A common way to seed tractography is thresholding the Fractional Anisotropy (FA). This technique is problematic for aging diffusion MRI studies because the FA decreases dramatically in regions of White Matter Hyperintensities (WMH) and thus, the tractography can erroneously start or stop in these WMH regions. We show the importance for tractography pipelines to correct for WMH in their tracking masks. We show that the non-correction can lead to approximately 15% erroneous streamlines, which are false connections that can pollute the structural connectome and lead to misinterpretations.
Datasets are acquired on a 3.0T Philips Achieva from 5 older subjects (mean age: 86.32 years). On each subject, we have a diffusion weighted images with 22 directions (b = 1000s/mm2 and voxel size: 2x2x2 mm3) and a 1mm isotropic T1-weighted image and a 0.72×1.20×5 mm3 FLAIR sequence3. Severity of WMH was evaluated by two trained operators according to the Fazekas4 rating scale. Using this visual scale, we selected subjects with an extensive halo of WMH (grade 3). We compute white-matter (WM), gray-matter (GM) and cerebrospinal (CSF) maps with Statistical Parametric Mapping5 and a WMH probability mask with the Lesion Segmentation Tool6. We compute the fODF7 with maximal Spherical Harmonic order of 68. We then generate include, exclude and WM-GM interface tracking masks as in9. The main problem with these masks is that the voxels with WMH are considered like GM voxels (see Figure 1). However, the WMH should be in the WM mask. To correct for this problem, we remove them from the interface (Figure 1.B) and we add them accordingly in the include and exclude masks. Then, we perform anatomically constrained probabilistic tractography using the Particle Filtering Tractography (PFT)9 with one seed per voxel from the GW-WM interface.
To study the impacts of hyperintensities on tractography, we do PFT with and without tracking mask correction. We extract the number of seeds and streamlines in both results as well as quantify streamlines through WMH.
[1] F.-E. de Leeuw et al., “Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study,” J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 9–14, Jan. 2001.
[2] A. Pelletier et al., “Age-Related Modifications of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters and White Matter Hyperintensities as Inter-Dependent Processes,” Front. Aging Neurosci, p. 255, 2016.
[3] C. Bernard et al., “Time course of brain volume changes in the preclinical phase of Alzheimer’s disease,” Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 143–151.e1, Mar. 2014.
[4] F. Fazekas, J. B. Chawluk, A. Alavi, H. I. Hurtig, and R. A. Zimmerman, “MR Signal Abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s Dementia and Normal Aging,” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 421–426, May 1987.
[5] W. D. Penny, K. J. Friston, J. T. Ashburner, S. J. Kiebel, and T. E. Nichols, Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. Academic Press, 2011.
[6] P. Schmidt et al., “An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in Multiple Sclerosis,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 3774–3783, Feb. 2012.
[7] J.-D. Tournier, F. Calamante, and A. Connelly, “Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution,” Neuroimage, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1459–1472, May 2007.
[8] E. Garyfallidis et al., “Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data,” Front. Neuroinform, vol. 8, p. 8, 2014.
[9] G. Girard, K. Whittingstall, R. Deriche, and M. Descoteaux, “Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases,” Neuroimage, vol. 98, pp. 266–278, Sep. 2014.
[10] A. N. Voineskos et al., “Age-related decline in white matter tract integrity and cognitive performance: a DTI tractography and structural equation modeling study,” Neurobiol. Aging, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 21–34, Jan. 2012.
[11] O. Ciccarelli, M. Catani, H. Johansen-Berg, C. Clark, and A. Thompson, “Diffusion-based tractography in neurological disorders: concepts, applications, and future developments,” Lancet Neurol, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 715–727, Aug. 2008.
[12] E. Martínez-Heras et al., “Improved Framework for Tractography Reconstruction of the Optic Radiation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 9, p. e0137064, 2015.
[13] A. Klistorner, C. Wang, C. Yiannikas, S. L. Graham, J. Parratt, and M. H. Barnett, “Progressive Injury in Chronic Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Is Gender-Specific: A DTI Study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 2, p. e0149245, 2016.
[14] R. E. Smith, J.-D. Tournier, F. Calamante, and A. Connelly, “Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information,” NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1924–1938, Sep. 2012.