More than 75% of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) seeking medical attention are mild, and the outcome of mild TBI (mTBI) is heterogeneous. Currently we are in badly need of the methods of classifying mTBI into more homogeneous subgroups since there is not a sensitive and valid biomarker identified right now. In current study, we aim to investigate whether different subgroups exist in a large cohort patients and to predict neuropsychological outcome in the future.
Results
43 mTBI patients with mean age of 47±5 and 42 gender, age socio-cultural level matched controls were included in this study. Our cluster method achieved the best Silhouette (0.48), Dunn (20.15) and connectivity (2.56) when the cluster number was equal to 2. 8 white matter tracts were determined when identifying mTBI group from control group using hierarchical clustering with a high accuracy (>80%, p=0.026). Then, mTBI patients were divided into 2 subgroups in acute period (19 and 24 patients) and 3-month period (21 and 22 patients) separately with the 8 determined tracts. Taking the IPS as criterion, the accuracy of the clustering method was high (86%, p=0.031 and 87.5%, p=0.029 for acute and 3-month period, respectively). Comparing the clustering results between acute and 3-month period, we found that there were only 7% mTBI patients assigned in the wrong subgroup (Fig 1). In pointwise comparison of FA profiles, subgroup 2 showed widespread FA reduction relative control individuals in the right Inferior longitudinal fasciculus, right uncinated fasciculus, and right anterior thalamic radiation (Fig 2).Discussion
mTBI often resulted in heterogeneous cognitive impairment as well as DTI metrics degenerating. However, these injures did not explain clinical outcome well. There were several subgroups with homogeneous features in the mTBI patients. Clustering is a widely used method which can figure out the number of subgroups among the patients, automatically. The result of clustering was highly consistent with that of the IPS, from which we can guess the determined 8 tracts may explain the outcome after suffering the brain injure. In addition, the clustering results in acute and 3-month period had a similar grouping situation, which meaned that the subgroups in the mTBI patients were relatively stable. But the variability of the grouping may indicate a more complex mechanism of mTBI injury. Besides, the first subgroup showed widespread white matter abnormalities compared with control individuals, while the second group only demonstrated circumscribed regional white matter abnormalities in the identified tracts.Conclusion
There were two main different subgroups in mild TBI patients and clustering is a reliable method to figure out the subgroups and to predict neuropsychological outcome among the mTBIs.[1] M. E. Shenton, H M Hamoda, J S Schneiderman, et al. A review of magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2012;(6):137-192.
[2] Smith, S.M., Jenkinson, M., Johansen-Berg, et al. Tractbased spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage. 2006;31:1487–1505.
[3] Huaiqiang Sun, Su Lui, et al. Two Patterns of White Matter Abnormalities in Medication-Naive Patients With First-Episode Schizophrenia Revealed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Cluster Analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72(7):678-86.
[4] Peter J.Hellyer, MRes,et al. Individual Prediction of White Matter Injury following Traumatic Brain Injury. Ann Neurol. 2013;73:489-499.