with the passive driver placed on left chest wall was
significantly correlated with liver fibrosis stages (p<0.001). Our results
agreed with Jayant et al. study [1]. However, the correlation between hepatic
fibrosis and splenic stiffness with passive driver on left chest wall was higher
than passive driver on right chest wall. According to our results, the passive
driver should place on left chest wall instead of right chest wall for patients
underwent splenic MR elastography.
In prediction of hepatic fibrosis stage, the
combination of splenic and hepatic stiffness provided higher diagnostic value
than hepatic stiffness alone. One possible reason was that portal pressure was
one of factors in hepatic stiffness measurement for patients underwent MR
elastography. Previous studies have been reported that portal pressure, splenic
volume, gastroesophageal varices were associated with splenic stiffness [2].Conclusion
Our results demonstrated that spleen
stiffness measured by MRE was significant correlated with liver fibrosis stage.
Combination of the spleen/liver stiffness provide higher diagnostic value than
liver stiffness alone.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Talwalkar
JA, Yin M, Venkatesh S, et al. Feasibility of in vivo MR elastographic splenic
stiffness measurements in the assessment of portal hypertension. AJR Am J
Roentgenol 2009;193(1):122-7.
2. Shin
SU, Lee JM, Yu MH, et al. Prediction of esophageal varices in patients with
cirrhosis: usefulness of three-dimensional MR elastography with echo-planar
imaging technique. Radiology 2014;272(1):143-53.