Joshua Yung1, Hua Ai1, Ho-Ling Liu1, and R Jason Stafford1
1Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
The purpose of this study was to characterize
ADC values when varying imaging parameters in a diffusion-weighted (DW) FSE
sequence with Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced
Reconstruction (PROPELLER) k-space trajectory. The QIBA diffusion phantom was used
to quantitatively evaluate the different pulse sequences. The DW PROPELLER
sequence showed good agreement with the QIBA SE EPI sequence with the ETL=20
and b-value of 0 and 2000 s/mm2 sequence having with a r2=0.9034. The
DW PROPELLER sequence is promising for quantitative evaluation of ADC values
and this study may help improve clinical protocols using diffusion weighted
imaging.
Introduction
The purpose of this study is to determine the
quantitative variability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values when
varying imaging parameters in a diffusion-weighted (DW) fast spin echo (FSE)
sequence with Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced
Reconstruction (PROPELLER) k-space trajectory.Methods
Using a 3T MRI scanner (Discovery MR750, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, WI), a NIST traceable, quantitative magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) diffusion phantom (High Precision Devices, Inc, Boulder,
Colorado) consisting of 13 vials filled with various concentrations of polymer
polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in aqueous solution (Figure 1) was imaged with a
standard Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) DWI spin echo, echo
planar imaging (SE EPI) acquisition. The vials have a range of concentrations
of PVP allowing for a range of ADC values from 118x10-6mm2/s
to 1091x10-6mm2/s. To eliminate the temperature
sensitivity of diffusion, the phantom was filled with ice water to equilibrate
the phantom at 0°C prior to scanning. The same phantom was then imaged with a
DWI PROPELLER sequence at varying echo train lengths (ETL) of 8, 20, and 32, as
well as b-values of 400, 900, and 2000 s/mm2. Figure 2 shows the imaging parameters used. QIBA DWI phantom
analysis software was used to generate ADC maps and create region of interests
(ROIs) for quantitative measurements of each vial. Mean and standard deviations
of the ROIs in the ADC maps were calculated. The mean of the measured ADC
values and individual voxel values were compared to the known ADC value of each
vial.Results
The SE EPI sequence generated ADC values that
showed very good agreement with the known ADC values of the phantom (r2
= 0.9995, slope = 1.0061) (Figure 3). The ADC values measured from the
PROPELLER sequences were inflated, but were highly correlated with an r2
range from 0.8754 to 0.9880. The PROPELLER sequence with an ETL=20 and b-value
of 0 and 2000 s/mm2 showed the closest agreement (r2 =
0.9034, slope = 0.9880). In a voxel-by-voxel comparison, the ADC maps produced
by the pulse sequence with an ETL of 8 generated the most outliers and voxels
that were not able to be processed (Figure 4). The sequence with an ETL = 20
had the least amount of outliers and had consistent variability across
b-values. The
sequence with an ETL = 20 and b-values of 0 and 2000 s/mm2 resulted
in the least variability. In separating the error to individual ADC values or
PVP concentrations, the sequence with an ETL = 20 also showed consistent lower
error compared to the other sequences across the applied b-values (Figure 5).
The sequence with a b-value of 0 and 500 s/mm2 showed the highest
error across all the sequences.Conclusion
The DW PROPELLER sequence is promising for quantitative evaluation of
ADC values. A drawback of the PROPELLER sequence is the longer acquisition
time. The 180° refocusing pulses may also cause the observed increase in ADC
values compared to the standard SE EPI DW sequence. However, the FSE sequence
offers an advantage with in-plane motion and geometric distortion which will be
investigated in future studies. This quantitative comparison helps the decision
making process for improving clinical protocols.Acknowledgements
Appreciation
is expressed to Dr. Thomas Chenevert for providing the analysis package used in
this study. Part of the research was conducted at the Center for Advanced
Biomedical Imaging at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center with
equipment support from GE Healthcare.References
No reference found.